Burkina Faso has a population density of 222.9 people per square mile compared to 10.4 people in Iceland. Burkina Faso has 125,334 sq ft of land per person vs 2,740,233 sq ft in Iceland. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Burkina Faso and Iceland are ranked 102nd and 192nd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Burkina Faso has 0.29% of the world's population and 0.18% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.005% of the population and 0.07% of the land area for Iceland, hence the population density in Burkina Faso is 2,045% higher than in Iceland.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 222.9 ppl/mi² | 10.4 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 102/197 | 192/197 |
| Population |
24497999
|
412970
|
| Land area | 105,638 sq mi | 38,931 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 125,060 sq ft | 2,682,398 sq ft |
| Rural population | 66.8% | 5.91% |
| Urban population | 33.2% | 94.1% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 10.4% | 0% |
Burkina Faso vs Iceland:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Burkina Faso increased by 74.4%, compared to a 37.7% growth in Iceland.
In 2004, Burkina Faso ranked 121st for population density and is in 102nd place now. Iceland was 188th in 2004 and ranks 192nd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 222.9 | 10.4 |
| 2023 | 218 | 10.1 |
| 2022 | 213.1 | 9.81 |
| 2021 | 208.2 | 9.57 |
| 2020 | 203.3 | 9.41 |
| 2019 | 198.4 | 9.26 |
| 2018 | 193.5 | 9.06 |
| 2017 | 188.3 | 8.87 |
| 2016 | 183 | 8.67 |
| 2015 | 177.8 | 8.55 |
| 2014 | 172.6 | 8.46 |
| 2013 | 167.5 | 8.36 |
| 2012 | 162.6 | 8.29 |
| 2011 | 157.7 | 8.24 |
| 2010 | 153.1 | 8.22 |
| 2009 | 148.7 | 8.23 |
| 2008 | 144.4 | 8.2 |
| 2007 | 140.3 | 8.05 |
| 2006 | 136.1 | 7.85 |
| 2005 | 131.9 | 7.67 |
| 2004 | 127.8 | 7.55 |
| 2003 | 123.8 | 7.48 |
| 2002 | 120 | 7.43 |
| 2001 | 116.4 | 7.36 |
| 2000 | 112.9 | 7.27 |
| 1999 | 109.6 | 7.17 |
| 1998 | 106.4 | 7.08 |
| 1997 | 103.5 | 7 |
| 1996 | 100.9 | 6.95 |
| 1995 | 98.3 | 6.91 |
| 1994 | 95.8 | 6.87 |
| 1993 | 93.4 | 6.81 |
| 1992 | 91.2 | 6.74 |
| 1991 | 88.9 | 6.66 |
| 1990 | 86.7 | 6.58 |
| 1989 | 84.5 | 6.53 |
| 1988 | 82.2 | 6.45 |
| 1987 | 80.1 | 6.35 |
| 1986 | 77.9 | 6.28 |
| 1985 | 75.7 | 6.24 |
| 1984 | 73.6 | 6.19 |
| 1983 | 71.5 | 6.12 |
| 1982 | 69.5 | 6.04 |
| 1981 | 67.6 | 5.96 |
| 1980 | 65.8 | 5.89 |
| 1979 | 64 | 5.83 |
| 1978 | 62.4 | 5.78 |
| 1977 | 60.9 | 5.73 |
| 1976 | 59.5 | 5.69 |
| 1975 | 58.2 | 5.63 |
| 1974 | 57 | 5.56 |
| 1973 | 56 | 5.49 |
| 1972 | 55 | 5.4 |
| 1971 | 54 | 5.32 |
| 1970 | 53.1 | 5.28 |
| 1969 | 52.2 | 5.25 |
| 1968 | 51.3 | 5.21 |
| 1967 | 50.4 | 5.13 |
| 1966 | 49.6 | 5.05 |
| 1965 | 48.8 | 4.97 |
| 1964 | 48 | 4.88 |
| 1963 | 47.3 | 4.8 |
| 1962 | 46.6 | 4.71 |
| 1961 | 45.9 | 4.63 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 33.2% | 94.1% |
| 2023 | 32.5% | 94% |
| 2022 | 31.9% | 94% |
| 2021 | 31.2% | 93.9% |
| 2020 | 30.6% | 93.9% |
| 2019 | 30% | 93.9% |
| 2018 | 29.4% | 93.8% |
| 2017 | 28.7% | 93.8% |
| 2016 | 28.1% | 93.7% |
| 2015 | 27.5% | 93.7% |
| 2014 | 26.9% | 93.7% |
| 2013 | 26.3% | 93.6% |
| 2012 | 25.8% | 93.6% |
| 2011 | 25.2% | 93.6% |
| 2010 | 24.6% | 93.6% |
| 2009 | 24.1% | 93.5% |
| 2008 | 23.5% | 93.4% |
| 2007 | 23% | 93.3% |
| 2006 | 22.3% | 93.2% |
| 2005 | 21.5% | 93% |
| 2004 | 20.8% | 92.9% |
| 2003 | 20% | 92.8% |
| 2002 | 19.3% | 92.7% |
| 2001 | 18.5% | 92.5% |
| 2000 | 17.8% | 92.4% |
| 1999 | 17.2% | 92.3% |
| 1998 | 16.5% | 92.1% |
| 1997 | 15.9% | 92% |
| 1996 | 15.4% | 91.8% |
| 1995 | 15.1% | 91.6% |
| 1994 | 14.9% | 91.5% |
| 1993 | 14.6% | 91.3% |
| 1992 | 14.3% | 91.1% |
| 1991 | 14.1% | 90.9% |
| 1990 | 13.8% | 90.8% |
| 1989 | 13.6% | 90.5% |
| 1988 | 13.3% | 90.3% |
| 1987 | 13.1% | 90.1% |
| 1986 | 12.8% | 89.8% |
| 1985 | 12.3% | 89.6% |
| 1984 | 11.5% | 89.3% |
| 1983 | 10.8% | 89.1% |
| 1982 | 10.1% | 88.8% |
| 1981 | 9.43% | 88.5% |
| 1980 | 8.81% | 88.3% |
| 1979 | 8.22% | 88% |
| 1978 | 7.67% | 87.6% |
| 1977 | 7.15% | 87.3% |
| 1976 | 6.67% | 87% |
| 1975 | 6.35% | 86.7% |
| 1974 | 6.22% | 86.3% |
| 1973 | 6.1% | 86% |
| 1972 | 5.98% | 85.6% |
| 1971 | 5.86% | 85.3% |
| 1970 | 5.75% | 84.9% |
| 1969 | 5.63% | 84.5% |
| 1968 | 5.52% | 84.1% |
| 1967 | 5.41% | 83.6% |
| 1966 | 5.3% | 83.2% |
| 1965 | 5.2% | 82.7% |
| 1964 | 5.09% | 82.3% |
| 1963 | 4.99% | 81.8% |
| 1962 | 4.89% | 81.3% |
| 1961 | 4.8% | 80.8% |
| 1960 | 4.7% | 80.3% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 20.8% to 33.2% in Burkina Faso and from 92.9% to 94.1% in Iceland.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Ouagadougou | 2.45M |
| Bobo-Dioulasso | 904K |
| Koudougou | 160K |
| Ouahigouya | 125K |
| Fada N'gourma | 73.2K |
| Dedougou | 63.6K |
| Leo | 51.7K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons