Nauru has a population density of 1,547 people per square mile compared to 74.3 people in Zambia. Nauru has 18,920 sq ft of land per person vs 380,067 sq ft in Zambia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Nauru and Zambia are ranked 12th and 158th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Nauru has 0.0001% of the world's population and 0.00001% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.26% of the population and 0.5% of the land area for Zambia, hence the population density in Nauru is 1,983% higher than in Zambia.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 1,547 ppl/mi² | 74.3 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 12/197 | 158/197 |
| Population |
12088
|
22402291
|
| Land area | 7.72 sq mi | 287,024 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 18,019 sq ft | 375,407 sq ft |
| Rural population | 0% | 53.1% |
| Urban population | 100% | 46.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 11.6% |
Nauru vs Zambia:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Nauru increased by 18.8%, compared to a 88% growth in Zambia.
In 2004, Nauru ranked 12th for population density and is in 12th place still. Zambia was 163rd in 2004 and ranks 158th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 1,547 | 74.3 |
| 2023 | 1,538 | 72.2 |
| 2022 | 1,528 | 70.2 |
| 2021 | 1,516 | 68.3 |
| 2020 | 1,508 | 66.4 |
| 2019 | 1,501 | 64.5 |
| 2018 | 1,486 | 62.6 |
| 2017 | 1,466 | 60.8 |
| 2016 | 1,444 | 58.9 |
| 2015 | 1,419 | 57.1 |
| 2014 | 1,391 | 55.4 |
| 2013 | 1,362 | 53.7 |
| 2012 | 1,330 | 52 |
| 2011 | 1,308 | 50.3 |
| 2010 | 1,301 | 48.7 |
| 2009 | 1,297 | 47 |
| 2008 | 1,296 | 45.4 |
| 2007 | 1,298 | 43.8 |
| 2006 | 1,299 | 42.3 |
| 2005 | 1,301 | 40.8 |
| 2004 | 1,303 | 39.5 |
| 2003 | 1,303 | 38.3 |
| 2002 | 1,306 | 37.1 |
| 2001 | 1,312 | 36 |
| 2000 | 1,317 | 34.9 |
| 1999 | 1,319 | 33.9 |
| 1998 | 1,321 | 33 |
| 1997 | 1,321 | 32.2 |
| 1996 | 1,319 | 31.4 |
| 1995 | 1,316 | 30.6 |
| 1994 | 1,313 | 29.9 |
| 1993 | 1,308 | 29.2 |
| 1992 | 1,298 | 28.5 |
| 1991 | 1,276 | 27.8 |
| 1990 | 1,246 | 27.1 |
| 1989 | 1,216 | 26.4 |
| 1988 | 1,187 | 25.8 |
| 1987 | 1,159 | 25.1 |
| 1986 | 1,132 | 24.3 |
| 1985 | 1,107 | 23.6 |
| 1984 | 1,085 | 22.9 |
| 1983 | 1,064 | 22.2 |
| 1982 | 1,041 | 21.5 |
| 1981 | 1,015 | 20.8 |
| 1980 | 991 | 20.2 |
| 1979 | 967 | 19.6 |
| 1978 | 945 | 19 |
| 1977 | 928 | 18.5 |
| 1976 | 915 | 17.9 |
| 1975 | 905 | 17.4 |
| 1974 | 897 | 16.9 |
| 1973 | 889 | 16.4 |
| 1972 | 882 | 15.9 |
| 1971 | 876 | 15.5 |
| 1970 | 869 | 15.1 |
| 1969 | 852 | 14.6 |
| 1968 | 819 | 14.2 |
| 1967 | 794 | 13.7 |
| 1966 | 783 | 13.3 |
| 1965 | 755 | 12.9 |
| 1964 | 714 | 12.5 |
| 1963 | 677 | 12.1 |
| 1962 | 645 | 11.7 |
| 1961 | 618 | 11.3 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 100% | 46.9% |
| 2023 | 100% | 46.3% |
| 2022 | 100% | 45.8% |
| 2021 | 100% | 45.2% |
| 2020 | 100% | 44.6% |
| 2019 | 100% | 44.1% |
| 2018 | 100% | 43.5% |
| 2017 | 100% | 43% |
| 2016 | 100% | 42.4% |
| 2015 | 100% | 41.9% |
| 2014 | 100% | 41.4% |
| 2013 | 100% | 40.9% |
| 2012 | 100% | 40.4% |
| 2011 | 100% | 39.9% |
| 2010 | 100% | 39.4% |
| 2009 | 100% | 38.9% |
| 2008 | 100% | 38.4% |
| 2007 | 100% | 37.9% |
| 2006 | 100% | 37.4% |
| 2005 | 100% | 36.9% |
| 2004 | 100% | 36.4% |
| 2003 | 100% | 36% |
| 2002 | 100% | 35.5% |
| 2001 | 100% | 35% |
| 2000 | 100% | 34.8% |
| 1999 | 100% | 35.3% |
| 1998 | 100% | 35.7% |
| 1997 | 100% | 36.2% |
| 1996 | 100% | 36.6% |
| 1995 | 100% | 37.1% |
| 1994 | 100% | 37.6% |
| 1993 | 100% | 38% |
| 1992 | 100% | 38.5% |
| 1991 | 100% | 39% |
| 1990 | 100% | 39.4% |
| 1989 | 100% | 39.5% |
| 1988 | 100% | 39.5% |
| 1987 | 100% | 39.6% |
| 1986 | 100% | 39.6% |
| 1985 | 100% | 39.7% |
| 1984 | 100% | 39.7% |
| 1983 | 100% | 39.8% |
| 1982 | 100% | 39.8% |
| 1981 | 100% | 39.9% |
| 1980 | 100% | 39.8% |
| 1979 | 100% | 38.8% |
| 1978 | 100% | 37.8% |
| 1977 | 100% | 36.9% |
| 1976 | 100% | 35.9% |
| 1975 | 100% | 34.9% |
| 1974 | 100% | 34% |
| 1973 | 100% | 33.1% |
| 1972 | 100% | 32.1% |
| 1971 | 100% | 31.2% |
| 1970 | 100% | 30.4% |
| 1969 | 100% | 29.4% |
| 1968 | 100% | 27.8% |
| 1967 | 100% | 26.3% |
| 1966 | 100% | 24.8% |
| 1965 | 100% | 23.4% |
| 1964 | 100% | 22% |
| 1963 | 100% | 20.7% |
| 1962 | 100% | 19.8% |
| 1961 | 100% | 19% |
| 1960 | 100% | 18.1% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 100% to 100% in Nauru and from 36.4% to 46.9% in Zambia.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Lusaka | 2.47M |
| Kitwe | 625K |
| Ndola | 528K |
| Chingola | 255K |
| Mufulira | 182K |
| Livingstone | 177K |
| Kasama | 158K |
| Kapiri Mposhi | 65.2K |
| Choma | 51.8K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons