Guatemala has a population density of 445 people per square mile compared to 10.4 people in Iceland. Guatemala has 63,678 sq ft of land per person vs 2,740,233 sq ft in Iceland. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Guatemala and Iceland are ranked 60th and 192nd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Guatemala has 0.23% of the world's population and 0.07% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.005% of the population and 0.07% of the land area for Iceland, hence the population density in Guatemala is 4,180% higher than in Iceland.
Population density comparison
Guatemala
|
Iceland
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 445 ppl/mi² | 10.4 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 60/197 | 192/197 |
| Population |
18912872
|
412970
|
| Land area | 41,375 sq mi | 38,931 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 62,666 sq ft | 2,682,398 sq ft |
| Rural population | 46.5% | 5.91% |
| Urban population | 53.5% | 94.1% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 6.59% | 0% |
Guatemala vs Iceland:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Guatemala increased by 43.7%, compared to a 37.7% growth in Iceland.
In 2004, Guatemala ranked 64th for population density and is in 60th place now. Iceland was 188th in 2004 and ranks 192nd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Guatemala
|
Iceland
|
|
| 2024 | 445 | 10.4 |
| 2023 | 438 | 10.1 |
| 2022 | 431 | 9.81 |
| 2021 | 425 | 9.57 |
| 2020 | 420 | 9.41 |
| 2019 | 413 | 9.26 |
| 2018 | 407 | 9.06 |
| 2017 | 400 | 8.87 |
| 2016 | 393 | 8.67 |
| 2015 | 386 | 8.55 |
| 2014 | 379 | 8.46 |
| 2013 | 372 | 8.36 |
| 2012 | 365 | 8.29 |
| 2011 | 358 | 8.24 |
| 2010 | 350 | 8.22 |
| 2009 | 344 | 8.23 |
| 2008 | 337 | 8.2 |
| 2007 | 330 | 8.05 |
| 2006 | 323 | 7.85 |
| 2005 | 316 | 7.67 |
| 2004 | 310 | 7.55 |
| 2003 | 303 | 7.48 |
| 2002 | 296 | 7.43 |
| 2001 | 289.3 | 7.36 |
| 2000 | 282.7 | 7.27 |
| 1999 | 276.1 | 7.17 |
| 1998 | 269.2 | 7.08 |
| 1997 | 262.4 | 7 |
| 1996 | 255.8 | 6.95 |
| 1995 | 249.3 | 6.91 |
| 1994 | 242.8 | 6.87 |
| 1993 | 236.4 | 6.81 |
| 1992 | 230.1 | 6.74 |
| 1991 | 224.1 | 6.66 |
| 1990 | 218.1 | 6.58 |
| 1989 | 212.1 | 6.53 |
| 1988 | 206.2 | 6.45 |
| 1987 | 200.5 | 6.35 |
| 1986 | 195.1 | 6.28 |
| 1985 | 189.7 | 6.24 |
| 1984 | 184.4 | 6.19 |
| 1983 | 179.3 | 6.12 |
| 1982 | 175 | 6.04 |
| 1981 | 171 | 5.96 |
| 1980 | 166.8 | 5.89 |
| 1979 | 162.6 | 5.83 |
| 1978 | 158.6 | 5.78 |
| 1977 | 154.7 | 5.73 |
| 1976 | 151.4 | 5.69 |
| 1975 | 148.1 | 5.63 |
| 1974 | 144.6 | 5.56 |
| 1973 | 140.9 | 5.49 |
| 1972 | 137.4 | 5.4 |
| 1971 | 133.9 | 5.32 |
| 1970 | 130.4 | 5.28 |
| 1969 | 127.1 | 5.25 |
| 1968 | 123.7 | 5.21 |
| 1967 | 120.3 | 5.13 |
| 1966 | 117 | 5.05 |
| 1965 | 113.7 | 4.97 |
| 1964 | 110.5 | 4.88 |
| 1963 | 107.3 | 4.8 |
| 1962 | 104.2 | 4.71 |
| 1961 | 101.2 | 4.63 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Guatemala
|
Iceland
|
|
| 2024 | 53.5% | 94.1% |
| 2023 | 53.1% | 94% |
| 2022 | 52.7% | 94% |
| 2021 | 52.2% | 93.9% |
| 2020 | 51.8% | 93.9% |
| 2019 | 51.4% | 93.9% |
| 2018 | 51.1% | 93.8% |
| 2017 | 50.7% | 93.8% |
| 2016 | 50.3% | 93.7% |
| 2015 | 50% | 93.7% |
| 2014 | 49.6% | 93.7% |
| 2013 | 49.3% | 93.6% |
| 2012 | 49% | 93.6% |
| 2011 | 48.7% | 93.6% |
| 2010 | 48.4% | 93.6% |
| 2009 | 48.1% | 93.5% |
| 2008 | 47.8% | 93.4% |
| 2007 | 47.5% | 93.3% |
| 2006 | 47.2% | 93.2% |
| 2005 | 46.9% | 93% |
| 2004 | 46.6% | 92.9% |
| 2003 | 46.3% | 92.8% |
| 2002 | 46% | 92.7% |
| 2001 | 45.7% | 92.5% |
| 2000 | 45.3% | 92.4% |
| 1999 | 45% | 92.3% |
| 1998 | 44.7% | 92.1% |
| 1997 | 44.3% | 92% |
| 1996 | 44% | 91.8% |
| 1995 | 43.7% | 91.6% |
| 1994 | 43.3% | 91.5% |
| 1993 | 43% | 91.3% |
| 1992 | 42.7% | 91.1% |
| 1991 | 42.3% | 90.9% |
| 1990 | 42% | 90.8% |
| 1989 | 41.7% | 90.5% |
| 1988 | 41.3% | 90.3% |
| 1987 | 41% | 90.1% |
| 1986 | 40.7% | 89.8% |
| 1985 | 40.3% | 89.6% |
| 1984 | 40% | 89.3% |
| 1983 | 39.7% | 89.1% |
| 1982 | 39.4% | 88.8% |
| 1981 | 39% | 88.5% |
| 1980 | 38.7% | 88.3% |
| 1979 | 38.4% | 88% |
| 1978 | 38.1% | 87.6% |
| 1977 | 37.8% | 87.3% |
| 1976 | 37.4% | 87% |
| 1975 | 37.1% | 86.7% |
| 1974 | 36.8% | 86.3% |
| 1973 | 36.5% | 86% |
| 1972 | 36.2% | 85.6% |
| 1971 | 35.9% | 85.3% |
| 1970 | 35.5% | 84.9% |
| 1969 | 35.2% | 84.5% |
| 1968 | 34.9% | 84.1% |
| 1967 | 34.6% | 83.6% |
| 1966 | 34.3% | 83.2% |
| 1965 | 34% | 82.7% |
| 1964 | 33.7% | 82.3% |
| 1963 | 33.1% | 81.8% |
| 1962 | 32.4% | 81.3% |
| 1961 | 31.8% | 80.8% |
| 1960 | 31.1% | 80.3% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 46.6% to 53.5% in Guatemala and from 92.9% to 94.1% in Iceland.
Densely populated cities
|
Guatemala
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Guatemala | 1.21M |
| Mixco | 528K |
| Coban | 229K |
| Quetzaltenango | 208K |
| Jalapa | 193K |
| San Miguel Petapa | 151K |
| Momostenango | 140K |
| Mazatenango | 83.8K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
