Australia has a population density of 9.34 people per square mile compared to 910 people in Curacao. Australia has 3,044,337 sq ft of land per person vs 30,642 sq ft in Curacao. Australia and Curacao rank 196th and 26th by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Australia has 0.33% of the world's population and 5.16% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.002% of the population and 0.0003% of the land area for Curacao, making the population density in Australia 99% lower than in Curacao.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
Australia
|
Curacao
|
|
| 2026 | 9.34 | 910 |
| 2025 | 9.25 | 910 |
| 2024 | 9.16 | 910 |
| 2023 | 8.98 | 902 |
| 2022 | 8.76 | 894 |
| 2021 | 8.65 | 898 |
| 2020 | 8.64 | 907 |
| 2019 | 8.53 | 918 |
| 2018 | 8.41 | 929 |
| 2017 | 8.28 | 934 |
| 2016 | 8.15 | 931 |
| 2015 | 8.03 | 922 |
| 2014 | 7.91 | 909 |
| 2013 | 7.8 | 897 |
| 2012 | 7.66 | 887 |
| 2011 | 7.53 | 880 |
| 2010 | 7.43 | - |
| 2009 | 7.31 | - |
| 2008 | 7.16 | - |
| 2007 | 7.02 | - |
| 2006 | 6.89 | - |
| 2005 | 6.8 | - |
| 2004 | 6.72 | - |
| 2003 | 6.65 | - |
| 2002 | 6.57 | - |
| 2001 | 6.5 | - |
| 2000 | 6.42 | - |
| 1999 | 6.34 | - |
| 1998 | 6.27 | - |
| 1997 | 6.21 | - |
| 1996 | 6.14 | - |
| 1995 | 6.07 | - |
| 1994 | 6 | - |
| 1993 | 5.95 | - |
| 1992 | 5.89 | - |
| 1991 | 5.83 | - |
| 1990 | 5.75 | - |
| 1989 | 5.67 | - |
| 1988 | 5.57 | - |
| 1987 | 5.48 | - |
| 1986 | 5.4 | - |
| 1985 | 5.32 | - |
| 1984 | 5.25 | - |
| 1983 | 5.19 | - |
| 1982 | 5.12 | - |
| 1981 | 5.03 | - |
| 1980 | 4.95 | - |
| 1979 | 4.89 | - |
| 1978 | 4.84 | - |
| 1977 | 4.78 | - |
| 1976 | 4.73 | - |
| 1975 | 4.68 | - |
| 1974 | 4.63 | - |
| 1973 | 4.51 | - |
| 1972 | 4.44 | - |
| 1971 | 4.36 | - |
| 1970 | 4.22 | - |
| 1969 | 4.13 | - |
| 1968 | 4.05 | - |
| 1967 | 3.98 | - |
| 1966 | 3.93 | - |
| 1965 | 3.84 | - |
| 1964 | 3.76 | - |
| 1963 | 3.69 | - |
| 1962 | 3.62 | - |
| 1961 | 3.53 | - |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (2025–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/australia/curacao | CC BY 
From 2011 to 2026, population density in Australia increased by 24%, compared to a 3.41% growth in Curacao.
In 2011, Australia ranked 193rd by population density and is 196th now. Curacao was 26th in 2011 and still ranks 26th out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
Australia
|
Curacao
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 9.34 ppl/mi² | 910 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 196/197 | 26/197 |
| Population |
27799169
|
155976
|
| Land area | 2,969,906 sq mi | 171.4 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 3,044,335 sq ft | 30,642 sq ft |
| Rural population | 12.4% | 8.57% |
| Urban population | 87.6% | 91.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 61.3% | 0% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Australia
|
Curacao
|
|
| 2024 | 87.6% | 91.4% |
| 2023 | 87.5% | 91.4% |
| 2022 | 87.3% | 91.4% |
| 2021 | 87.2% | 91.4% |
| 2020 | 87.3% | 91.4% |
| 2019 | 87.3% | 91.4% |
| 2018 | 87.2% | 91.4% |
| 2017 | 87.1% | 91.3% |
| 2016 | 87% | 91.3% |
| 2015 | 86.9% | 91.3% |
| 2014 | 86.7% | 91.3% |
| 2013 | 86.6% | 91.3% |
| 2012 | 86.4% | 91.3% |
| 2011 | 86.3% | 91.3% |
| 2010 | 86.2% | 91.2% |
| 2009 | 86.1% | 91.2% |
| 2008 | 86% | 91.2% |
| 2007 | 85.9% | 91.2% |
| 2006 | 85.7% | 91.2% |
| 2005 | 85.6% | 91.2% |
| 2004 | 85.5% | 91.2% |
| 2003 | 85.4% | 91.1% |
| 2002 | 85.3% | 91.1% |
| 2001 | 85.1% | 91.1% |
| 2000 | 85.1% | 90.9% |
| 1999 | 85.1% | 90.4% |
| 1998 | 85.2% | 89.8% |
| 1997 | 85.2% | 89% |
| 1996 | 85.2% | 88.1% |
| 1995 | 85.3% | 87.2% |
| 1994 | 85.3% | 86.4% |
| 1993 | 85.4% | 85.7% |
| 1992 | 85.4% | 85.1% |
| 1991 | 85.4% | 84.7% |
| 1990 | 85.4% | 84.2% |
| 1989 | 85.4% | 83.9% |
| 1988 | 85.4% | 83.5% |
| 1987 | 85.4% | 83.2% |
| 1986 | 85.4% | 82.8% |
| 1985 | 85.4% | 82.5% |
| 1984 | 85.4% | 82.2% |
| 1983 | 85.5% | 82% |
| 1982 | 85.6% | 81.7% |
| 1981 | 85.7% | 81.5% |
| 1980 | 85.8% | 81.2% |
| 1979 | 85.9% | 81% |
| 1978 | 85.9% | 80.7% |
| 1977 | 86% | 80.5% |
| 1976 | 86% | 80.3% |
| 1975 | 86% | 80.1% |
| 1974 | 85.9% | 79.8% |
| 1973 | 85.8% | 79.6% |
| 1972 | 85.7% | 79.3% |
| 1971 | 85.6% | 79.1% |
| 1970 | 85.3% | 78.8% |
| 1969 | 84.8% | 78.5% |
| 1968 | 84.2% | 78.3% |
| 1967 | 83.6% | 77.9% |
| 1966 | 83.2% | 77.6% |
| 1965 | 82.9% | 77.3% |
| 1964 | 82.7% | 76.9% |
| 1963 | 82.5% | 76.5% |
| 1962 | 82.2% | 76.1% |
| 1961 | 81.9% | 75.6% |
| 1960 | 81.6% | 75.2% |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/australia/curacao | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 85.5% to 87.6% in Australia and from 91.2% to 91.4% in Curacao.
Densely populated cities
|
Australia
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Sydney | 5.45M |
| Melbourne | 5.35M |
| Brisbane | 2.71M |
| Perth | 2.14M |
| Adelaide | 1.39M |
| Gold Coast | 608K |
| Canberra | 381K |
| Sunshine Coast | 284K |
| Wollongong | 262K |
| Ipswich | 233K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/australia/curacao | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2014–2024, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.