Estonia has a population density of 83.2 people per square mile compared to 9.93 people in Iceland. Estonia has 355,584 sq ft of land per person vs 2,868,586 sq ft in Iceland. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Estonia and Iceland are ranked 152nd and 194th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Estonia has 0.02% of the world's population and 0.03% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.005% of the population and 0.07% of the land area for Iceland, hence the population density in Estonia is 738% higher than in Iceland.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 83.2 ppl/mi² | 9.93 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 152/197 | 194/197 |
| Population |
1342600
|
395314
|
| Land area | 16,498 sq mi | 38,931 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 335,151 sq ft | 2,808,042 sq ft |
| Rural population | 29.3% | 5.82% |
| Urban population | 70.7% | 94.2% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Estonia vs Iceland:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Estonia decreased by 0.08%, compared to a 31.6% growth in Iceland.
In 2004, Estonia ranked 141st for population density and is in 152nd place now. Iceland was 188th in 2004 and ranks 194th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 83.2 | 9.93 |
| 2023 | 83.1 | 9.91 |
| 2022 | 81.8 | 9.81 |
| 2021 | 80.6 | 9.57 |
| 2020 | 80.5 | 9.41 |
| 2019 | 80.4 | 9.26 |
| 2018 | 80.1 | 9.06 |
| 2017 | 79.8 | 8.87 |
| 2016 | 78.4 | 8.67 |
| 2015 | 78.4 | 8.55 |
| 2014 | 78.3 | 8.46 |
| 2013 | 78.5 | 8.36 |
| 2012 | 80.8 | 8.29 |
| 2011 | 81.1 | 8.24 |
| 2010 | 81.4 | 8.22 |
| 2009 | 81.5 | 8.23 |
| 2008 | 81.7 | 8.2 |
| 2007 | 81.9 | 8.05 |
| 2006 | 82.3 | 7.85 |
| 2005 | 82.8 | 7.67 |
| 2004 | 83.3 | 7.55 |
| 2003 | 83.7 | 7.48 |
| 2002 | 84.3 | 7.43 |
| 2001 | 84.8 | 7.36 |
| 2000 | 85.4 | 7.27 |
| 1999 | 84.9 | 7.17 |
| 1998 | 84.7 | 7.08 |
| 1997 | 85.5 | 7 |
| 1996 | 86.5 | 6.95 |
| 1995 | 87.8 | 6.91 |
| 1994 | 89.4 | 6.87 |
| 1993 | 91.3 | 6.81 |
| 1992 | 93.7 | 6.74 |
| 1991 | - | 6.66 |
| 1990 | - | 6.58 |
| 1989 | - | 6.53 |
| 1988 | - | 6.45 |
| 1987 | - | 6.35 |
| 1986 | - | 6.28 |
| 1985 | - | 6.24 |
| 1984 | - | 6.19 |
| 1983 | - | 6.12 |
| 1982 | - | 6.04 |
| 1981 | - | 5.96 |
| 1980 | - | 5.89 |
| 1979 | - | 5.83 |
| 1978 | - | 5.78 |
| 1977 | - | 5.73 |
| 1976 | - | 5.69 |
| 1975 | - | 5.63 |
| 1974 | - | 5.56 |
| 1973 | - | 5.49 |
| 1972 | - | 5.4 |
| 1971 | - | 5.32 |
| 1970 | - | 5.28 |
| 1969 | - | 5.25 |
| 1968 | - | 5.21 |
| 1967 | - | 5.13 |
| 1966 | - | 5.05 |
| 1965 | - | 4.97 |
| 1964 | - | 4.88 |
| 1963 | - | 4.8 |
| 1962 | - | 4.71 |
| 1961 | - | 4.63 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 70.7% | 94.2% |
| 2023 | 70.7% | 94.2% |
| 2022 | 70.5% | 94.2% |
| 2021 | 70.2% | 94.2% |
| 2020 | 69.9% | 94.1% |
| 2019 | 69.6% | 94% |
| 2018 | 69.3% | 93.9% |
| 2017 | 69% | 93.8% |
| 2016 | 68.7% | 93.8% |
| 2015 | 68.5% | 93.7% |
| 2014 | 68.3% | 93.6% |
| 2013 | 68.1% | 93.6% |
| 2012 | 68% | 93.5% |
| 2011 | 67.9% | 93.4% |
| 2010 | 67.8% | 93.5% |
| 2009 | 67.7% | 93.4% |
| 2008 | 67.7% | 93.1% |
| 2007 | 67.6% | 92.4% |
| 2006 | 67.6% | 92.2% |
| 2005 | 67.5% | 92.4% |
| 2004 | 67.5% | 92.4% |
| 2003 | 67.4% | 92.3% |
| 2002 | 67.4% | 92.2% |
| 2001 | 67.4% | 92% |
| 2000 | 67.4% | 92% |
| 1999 | 67.4% | 91.8% |
| 1998 | 67.7% | 91.7% |
| 1997 | 68% | 92% |
| 1996 | 68.4% | 91.8% |
| 1995 | 69% | 91.6% |
| 1994 | 69.5% | 91.4% |
| 1993 | 70% | 91.3% |
| 1992 | 70.5% | 91.1% |
| 1991 | 71% | 90.9% |
| 1990 | 71.3% | 90.6% |
| 1989 | 71.4% | 90.4% |
| 1988 | 71.4% | 90.1% |
| 1987 | 71.3% | 89.8% |
| 1986 | 71.2% | 89.6% |
| 1985 | 71.1% | 89.3% |
| 1984 | 71% | 89.1% |
| 1983 | 70.8% | 88.9% |
| 1982 | 70.6% | 88.6% |
| 1981 | 70.3% | 88.3% |
| 1980 | 70% | 88.1% |
| 1979 | 69.6% | 87.9% |
| 1978 | 69.2% | 87.7% |
| 1977 | 68.7% | 87.4% |
| 1976 | 68.2% | 87.2% |
| 1975 | 67.7% | 86.9% |
| 1974 | 67.2% | 86.5% |
| 1973 | 66.7% | 86.2% |
| 1972 | 66.1% | 85.7% |
| 1971 | 65.5% | 85.3% |
| 1970 | 65.2% | 85% |
| 1969 | 64.6% | 84.8% |
| 1968 | 64.2% | 84.4% |
| 1967 | 63.6% | 83.9% |
| 1966 | 63.1% | 83.5% |
| 1965 | 62.5% | 83.2% |
| 1964 | 61.7% | 82.7% |
| 1963 | 61% | 82% |
| 1962 | 60.1% | 81.5% |
| 1961 | 58.8% | 81% |
| 1960 | 57.6% | 80.4% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 67.5% to 70.7% in Estonia and from 92.4% to 94.2% in Iceland.
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons