Curacao has a population density of 909 people per square mile compared to 10.4 people in Iceland. Curacao has 30,655 sq ft of land per person vs 2,740,233 sq ft in Iceland. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Curacao and Iceland are ranked 26th and 192nd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Curacao has 0.002% of the world's population and 0.0003% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.005% of the population and 0.07% of the land area for Iceland, hence the population density in Curacao is 8,650% higher than in Iceland.
Population density comparison
Curacao
|
Iceland
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 909 ppl/mi² | 10.4 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 26/197 | 192/197 |
| Population |
155910
|
412970
|
| Land area | 171.4 sq mi | 38,931 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 30,655 sq ft | 2,682,398 sq ft |
| Rural population | 11% | 5.91% |
| Urban population | 89% | 94.1% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Curacao vs Iceland:
Population density chart by year
From 2011 to 2024, population density in Curacao increased by 3.36%, compared to a 26.1% growth in Iceland.
In 2011, Curacao ranked 26th for population density and is in 26th place still. Iceland was 192nd in 2011 and still ranks 192nd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Curacao
|
Iceland
|
|
| 2024 | 909 | 10.4 |
| 2023 | 909 | 10.1 |
| 2022 | 875 | 9.81 |
| 2021 | 889 | 9.57 |
| 2020 | 904 | 9.41 |
| 2019 | 918 | 9.26 |
| 2018 | 929 | 9.06 |
| 2017 | 934 | 8.87 |
| 2016 | 931 | 8.67 |
| 2015 | 922 | 8.55 |
| 2014 | 909 | 8.46 |
| 2013 | 897 | 8.36 |
| 2012 | 887 | 8.29 |
| 2011 | 880 | 8.24 |
| 2010 | - | 8.22 |
| 2009 | - | 8.23 |
| 2008 | - | 8.2 |
| 2007 | - | 8.05 |
| 2006 | - | 7.85 |
| 2005 | - | 7.67 |
| 2004 | - | 7.55 |
| 2003 | - | 7.48 |
| 2002 | - | 7.43 |
| 2001 | - | 7.36 |
| 2000 | - | 7.27 |
| 1999 | - | 7.17 |
| 1998 | - | 7.08 |
| 1997 | - | 7 |
| 1996 | - | 6.95 |
| 1995 | - | 6.91 |
| 1994 | - | 6.87 |
| 1993 | - | 6.81 |
| 1992 | - | 6.74 |
| 1991 | - | 6.66 |
| 1990 | - | 6.58 |
| 1989 | - | 6.53 |
| 1988 | - | 6.45 |
| 1987 | - | 6.35 |
| 1986 | - | 6.28 |
| 1985 | - | 6.24 |
| 1984 | - | 6.19 |
| 1983 | - | 6.12 |
| 1982 | - | 6.04 |
| 1981 | - | 5.96 |
| 1980 | - | 5.89 |
| 1979 | - | 5.83 |
| 1978 | - | 5.78 |
| 1977 | - | 5.73 |
| 1976 | - | 5.69 |
| 1975 | - | 5.63 |
| 1974 | - | 5.56 |
| 1973 | - | 5.49 |
| 1972 | - | 5.4 |
| 1971 | - | 5.32 |
| 1970 | - | 5.28 |
| 1969 | - | 5.25 |
| 1968 | - | 5.21 |
| 1967 | - | 5.13 |
| 1966 | - | 5.05 |
| 1965 | - | 4.97 |
| 1964 | - | 4.88 |
| 1963 | - | 4.8 |
| 1962 | - | 4.71 |
| 1961 | - | 4.63 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Curacao
|
Iceland
|
|
| 2024 | 89% | 94.1% |
| 2023 | 89% | 94% |
| 2022 | 89% | 94% |
| 2021 | 89% | 93.9% |
| 2020 | 89.1% | 93.9% |
| 2019 | 89.1% | 93.9% |
| 2018 | 89.1% | 93.8% |
| 2017 | 89.2% | 93.8% |
| 2016 | 89.3% | 93.7% |
| 2015 | 89.4% | 93.7% |
| 2014 | 89.4% | 93.7% |
| 2013 | 89.5% | 93.6% |
| 2012 | 89.7% | 93.6% |
| 2011 | 89.8% | 93.6% |
| 2010 | 89.9% | 93.6% |
| 2009 | 90% | 93.5% |
| 2008 | 90.2% | 93.4% |
| 2007 | 90.3% | 93.3% |
| 2006 | 90.4% | 93.2% |
| 2005 | 90.5% | 93% |
| 2004 | 90.7% | 92.9% |
| 2003 | 90.8% | 92.8% |
| 2002 | 90.9% | 92.7% |
| 2001 | 91% | 92.5% |
| 2000 | 90.8% | 92.4% |
| 1999 | 90.2% | 92.3% |
| 1998 | 89.6% | 92.1% |
| 1997 | 89% | 92% |
| 1996 | 88.4% | 91.8% |
| 1995 | 87.7% | 91.6% |
| 1994 | 87% | 91.5% |
| 1993 | 86.2% | 91.3% |
| 1992 | 85.4% | 91.1% |
| 1991 | 84.9% | 90.9% |
| 1990 | 84.7% | 90.8% |
| 1989 | 84.4% | 90.5% |
| 1988 | 84.1% | 90.3% |
| 1987 | 83.8% | 90.1% |
| 1986 | 83.6% | 89.8% |
| 1985 | 83.3% | 89.6% |
| 1984 | 83% | 89.3% |
| 1983 | 82.7% | 89.1% |
| 1982 | 82.4% | 88.8% |
| 1981 | 82.1% | 88.5% |
| 1980 | 81.8% | 88.3% |
| 1979 | 81.5% | 88% |
| 1978 | 81.1% | 87.6% |
| 1977 | 80.8% | 87.3% |
| 1976 | 80.5% | 87% |
| 1975 | 80.2% | 86.7% |
| 1974 | 79.8% | 86.3% |
| 1973 | 79.5% | 86% |
| 1972 | 79.1% | 85.6% |
| 1971 | 78.8% | 85.3% |
| 1970 | 78.4% | 84.9% |
| 1969 | 78.1% | 84.5% |
| 1968 | 77.7% | 84.1% |
| 1967 | 77.4% | 83.6% |
| 1966 | 77% | 83.2% |
| 1965 | 76.6% | 82.7% |
| 1964 | 76.3% | 82.3% |
| 1963 | 75.9% | 81.8% |
| 1962 | 75.5% | 81.3% |
| 1961 | 75.1% | 80.8% |
| 1960 | 74.7% | 80.3% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 90.7% to 89% in Curacao and from 92.9% to 94.1% in Iceland.
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
