New Zealand has a population density of 52.5 people per square mile compared to 74.3 people in Zambia. New Zealand has 540,405 sq ft of land per person vs 380,067 sq ft in Zambia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, New Zealand and Zambia are ranked 168th and 158th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. New Zealand has 0.07% of the world's population and 0.18% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.26% of the population and 0.5% of the land area for Zambia, hence the population density in New Zealand is 29.3% lower than in Zambia.
Population density comparison
New Zealand
|
Zambia
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 52.5 ppl/mi² | 74.3 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 168/197 | 158/197 |
| Population |
5406623
|
22402291
|
| Land area | 101,665 sq mi | 287,024 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 530,907 sq ft | 375,407 sq ft |
| Rural population | 12.9% | 53.1% |
| Urban population | 87.1% | 46.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 27.5% | 11.6% |
New Zealand vs Zambia:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in New Zealand increased by 30.6%, compared to a 88% growth in Zambia.
In 2004, New Zealand ranked 162nd for population density and is in 168th place now. Zambia was 163rd in 2004 and ranks 158th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
New Zealand
|
Zambia
|
|
| 2024 | 52.5 | 74.3 |
| 2023 | 51.6 | 72.2 |
| 2022 | 50.3 | 70.2 |
| 2021 | 50.3 | 68.3 |
| 2020 | 50.1 | 66.4 |
| 2019 | 49 | 64.5 |
| 2018 | 48.2 | 62.6 |
| 2017 | 47.3 | 60.8 |
| 2016 | 46.4 | 58.9 |
| 2015 | 45.3 | 57.1 |
| 2014 | 44.4 | 55.4 |
| 2013 | 43.7 | 53.7 |
| 2012 | 43.4 | 52 |
| 2011 | 43.1 | 50.3 |
| 2010 | 42.8 | 48.7 |
| 2009 | 42.3 | 47 |
| 2008 | 41.9 | 45.4 |
| 2007 | 41.5 | 43.8 |
| 2006 | 41.2 | 42.3 |
| 2005 | 40.7 | 40.8 |
| 2004 | 40.2 | 39.5 |
| 2003 | 39.6 | 38.3 |
| 2002 | 38.8 | 37.1 |
| 2001 | 38.2 | 36 |
| 2000 | 37.9 | 34.9 |
| 1999 | 37.7 | 33.9 |
| 1998 | 37.5 | 33 |
| 1997 | 37.2 | 32.2 |
| 1996 | 36.7 | 31.4 |
| 1995 | 36.1 | 30.6 |
| 1994 | 35.6 | 29.9 |
| 1993 | 35.1 | 29.2 |
| 1992 | 34.7 | 28.5 |
| 1991 | 34.4 | 27.8 |
| 1990 | 32.8 | 27.1 |
| 1989 | 32.5 | 26.4 |
| 1988 | 32.3 | 25.8 |
| 1987 | 32.2 | 25.1 |
| 1986 | 31.9 | 24.3 |
| 1985 | 31.9 | 23.6 |
| 1984 | 31.7 | 22.9 |
| 1983 | 31.5 | 22.2 |
| 1982 | 31 | 21.5 |
| 1981 | 30.7 | 20.8 |
| 1980 | 30.6 | 20.2 |
| 1979 | 30.6 | 19.6 |
| 1978 | 30.7 | 19 |
| 1977 | 30.7 | 18.5 |
| 1976 | 30.6 | 17.9 |
| 1975 | 30.3 | 17.4 |
| 1974 | 29.7 | 16.9 |
| 1973 | 29.1 | 16.4 |
| 1972 | 28.6 | 15.9 |
| 1971 | 28.1 | 15.5 |
| 1970 | 27.6 | 15.1 |
| 1969 | 27.3 | 14.6 |
| 1968 | 27 | 14.2 |
| 1967 | 26.8 | 13.7 |
| 1966 | 26.3 | 13.3 |
| 1965 | 25.9 | 12.9 |
| 1964 | 25.4 | 12.5 |
| 1963 | 24.9 | 12.1 |
| 1962 | 24.4 | 11.7 |
| 1961 | 23.8 | 11.3 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
New Zealand
|
Zambia
|
|
| 2024 | 87.1% | 46.9% |
| 2023 | 87% | 46.3% |
| 2022 | 86.9% | 45.8% |
| 2021 | 86.8% | 45.2% |
| 2020 | 86.7% | 44.6% |
| 2019 | 86.6% | 44.1% |
| 2018 | 86.5% | 43.5% |
| 2017 | 86.5% | 43% |
| 2016 | 86.4% | 42.4% |
| 2015 | 86.3% | 41.9% |
| 2014 | 86.3% | 41.4% |
| 2013 | 86.2% | 40.9% |
| 2012 | 86.2% | 40.4% |
| 2011 | 86.1% | 39.9% |
| 2010 | 86.2% | 39.4% |
| 2009 | 86.2% | 38.9% |
| 2008 | 86.3% | 38.4% |
| 2007 | 86.3% | 37.9% |
| 2006 | 86.4% | 37.4% |
| 2005 | 86.3% | 36.9% |
| 2004 | 86.3% | 36.4% |
| 2003 | 86.2% | 36% |
| 2002 | 86.2% | 35.5% |
| 2001 | 86.1% | 35% |
| 2000 | 86% | 34.8% |
| 1999 | 85.9% | 35.3% |
| 1998 | 85.9% | 35.7% |
| 1997 | 85.8% | 36.2% |
| 1996 | 85.7% | 36.6% |
| 1995 | 85.6% | 37.1% |
| 1994 | 85.4% | 37.6% |
| 1993 | 85.3% | 38% |
| 1992 | 85.1% | 38.5% |
| 1991 | 84.9% | 39% |
| 1990 | 84.7% | 39.4% |
| 1989 | 84.5% | 39.5% |
| 1988 | 84.3% | 39.5% |
| 1987 | 84% | 39.6% |
| 1986 | 83.8% | 39.6% |
| 1985 | 83.7% | 39.7% |
| 1984 | 83.6% | 39.7% |
| 1983 | 83.6% | 39.8% |
| 1982 | 83.6% | 39.8% |
| 1981 | 83.5% | 39.9% |
| 1980 | 83.4% | 39.8% |
| 1979 | 83.3% | 38.8% |
| 1978 | 83.2% | 37.8% |
| 1977 | 83.1% | 36.9% |
| 1976 | 83% | 35.9% |
| 1975 | 82.8% | 34.9% |
| 1974 | 82.5% | 34% |
| 1973 | 82.1% | 33.1% |
| 1972 | 81.8% | 32.1% |
| 1971 | 81.5% | 31.2% |
| 1970 | 81.1% | 30.4% |
| 1969 | 80.7% | 29.4% |
| 1968 | 80.3% | 27.8% |
| 1967 | 79.9% | 26.3% |
| 1966 | 79.4% | 24.8% |
| 1965 | 78.9% | 23.4% |
| 1964 | 78.3% | 22% |
| 1963 | 77.7% | 20.7% |
| 1962 | 77.1% | 19.8% |
| 1961 | 76.5% | 19% |
| 1960 | 76% | 18.1% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 86.3% to 87.1% in New Zealand and from 36.4% to 46.9% in Zambia.
Densely populated cities
|
New Zealand
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Auckland | 1.47M |
| Christchurch | 383K |
| Wellington | 216K |
| Hamilton | 176K |
| Tauranga | 151K |
| Dunedin | 106K |
| Lower Hutt | 103K |
| Palmerston North | 81.5K |
| Napier | 66.3K |
| Porirua | 59.6K |
|
Zambia
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Lusaka | 2.47M |
| Kitwe | 625K |
| Ndola | 528K |
| Chingola | 255K |
| Mufulira | 182K |
| Livingstone | 177K |
| Kasama | 158K |
| Kapiri Mposhi | 65.2K |
| Choma | 51.8K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
