The Philippines has a population density of 1,006 people per square mile compared to 74.3 people in Zambia. The Philippines has 31,912 sq ft of land per person vs 380,067 sq ft in Zambia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, the Philippines and Zambia are ranked 24th and 158th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. The Philippines has 1.42% of the world's population and 0.2% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.26% of the population and 0.5% of the land area for Zambia, hence the population density in the Philippines is 1,255% higher than in Zambia.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 1,006 ppl/mi² | 74.3 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 24/197 | 158/197 |
| Population |
117540050
|
22402291
|
| Land area | 115,124 sq mi | 287,024 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 27,705 sq ft | 375,407 sq ft |
| Rural population | 51.4% | 53.1% |
| Urban population | 48.6% | 46.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 7.12% | 11.6% |
the Philippines vs Zambia:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in the Philippines increased by 34.1%, compared to a 88% growth in Zambia.
In 2004, the Philippines ranked 28th for population density and is in 24th place now. Zambia was 163rd in 2004 and ranks 158th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 1,006 | 74.3 |
| 2023 | 998 | 72.2 |
| 2022 | 990 | 70.2 |
| 2021 | 982 | 68.3 |
| 2020 | 974 | 66.4 |
| 2019 | 962 | 64.5 |
| 2018 | 951 | 62.6 |
| 2017 | 939 | 60.8 |
| 2016 | 927 | 58.9 |
| 2015 | 915 | 57.1 |
| 2014 | 901 | 55.4 |
| 2013 | 887 | 53.7 |
| 2012 | 870 | 52 |
| 2011 | 853 | 50.3 |
| 2010 | 837 | 48.7 |
| 2009 | 820 | 47 |
| 2008 | 805 | 45.4 |
| 2007 | 791 | 43.8 |
| 2006 | 778 | 42.3 |
| 2005 | 765 | 40.8 |
| 2004 | 750 | 39.5 |
| 2003 | 736 | 38.3 |
| 2002 | 722 | 37.1 |
| 2001 | 707 | 36 |
| 2000 | 692 | 34.9 |
| 1999 | 675 | 33.9 |
| 1998 | 658 | 33 |
| 1997 | 642 | 32.2 |
| 1996 | 627 | 31.4 |
| 1995 | 613 | 30.6 |
| 1994 | 600 | 29.9 |
| 1993 | 587 | 29.2 |
| 1992 | 573 | 28.5 |
| 1991 | 559 | 27.8 |
| 1990 | 546 | 27.1 |
| 1989 | 532 | 26.4 |
| 1988 | 519 | 25.8 |
| 1987 | 505 | 25.1 |
| 1986 | 492 | 24.3 |
| 1985 | 480 | 23.6 |
| 1984 | 467 | 22.9 |
| 1983 | 453 | 22.2 |
| 1982 | 440 | 21.5 |
| 1981 | 428 | 20.8 |
| 1980 | 417 | 20.2 |
| 1979 | 407 | 19.6 |
| 1978 | 396 | 19 |
| 1977 | 385 | 18.5 |
| 1976 | 375 | 17.9 |
| 1975 | 366 | 17.4 |
| 1974 | 358 | 16.9 |
| 1973 | 350 | 16.4 |
| 1972 | 342 | 15.9 |
| 1971 | 334 | 15.5 |
| 1970 | 327 | 15.1 |
| 1969 | 318 | 14.6 |
| 1968 | 309 | 14.2 |
| 1967 | 301 | 13.7 |
| 1966 | 291.9 | 13.3 |
| 1965 | 283.3 | 12.9 |
| 1964 | 274.8 | 12.5 |
| 1963 | 266.4 | 12.1 |
| 1962 | 258.1 | 11.7 |
| 1961 | 250 | 11.3 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 48.6% | 46.9% |
| 2023 | 48.3% | 46.3% |
| 2022 | 48% | 45.8% |
| 2021 | 47.7% | 45.2% |
| 2020 | 47.4% | 44.6% |
| 2019 | 47.1% | 44.1% |
| 2018 | 46.9% | 43.5% |
| 2017 | 46.7% | 43% |
| 2016 | 46.5% | 42.4% |
| 2015 | 46.3% | 41.9% |
| 2014 | 46.1% | 41.4% |
| 2013 | 45.9% | 40.9% |
| 2012 | 45.7% | 40.4% |
| 2011 | 45.5% | 39.9% |
| 2010 | 45.3% | 39.4% |
| 2009 | 45.4% | 38.9% |
| 2008 | 45.5% | 38.4% |
| 2007 | 45.5% | 37.9% |
| 2006 | 45.6% | 37.4% |
| 2005 | 45.7% | 36.9% |
| 2004 | 45.8% | 36.4% |
| 2003 | 45.9% | 36% |
| 2002 | 46% | 35.5% |
| 2001 | 46% | 35% |
| 2000 | 46.1% | 34.8% |
| 1999 | 46.2% | 35.3% |
| 1998 | 46.3% | 35.7% |
| 1997 | 46.4% | 36.2% |
| 1996 | 46.5% | 36.6% |
| 1995 | 46.6% | 37.1% |
| 1994 | 46.6% | 37.6% |
| 1993 | 46.7% | 38% |
| 1992 | 46.8% | 38.5% |
| 1991 | 46.9% | 39% |
| 1990 | 47% | 39.4% |
| 1989 | 46.2% | 39.5% |
| 1988 | 45.2% | 39.5% |
| 1987 | 44.2% | 39.6% |
| 1986 | 43.2% | 39.6% |
| 1985 | 42.2% | 39.7% |
| 1984 | 41.3% | 39.7% |
| 1983 | 40.3% | 39.8% |
| 1982 | 39.3% | 39.8% |
| 1981 | 38.4% | 39.9% |
| 1980 | 37.5% | 39.8% |
| 1979 | 37% | 38.8% |
| 1978 | 36.6% | 37.8% |
| 1977 | 36.3% | 36.9% |
| 1976 | 35.9% | 35.9% |
| 1975 | 35.6% | 34.9% |
| 1974 | 35.1% | 34% |
| 1973 | 34.5% | 33.1% |
| 1972 | 34% | 32.1% |
| 1971 | 33.5% | 31.2% |
| 1970 | 33% | 30.4% |
| 1969 | 32.7% | 29.4% |
| 1968 | 32.4% | 27.8% |
| 1967 | 32.1% | 26.3% |
| 1966 | 31.9% | 24.8% |
| 1965 | 31.6% | 23.4% |
| 1964 | 31.3% | 22% |
| 1963 | 31.1% | 20.7% |
| 1962 | 30.8% | 19.8% |
| 1961 | 30.6% | 19% |
| 1960 | 30.3% | 18.1% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 45.8% to 48.6% in the Philippines and from 36.4% to 46.9% in Zambia.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Quezon | 2.96M |
| Manila | 1.85M |
| Davao | 1.78M |
| Caloocan | 1.66M |
| Zamboanga | 977K |
| Cebu | 964K |
| Palawan | 940K |
| Antipolo | 887K |
| Taguig | 887K |
| La Union | 822K |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Lusaka | 2.47M |
| Kitwe | 625K |
| Ndola | 528K |
| Chingola | 255K |
| Mufulira | 182K |
| Livingstone | 177K |
| Kasama | 158K |
| Kapiri Mposhi | 65.2K |
| Choma | 51.8K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons