Iceland has a population density of 10.4 people per square mile compared to 1,006 people in the Philippines. Iceland has 2,740,233 sq ft of land per person vs 31,912 sq ft in the Philippines. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Iceland and the Philippines are ranked 192nd and 24th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Iceland has 0.005% of the world's population and 0.07% of the land area of all countries, compared to 1.42% of the population and 0.2% of the land area for the Philippines, hence the population density in Iceland is 99% lower than in the Philippines.
Population density comparison
Iceland
|
Philippines
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 10.4 ppl/mi² | 1,006 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 192/197 | 24/197 |
| Population |
412970
|
117540050
|
| Land area | 38,931 sq mi | 115,124 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 2,682,398 sq ft | 27,705 sq ft |
| Rural population | 5.91% | 51.4% |
| Urban population | 94.1% | 48.6% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 7.12% |
Iceland vs the Philippines:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Iceland increased by 37.7%, compared to a 34.1% growth in the Philippines.
In 2004, Iceland ranked 188th for population density and is in 192nd place now. The Philippines was 28th in 2004 and ranks 24th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Iceland
|
Philippines
|
|
| 2024 | 10.4 | 1,006 |
| 2023 | 10.1 | 998 |
| 2022 | 9.81 | 990 |
| 2021 | 9.57 | 982 |
| 2020 | 9.41 | 974 |
| 2019 | 9.26 | 962 |
| 2018 | 9.06 | 951 |
| 2017 | 8.87 | 939 |
| 2016 | 8.67 | 927 |
| 2015 | 8.55 | 915 |
| 2014 | 8.46 | 901 |
| 2013 | 8.36 | 887 |
| 2012 | 8.29 | 870 |
| 2011 | 8.24 | 853 |
| 2010 | 8.22 | 837 |
| 2009 | 8.23 | 820 |
| 2008 | 8.2 | 805 |
| 2007 | 8.05 | 791 |
| 2006 | 7.85 | 778 |
| 2005 | 7.67 | 765 |
| 2004 | 7.55 | 750 |
| 2003 | 7.48 | 736 |
| 2002 | 7.43 | 722 |
| 2001 | 7.36 | 707 |
| 2000 | 7.27 | 692 |
| 1999 | 7.17 | 675 |
| 1998 | 7.08 | 658 |
| 1997 | 7 | 642 |
| 1996 | 6.95 | 627 |
| 1995 | 6.91 | 613 |
| 1994 | 6.87 | 600 |
| 1993 | 6.81 | 587 |
| 1992 | 6.74 | 573 |
| 1991 | 6.66 | 559 |
| 1990 | 6.58 | 546 |
| 1989 | 6.53 | 532 |
| 1988 | 6.45 | 519 |
| 1987 | 6.35 | 505 |
| 1986 | 6.28 | 492 |
| 1985 | 6.24 | 480 |
| 1984 | 6.19 | 467 |
| 1983 | 6.12 | 453 |
| 1982 | 6.04 | 440 |
| 1981 | 5.96 | 428 |
| 1980 | 5.89 | 417 |
| 1979 | 5.83 | 407 |
| 1978 | 5.78 | 396 |
| 1977 | 5.73 | 385 |
| 1976 | 5.69 | 375 |
| 1975 | 5.63 | 366 |
| 1974 | 5.56 | 358 |
| 1973 | 5.49 | 350 |
| 1972 | 5.4 | 342 |
| 1971 | 5.32 | 334 |
| 1970 | 5.28 | 327 |
| 1969 | 5.25 | 318 |
| 1968 | 5.21 | 309 |
| 1967 | 5.13 | 301 |
| 1966 | 5.05 | 291.9 |
| 1965 | 4.97 | 283.3 |
| 1964 | 4.88 | 274.8 |
| 1963 | 4.8 | 266.4 |
| 1962 | 4.71 | 258.1 |
| 1961 | 4.63 | 250 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Iceland
|
Philippines
|
|
| 2024 | 94.1% | 48.6% |
| 2023 | 94% | 48.3% |
| 2022 | 94% | 48% |
| 2021 | 93.9% | 47.7% |
| 2020 | 93.9% | 47.4% |
| 2019 | 93.9% | 47.1% |
| 2018 | 93.8% | 46.9% |
| 2017 | 93.8% | 46.7% |
| 2016 | 93.7% | 46.5% |
| 2015 | 93.7% | 46.3% |
| 2014 | 93.7% | 46.1% |
| 2013 | 93.6% | 45.9% |
| 2012 | 93.6% | 45.7% |
| 2011 | 93.6% | 45.5% |
| 2010 | 93.6% | 45.3% |
| 2009 | 93.5% | 45.4% |
| 2008 | 93.4% | 45.5% |
| 2007 | 93.3% | 45.5% |
| 2006 | 93.2% | 45.6% |
| 2005 | 93% | 45.7% |
| 2004 | 92.9% | 45.8% |
| 2003 | 92.8% | 45.9% |
| 2002 | 92.7% | 46% |
| 2001 | 92.5% | 46% |
| 2000 | 92.4% | 46.1% |
| 1999 | 92.3% | 46.2% |
| 1998 | 92.1% | 46.3% |
| 1997 | 92% | 46.4% |
| 1996 | 91.8% | 46.5% |
| 1995 | 91.6% | 46.6% |
| 1994 | 91.5% | 46.6% |
| 1993 | 91.3% | 46.7% |
| 1992 | 91.1% | 46.8% |
| 1991 | 90.9% | 46.9% |
| 1990 | 90.8% | 47% |
| 1989 | 90.5% | 46.2% |
| 1988 | 90.3% | 45.2% |
| 1987 | 90.1% | 44.2% |
| 1986 | 89.8% | 43.2% |
| 1985 | 89.6% | 42.2% |
| 1984 | 89.3% | 41.3% |
| 1983 | 89.1% | 40.3% |
| 1982 | 88.8% | 39.3% |
| 1981 | 88.5% | 38.4% |
| 1980 | 88.3% | 37.5% |
| 1979 | 88% | 37% |
| 1978 | 87.6% | 36.6% |
| 1977 | 87.3% | 36.3% |
| 1976 | 87% | 35.9% |
| 1975 | 86.7% | 35.6% |
| 1974 | 86.3% | 35.1% |
| 1973 | 86% | 34.5% |
| 1972 | 85.6% | 34% |
| 1971 | 85.3% | 33.5% |
| 1970 | 84.9% | 33% |
| 1969 | 84.5% | 32.7% |
| 1968 | 84.1% | 32.4% |
| 1967 | 83.6% | 32.1% |
| 1966 | 83.2% | 31.9% |
| 1965 | 82.7% | 31.6% |
| 1964 | 82.3% | 31.3% |
| 1963 | 81.8% | 31.1% |
| 1962 | 81.3% | 30.8% |
| 1961 | 80.8% | 30.6% |
| 1960 | 80.3% | 30.3% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 92.9% to 94.1% in Iceland and from 45.8% to 48.6% in the Philippines.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
