Australia has a population density of 9.16 people per square mile compared to 19.8 people in Kazakhstan. Australia has 3,043,442 sq ft of land per person vs 1,424,328 sq ft in Kazakhstan. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Australia and Kazakhstan are ranked 196th and 187th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Australia has 0.33% of the world's population and 5.16% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.25% of the population and 1.81% of the land area for Kazakhstan, hence the population density in Australia is 53.6% lower than in Kazakhstan.
Population density comparison
Australia
|
Kazakhstan
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 9.16 ppl/mi² | 19.8 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 196/197 | 187/197 |
| Population |
27677455
|
21036432
|
| Land area | 2,969,906 sq mi | 1,042,360 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 3,043,440 sq ft | 1,411,156 sq ft |
| Rural population | 13.2% | 41.6% |
| Urban population | 86.8% | 58.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 62.6% | 21.8% |
Australia vs Kazakhstan:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Australia increased by 36.3%, compared to a 29.9% growth in Kazakhstan.
In 2004, Australia ranked 190th for population density and is in 196th place now. Kazakhstan was 181st in 2004 and ranks 187th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Australia
|
Kazakhstan
|
|
| 2024 | 9.16 | 19.8 |
| 2023 | 8.97 | 19.5 |
| 2022 | 8.76 | 19.2 |
| 2021 | 8.65 | 18.9 |
| 2020 | 8.64 | 18.7 |
| 2019 | 8.53 | 18.4 |
| 2018 | 8.41 | 18.2 |
| 2017 | 8.28 | 17.9 |
| 2016 | 8.15 | 17.6 |
| 2015 | 8.03 | 17.3 |
| 2014 | 7.91 | 17.1 |
| 2013 | 7.8 | 16.8 |
| 2012 | 7.66 | 16.6 |
| 2011 | 7.53 | 16.4 |
| 2010 | 7.43 | 16.2 |
| 2009 | 7.31 | 15.9 |
| 2008 | 7.16 | 15.8 |
| 2007 | 7.02 | 15.6 |
| 2006 | 6.89 | 15.4 |
| 2005 | 6.8 | 15.3 |
| 2004 | 6.72 | 15.2 |
| 2003 | 6.65 | 15.1 |
| 2002 | 6.57 | 15 |
| 2001 | 6.5 | 14.9 |
| 2000 | 6.42 | 14.9 |
| 1999 | 6.34 | 14.8 |
| 1998 | 6.27 | 15 |
| 1997 | 6.21 | 15.4 |
| 1996 | 6.14 | 15.7 |
| 1995 | 6.07 | 16.1 |
| 1994 | 6 | 16.4 |
| 1993 | 5.95 | 16.6 |
| 1992 | 5.89 | 16.6 |
| 1991 | 5.83 | - |
| 1990 | 5.75 | - |
| 1989 | 5.67 | - |
| 1988 | 5.57 | - |
| 1987 | 5.48 | - |
| 1986 | 5.4 | - |
| 1985 | 5.32 | - |
| 1984 | 5.25 | - |
| 1983 | 5.19 | - |
| 1982 | 5.12 | - |
| 1981 | 5.03 | - |
| 1980 | 4.95 | - |
| 1979 | 4.89 | - |
| 1978 | 4.84 | - |
| 1977 | 4.78 | - |
| 1976 | 4.73 | - |
| 1975 | 4.68 | - |
| 1974 | 4.63 | - |
| 1973 | 4.51 | - |
| 1972 | 4.44 | - |
| 1971 | 4.36 | - |
| 1970 | 4.22 | - |
| 1969 | 4.13 | - |
| 1968 | 4.05 | - |
| 1967 | 3.98 | - |
| 1966 | 3.93 | - |
| 1965 | 3.84 | - |
| 1964 | 3.76 | - |
| 1963 | 3.69 | - |
| 1962 | 3.62 | - |
| 1961 | 3.53 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Australia
|
Kazakhstan
|
|
| 2024 | 86.8% | 58.4% |
| 2023 | 86.6% | 58.2% |
| 2022 | 86.5% | 58% |
| 2021 | 86.4% | 57.8% |
| 2020 | 86.2% | 57.7% |
| 2019 | 86.1% | 57.5% |
| 2018 | 86% | 57.4% |
| 2017 | 85.9% | 57.3% |
| 2016 | 85.8% | 57.3% |
| 2015 | 85.7% | 57.2% |
| 2014 | 85.6% | 57.1% |
| 2013 | 85.5% | 57% |
| 2012 | 85.4% | 57% |
| 2011 | 85.3% | 56.9% |
| 2010 | 85.2% | 56.8% |
| 2009 | 85.1% | 56.8% |
| 2008 | 84.9% | 56.7% |
| 2007 | 84.8% | 56.6% |
| 2006 | 84.7% | 56.5% |
| 2005 | 84.6% | 56.5% |
| 2004 | 84.5% | 56.4% |
| 2003 | 84.3% | 56.3% |
| 2002 | 84.2% | 56.2% |
| 2001 | 84.1% | 56.2% |
| 2000 | 84.2% | 56.1% |
| 1999 | 84.4% | 56% |
| 1998 | 84.5% | 56% |
| 1997 | 84.6% | 56% |
| 1996 | 84.8% | 55.9% |
| 1995 | 84.9% | 55.9% |
| 1994 | 85% | 55.9% |
| 1993 | 85.2% | 56% |
| 1992 | 85.3% | 56.1% |
| 1991 | 85.4% | 56.2% |
| 1990 | 85.4% | 56.3% |
| 1989 | 85.5% | 56.4% |
| 1988 | 85.5% | 56.3% |
| 1987 | 85.5% | 56.2% |
| 1986 | 85.6% | 56.1% |
| 1985 | 85.6% | 56% |
| 1984 | 85.6% | 55.9% |
| 1983 | 85.6% | 55.5% |
| 1982 | 85.7% | 55% |
| 1981 | 85.7% | 54.6% |
| 1980 | 85.6% | 54.1% |
| 1979 | 85.4% | 53.7% |
| 1978 | 85.3% | 53.4% |
| 1977 | 85.1% | 53.1% |
| 1976 | 84.9% | 52.8% |
| 1975 | 84.8% | 52.6% |
| 1974 | 84.6% | 52.3% |
| 1973 | 84.5% | 51.8% |
| 1972 | 84.3% | 51.3% |
| 1971 | 84.2% | 50.8% |
| 1970 | 84% | 50.2% |
| 1969 | 83.8% | 49.6% |
| 1968 | 83.7% | 49% |
| 1967 | 83.5% | 48.3% |
| 1966 | 83.3% | 47.7% |
| 1965 | 83.1% | 47% |
| 1964 | 82.8% | 46.4% |
| 1963 | 82.5% | 45.8% |
| 1962 | 82.2% | 45.3% |
| 1961 | 81.9% | 44.7% |
| 1960 | 81.5% | 44.2% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 84.5% to 86.8% in Australia and from 56.4% to 58.4% in Kazakhstan.
Densely populated cities
|
Australia
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Sydney | 5.45M |
| Melbourne | 5.35M |
| Brisbane | 2.71M |
| Perth | 2.14M |
| Adelaide | 1.39M |
| Gold Coast | 608K |
| Canberra | 381K |
| Sunshine Coast | 284K |
| Wollongong | 262K |
| Ipswich | 233K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
