Australia has a population density of 9.16 people per square mile compared to 174.4 people in Mexico. Australia has 3,043,442 sq ft of land per person vs 162,251 sq ft in Mexico. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Australia and Mexico are ranked 196th and 123rd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Australia has 0.33% of the world's population and 5.16% of the land area of all countries, compared to 1.61% of the population and 1.31% of the land area for Mexico, hence the population density in Australia is 94.7% lower than in Mexico.
Population density comparison
Australia
|
Mexico
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 9.16 ppl/mi² | 174.4 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 196/197 | 123/197 |
| Population |
27677455
|
132790957
|
| Land area | 2,969,906 sq mi | 750,563 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 3,043,440 sq ft | 159,899 sq ft |
| Rural population | 13.2% | 18.1% |
| Urban population | 86.8% | 81.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 62.6% | 17.3% |
Australia vs Mexico:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Australia increased by 36.3%, compared to a 25.4% growth in Mexico.
In 2004, Australia ranked 190th for population density and is in 196th place now. Mexico was 120th in 2004 and ranks 123rd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Australia
|
Mexico
|
|
| 2024 | 9.16 | 174.4 |
| 2023 | 8.97 | 172.9 |
| 2022 | 8.76 | 171.4 |
| 2021 | 8.65 | 170.1 |
| 2020 | 8.64 | 168.9 |
| 2019 | 8.53 | 167.6 |
| 2018 | 8.41 | 166 |
| 2017 | 8.28 | 164.4 |
| 2016 | 8.15 | 162.9 |
| 2015 | 8.03 | 161.3 |
| 2014 | 7.91 | 159.6 |
| 2013 | 7.8 | 157.7 |
| 2012 | 7.66 | 155.6 |
| 2011 | 7.53 | 153.5 |
| 2010 | 7.43 | 151.4 |
| 2009 | 7.31 | 149.2 |
| 2008 | 7.16 | 147.1 |
| 2007 | 7.02 | 144.9 |
| 2006 | 6.89 | 142.9 |
| 2005 | 6.8 | 141 |
| 2004 | 6.72 | 139.1 |
| 2003 | 6.65 | 137.2 |
| 2002 | 6.57 | 135.3 |
| 2001 | 6.5 | 133.4 |
| 2000 | 6.42 | 131.4 |
| 1999 | 6.34 | 129.4 |
| 1998 | 6.27 | 127.3 |
| 1997 | 6.21 | 125.3 |
| 1996 | 6.14 | 123.2 |
| 1995 | 6.07 | 121.1 |
| 1994 | 6 | 118.9 |
| 1993 | 5.95 | 116.8 |
| 1992 | 5.89 | 114.6 |
| 1991 | 5.83 | 112.5 |
| 1990 | 5.75 | 110.3 |
| 1989 | 5.67 | 108.2 |
| 1988 | 5.57 | 106.2 |
| 1987 | 5.48 | 104.1 |
| 1986 | 5.4 | 102 |
| 1985 | 5.32 | 100 |
| 1984 | 5.25 | 97.9 |
| 1983 | 5.19 | 95.9 |
| 1982 | 5.12 | 93.8 |
| 1981 | 5.03 | 91.8 |
| 1980 | 4.95 | 89.7 |
| 1979 | 4.89 | 87.5 |
| 1978 | 4.84 | 85.2 |
| 1977 | 4.78 | 83 |
| 1976 | 4.73 | 80.8 |
| 1975 | 4.68 | 78.6 |
| 1974 | 4.63 | 76.4 |
| 1973 | 4.51 | 74.2 |
| 1972 | 4.44 | 72 |
| 1971 | 4.36 | 69.8 |
| 1970 | 4.22 | 67.7 |
| 1969 | 4.13 | 65.6 |
| 1968 | 4.05 | 63.5 |
| 1967 | 3.98 | 61.5 |
| 1966 | 3.93 | 59.5 |
| 1965 | 3.84 | 57.5 |
| 1964 | 3.76 | 55.7 |
| 1963 | 3.69 | 53.9 |
| 1962 | 3.62 | 52.1 |
| 1961 | 3.53 | 50.5 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Australia
|
Mexico
|
|
| 2024 | 86.8% | 81.9% |
| 2023 | 86.6% | 81.6% |
| 2022 | 86.5% | 81.3% |
| 2021 | 86.4% | 81% |
| 2020 | 86.2% | 80.7% |
| 2019 | 86.1% | 80.4% |
| 2018 | 86% | 80.2% |
| 2017 | 85.9% | 79.9% |
| 2016 | 85.8% | 79.6% |
| 2015 | 85.7% | 79.3% |
| 2014 | 85.6% | 79% |
| 2013 | 85.5% | 78.7% |
| 2012 | 85.4% | 78.4% |
| 2011 | 85.3% | 78.1% |
| 2010 | 85.2% | 77.8% |
| 2009 | 85.1% | 77.5% |
| 2008 | 84.9% | 77.2% |
| 2007 | 84.8% | 76.9% |
| 2006 | 84.7% | 76.6% |
| 2005 | 84.6% | 76.3% |
| 2004 | 84.5% | 76% |
| 2003 | 84.3% | 75.7% |
| 2002 | 84.2% | 75.4% |
| 2001 | 84.1% | 75% |
| 2000 | 84.2% | 74.7% |
| 1999 | 84.4% | 74.4% |
| 1998 | 84.5% | 74.2% |
| 1997 | 84.6% | 73.9% |
| 1996 | 84.8% | 73.7% |
| 1995 | 84.9% | 73.4% |
| 1994 | 85% | 73% |
| 1993 | 85.2% | 72.6% |
| 1992 | 85.3% | 72.2% |
| 1991 | 85.4% | 71.8% |
| 1990 | 85.4% | 71.4% |
| 1989 | 85.5% | 71% |
| 1988 | 85.5% | 70.5% |
| 1987 | 85.5% | 70% |
| 1986 | 85.6% | 69.5% |
| 1985 | 85.6% | 69% |
| 1984 | 85.6% | 68.4% |
| 1983 | 85.6% | 67.9% |
| 1982 | 85.7% | 67.4% |
| 1981 | 85.7% | 66.9% |
| 1980 | 85.6% | 66.3% |
| 1979 | 85.4% | 65.6% |
| 1978 | 85.3% | 64.9% |
| 1977 | 85.1% | 64.2% |
| 1976 | 84.9% | 63.5% |
| 1975 | 84.8% | 62.8% |
| 1974 | 84.6% | 62% |
| 1973 | 84.5% | 61.3% |
| 1972 | 84.3% | 60.5% |
| 1971 | 84.2% | 59.8% |
| 1970 | 84% | 59% |
| 1969 | 83.8% | 58.2% |
| 1968 | 83.7% | 57.4% |
| 1967 | 83.5% | 56.6% |
| 1966 | 83.3% | 55.8% |
| 1965 | 83.1% | 54.9% |
| 1964 | 82.8% | 54.1% |
| 1963 | 82.5% | 53.3% |
| 1962 | 82.2% | 52.4% |
| 1961 | 81.9% | 51.6% |
| 1960 | 81.5% | 50.8% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 84.5% to 86.8% in Australia and from 76% to 81.9% in Mexico.
Densely populated cities
|
Australia
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Sydney | 5.45M |
| Melbourne | 5.35M |
| Brisbane | 2.71M |
| Perth | 2.14M |
| Adelaide | 1.39M |
| Gold Coast | 608K |
| Canberra | 381K |
| Sunshine Coast | 284K |
| Wollongong | 262K |
| Ipswich | 233K |
|
Mexico
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Mexico | 9.21M |
| Tijuana | 1.96M |
| Ecatepec de Morelos | 1.93M |
| Leon | 1.58M |
| Zapopan | 1.48M |
| Guadalajara | 1.46M |
| Puebla | 1.43M |
| Ciudad Juarez | 1.32M |
| Monterrey | 1.14M |
| Ciudad Nezahualcoyotl | 1.07M |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
