Iceland has a population density of 10.4 people per square mile compared to 4,587 people in Maldives. Iceland has 2,740,233 sq ft of land per person vs 6,077 sq ft in Maldives. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Iceland and Maldives are ranked 192nd and 6th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Iceland has 0.005% of the world's population and 0.07% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.006% of the population and 0.0002% of the land area for Maldives, hence the population density in Iceland is 99.8% lower than in Maldives.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 10.4 ppl/mi² | 4,587 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 192/197 | 6/197 |
| Population |
412970
|
531152
|
| Land area | 38,931 sq mi | 115.1 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 2,682,398 sq ft | 6,077 sq ft |
| Rural population | 5.91% | 57.6% |
| Urban population | 94.1% | 42.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Iceland vs Maldives:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Iceland increased by 37.7%, compared to a 76.3% growth in Maldives.
In 2004, Iceland ranked 188th for population density and is in 192nd place now. Maldives was 7th in 2004 and ranks 6th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 10.4 | 4,587 |
| 2023 | 10.1 | 4,572 |
| 2022 | 9.81 | 4,525 |
| 2021 | 9.57 | 4,456 |
| 2020 | 9.41 | 4,335 |
| 2019 | 9.26 | 4,211 |
| 2018 | 9.06 | 4,084 |
| 2017 | 8.87 | 3,957 |
| 2016 | 8.67 | 3,827 |
| 2015 | 8.55 | 3,696 |
| 2014 | 8.46 | 3,571 |
| 2013 | 8.36 | 3,454 |
| 2012 | 8.29 | 3,340 |
| 2011 | 8.24 | 3,226 |
| 2010 | 8.22 | 3,115 |
| 2009 | 8.23 | 3,007 |
| 2008 | 8.2 | 2,902 |
| 2007 | 8.05 | 2,801 |
| 2006 | 7.85 | 2,710 |
| 2005 | 7.67 | 2,645 |
| 2004 | 7.55 | 2,602 |
| 2003 | 7.48 | 2,560 |
| 2002 | 7.43 | 2,518 |
| 2001 | 7.36 | 2,476 |
| 2000 | 7.27 | 2,435 |
| 1999 | 7.17 | 2,395 |
| 1998 | 7.08 | 2,354 |
| 1997 | 7 | 2,311 |
| 1996 | 6.95 | 2,265 |
| 1995 | 6.91 | 2,216 |
| 1994 | 6.87 | 2,165 |
| 1993 | 6.81 | 2,114 |
| 1992 | 6.74 | 2,059 |
| 1991 | 6.66 | 2,001 |
| 1990 | 6.58 | 1,940 |
| 1989 | 6.53 | 1,880 |
| 1988 | 6.45 | 1,821 |
| 1987 | 6.35 | 1,761 |
| 1986 | 6.28 | 1,700 |
| 1985 | 6.24 | 1,642 |
| 1984 | 6.19 | 1,590 |
| 1983 | 6.12 | 1,546 |
| 1982 | 6.04 | 1,505 |
| 1981 | 5.96 | 1,464 |
| 1980 | 5.89 | 1,423 |
| 1979 | 5.83 | 1,384 |
| 1978 | 5.78 | 1,348 |
| 1977 | 5.73 | 1,312 |
| 1976 | 5.69 | 1,274 |
| 1975 | 5.63 | 1,236 |
| 1974 | 5.56 | 1,200 |
| 1973 | 5.49 | 1,165 |
| 1972 | 5.4 | 1,131 |
| 1971 | 5.32 | 1,097 |
| 1970 | 5.28 | 1,064 |
| 1969 | 5.25 | 1,032 |
| 1968 | 5.21 | 1,002 |
| 1967 | 5.13 | 971 |
| 1966 | 5.05 | 937 |
| 1965 | 4.97 | 899 |
| 1964 | 4.88 | 869 |
| 1963 | 4.8 | 848 |
| 1962 | 4.71 | 827 |
| 1961 | 4.63 | 807 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 94.1% | 42.4% |
| 2023 | 94% | 42% |
| 2022 | 94% | 41.5% |
| 2021 | 93.9% | 41.1% |
| 2020 | 93.9% | 40.7% |
| 2019 | 93.9% | 40.2% |
| 2018 | 93.8% | 39.8% |
| 2017 | 93.8% | 39.4% |
| 2016 | 93.7% | 39% |
| 2015 | 93.7% | 38.5% |
| 2014 | 93.7% | 38.1% |
| 2013 | 93.6% | 37.7% |
| 2012 | 93.6% | 37.3% |
| 2011 | 93.6% | 36.8% |
| 2010 | 93.6% | 36.4% |
| 2009 | 93.5% | 36% |
| 2008 | 93.4% | 35.6% |
| 2007 | 93.3% | 35.2% |
| 2006 | 93.2% | 34.8% |
| 2005 | 93% | 33.8% |
| 2004 | 92.9% | 32.5% |
| 2003 | 92.8% | 31.3% |
| 2002 | 92.7% | 30% |
| 2001 | 92.5% | 28.9% |
| 2000 | 92.4% | 27.7% |
| 1999 | 92.3% | 27.1% |
| 1998 | 92.1% | 26.8% |
| 1997 | 92% | 26.4% |
| 1996 | 91.8% | 26% |
| 1995 | 91.6% | 25.6% |
| 1994 | 91.5% | 25.6% |
| 1993 | 91.3% | 25.6% |
| 1992 | 91.1% | 25.7% |
| 1991 | 90.9% | 25.8% |
| 1990 | 90.8% | 25.8% |
| 1989 | 90.5% | 25.8% |
| 1988 | 90.3% | 25.7% |
| 1987 | 90.1% | 25.6% |
| 1986 | 89.8% | 25.6% |
| 1985 | 89.6% | 25.5% |
| 1984 | 89.3% | 25% |
| 1983 | 89.1% | 24.3% |
| 1982 | 88.8% | 23.6% |
| 1981 | 88.5% | 22.9% |
| 1980 | 88.3% | 22.3% |
| 1979 | 88% | 21.6% |
| 1978 | 87.6% | 21% |
| 1977 | 87.3% | 20% |
| 1976 | 87% | 18.6% |
| 1975 | 86.7% | 17.3% |
| 1974 | 86.3% | 16.1% |
| 1973 | 86% | 14.9% |
| 1972 | 85.6% | 13.9% |
| 1971 | 85.3% | 12.8% |
| 1970 | 84.9% | 11.9% |
| 1969 | 84.5% | 11.7% |
| 1968 | 84.1% | 11.5% |
| 1967 | 83.6% | 11.3% |
| 1966 | 83.2% | 11.4% |
| 1965 | 82.7% | 11.5% |
| 1964 | 82.3% | 11.4% |
| 1963 | 81.8% | 11.3% |
| 1962 | 81.3% | 11.3% |
| 1961 | 80.8% | 11.2% |
| 1960 | 80.3% | 11.2% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 92.9% to 94.1% in Iceland and from 32.5% to 42.4% in Maldives.
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons