Iceland has a population density of 10.4 people per square mile compared to 1,467 people in San Marino. Iceland has 2,740,233 sq ft of land per person vs 19,388 sq ft in San Marino. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Iceland and San Marino are ranked 192nd and 15th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Iceland has 0.005% of the world's population and 0.07% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.0004% of the population and 0.00004% of the land area for San Marino, hence the population density in Iceland is 99.3% lower than in San Marino.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 10.4 ppl/mi² | 1,467 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 192/197 | 15/197 |
| Population |
412970
|
33996
|
| Land area | 38,931 sq mi | 23.2 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 2,682,398 sq ft | 19,008 sq ft |
| Rural population | 5.91% | 2.07% |
| Urban population | 94.1% | 97.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Iceland vs San Marino:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Iceland increased by 37.7%, compared to a 15.3% growth in San Marino.
In 2004, Iceland ranked 188th for population density and is in 192nd place now. San Marino was 14th in 2004 and ranks 15th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 10.4 | 1,467 |
| 2023 | 10.1 | 1,462 |
| 2022 | 9.81 | 1,457 |
| 2021 | 9.57 | 1,479 |
| 2020 | 9.41 | 1,501 |
| 2019 | 9.26 | 1,496 |
| 2018 | 9.06 | 1,490 |
| 2017 | 8.87 | 1,460 |
| 2016 | 8.67 | 1,429 |
| 2015 | 8.55 | 1,420 |
| 2014 | 8.46 | 1,410 |
| 2013 | 8.36 | 1,426 |
| 2012 | 8.29 | 1,445 |
| 2011 | 8.24 | 1,408 |
| 2010 | 8.22 | 1,436 |
| 2009 | 8.23 | 1,427 |
| 2008 | 8.2 | 1,367 |
| 2007 | 8.05 | 1,347 |
| 2006 | 7.85 | 1,303 |
| 2005 | 7.67 | 1,288 |
| 2004 | 7.55 | 1,272 |
| 2003 | 7.48 | 1,202 |
| 2002 | 7.43 | 1,187 |
| 2001 | 7.36 | 1,172 |
| 2000 | 7.27 | 1,157 |
| 1999 | 7.17 | 1,142 |
| 1998 | 7.08 | 1,128 |
| 1997 | 7 | 1,114 |
| 1996 | 6.95 | 1,100 |
| 1995 | 6.91 | 1,086 |
| 1994 | 6.87 | 1,072 |
| 1993 | 6.81 | 1,056 |
| 1992 | 6.74 | 1,041 |
| 1991 | 6.66 | 1,027 |
| 1990 | 6.58 | 1,013 |
| 1989 | 6.53 | 999 |
| 1988 | 6.45 | 986 |
| 1987 | 6.35 | 979 |
| 1986 | 6.28 | 977 |
| 1985 | 6.24 | 971 |
| 1984 | 6.19 | 965 |
| 1983 | 6.12 | 960 |
| 1982 | 6.04 | 952 |
| 1981 | 5.96 | 943 |
| 1980 | 5.89 | 932 |
| 1979 | 5.83 | 920 |
| 1978 | 5.78 | 908 |
| 1977 | 5.73 | 864 |
| 1976 | 5.69 | 825 |
| 1975 | 5.63 | 822 |
| 1974 | 5.56 | 821 |
| 1973 | 5.49 | 820 |
| 1972 | 5.4 | 811 |
| 1971 | 5.32 | 795 |
| 1970 | 5.28 | 784 |
| 1969 | 5.25 | 778 |
| 1968 | 5.21 | 771 |
| 1967 | 5.13 | 764 |
| 1966 | 5.05 | 756 |
| 1965 | 4.97 | 747 |
| 1964 | 4.88 | 733 |
| 1963 | 4.8 | 716 |
| 1962 | 4.71 | 699 |
| 1961 | 4.63 | 682 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 94.1% | 97.9% |
| 2023 | 94% | 97.8% |
| 2022 | 94% | 97.7% |
| 2021 | 93.9% | 97.6% |
| 2020 | 93.9% | 97.5% |
| 2019 | 93.9% | 97.4% |
| 2018 | 93.8% | 97.2% |
| 2017 | 93.8% | 97.1% |
| 2016 | 93.7% | 96.9% |
| 2015 | 93.7% | 96.7% |
| 2014 | 93.7% | 96.6% |
| 2013 | 93.6% | 96.4% |
| 2012 | 93.6% | 96.2% |
| 2011 | 93.6% | 96% |
| 2010 | 93.6% | 95.7% |
| 2009 | 93.5% | 95.5% |
| 2008 | 93.4% | 95.3% |
| 2007 | 93.3% | 95% |
| 2006 | 93.2% | 94.7% |
| 2005 | 93% | 94.5% |
| 2004 | 92.9% | 94.2% |
| 2003 | 92.8% | 94% |
| 2002 | 92.7% | 93.9% |
| 2001 | 92.5% | 93.8% |
| 2000 | 92.4% | 93.4% |
| 1999 | 92.3% | 93.1% |
| 1998 | 92.1% | 92.8% |
| 1997 | 92% | 92.4% |
| 1996 | 91.8% | 92.1% |
| 1995 | 91.6% | 91.7% |
| 1994 | 91.5% | 91.3% |
| 1993 | 91.3% | 90.8% |
| 1992 | 91.1% | 90.4% |
| 1991 | 90.9% | 90.4% |
| 1990 | 90.8% | 90.4% |
| 1989 | 90.5% | 90.4% |
| 1988 | 90.3% | 90.4% |
| 1987 | 90.1% | 90.4% |
| 1986 | 89.8% | 89.4% |
| 1985 | 89.6% | 88.3% |
| 1984 | 89.3% | 87.1% |
| 1983 | 89.1% | 85.8% |
| 1982 | 88.8% | 84.4% |
| 1981 | 88.5% | 82.9% |
| 1980 | 88.3% | 81.2% |
| 1979 | 88% | 79.5% |
| 1978 | 87.6% | 77.6% |
| 1977 | 87.3% | 75.6% |
| 1976 | 87% | 73.6% |
| 1975 | 86.7% | 71.5% |
| 1974 | 86.3% | 69.3% |
| 1973 | 86% | 67% |
| 1972 | 85.6% | 64.7% |
| 1971 | 85.3% | 62.3% |
| 1970 | 84.9% | 59.8% |
| 1969 | 84.5% | 58.7% |
| 1968 | 84.1% | 57.7% |
| 1967 | 83.6% | 56.6% |
| 1966 | 83.2% | 55.5% |
| 1965 | 82.7% | 54.4% |
| 1964 | 82.3% | 53.3% |
| 1963 | 81.8% | 52.2% |
| 1962 | 81.3% | 51.1% |
| 1961 | 80.8% | 50% |
| 1960 | 80.3% | 48.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 92.9% to 94.1% in Iceland and from 94.2% to 97.9% in San Marino.
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons