Portugal has a population density of 303 people per square mile compared to 74.3 people in Zambia. Portugal has 92,762 sq ft of land per person vs 380,067 sq ft in Zambia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Portugal and Zambia are ranked 81st and 158th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Portugal has 0.13% of the world's population and 0.06% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.26% of the population and 0.5% of the land area for Zambia, hence the population density in Portugal is 307% higher than in Zambia.
Population density comparison
Portugal
|
Zambia
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 303 ppl/mi² | 74.3 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 81/197 | 158/197 |
| Population |
10687819
|
22402291
|
| Land area | 35,369 sq mi | 287,024 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 92,139 sq ft | 375,407 sq ft |
| Rural population | 31.6% | 53.1% |
| Urban population | 68.4% | 46.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 11.6% |
Portugal vs Zambia:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Portugal increased by 1.96%, compared to a 88% growth in Zambia.
In 2004, Portugal ranked 68th for population density and is in 81st place now. Zambia was 163rd in 2004 and ranks 158th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Portugal
|
Zambia
|
|
| 2024 | 303 | 74.3 |
| 2023 | 299.1 | 72.2 |
| 2022 | 295 | 70.2 |
| 2021 | 293 | 68.3 |
| 2020 | 291.1 | 66.4 |
| 2019 | 290.8 | 64.5 |
| 2018 | 290.8 | 62.6 |
| 2017 | 291.2 | 60.8 |
| 2016 | 291.9 | 58.9 |
| 2015 | 292.9 | 57.1 |
| 2014 | 294.1 | 55.4 |
| 2013 | 295.7 | 53.7 |
| 2012 | 297.3 | 52 |
| 2011 | 298.5 | 50.3 |
| 2010 | 299 | 48.7 |
| 2009 | 298.8 | 47 |
| 2008 | 299 | 45.4 |
| 2007 | 298.5 | 43.8 |
| 2006 | 297.9 | 42.3 |
| 2005 | 297.4 | 40.8 |
| 2004 | 296.8 | 39.5 |
| 2003 | 296 | 38.3 |
| 2002 | 294.9 | 37.1 |
| 2001 | 293.3 | 36 |
| 2000 | 291.3 | 34.9 |
| 1999 | 289.2 | 33.9 |
| 1998 | 287.6 | 33 |
| 1997 | 286.1 | 32.2 |
| 1996 | 284.9 | 31.4 |
| 1995 | 283.8 | 30.6 |
| 1994 | 282.8 | 29.9 |
| 1993 | 282.1 | 29.2 |
| 1992 | 281.7 | 28.5 |
| 1991 | 281.9 | 27.8 |
| 1990 | 282.6 | 27.1 |
| 1989 | 283.2 | 26.4 |
| 1988 | 283.6 | 25.8 |
| 1987 | 283.9 | 25.1 |
| 1986 | 284 | 24.3 |
| 1985 | 283.7 | 23.6 |
| 1984 | 283 | 22.9 |
| 1983 | 281.9 | 22.2 |
| 1982 | 280.6 | 21.5 |
| 1981 | 278.9 | 20.8 |
| 1980 | 276.4 | 20.2 |
| 1979 | 273.5 | 19.6 |
| 1978 | 270.6 | 19 |
| 1977 | 267.7 | 18.5 |
| 1976 | 264.8 | 17.9 |
| 1975 | 257.4 | 17.4 |
| 1974 | 247.8 | 16.9 |
| 1973 | 244.4 | 16.4 |
| 1972 | 244.3 | 15.9 |
| 1971 | 244.7 | 15.5 |
| 1970 | 245.7 | 15.1 |
| 1969 | 247.9 | 14.6 |
| 1968 | 250.1 | 14.2 |
| 1967 | 251.2 | 13.7 |
| 1966 | 252.8 | 13.3 |
| 1965 | 254.7 | 12.9 |
| 1964 | 255.8 | 12.5 |
| 1963 | 255.6 | 12.1 |
| 1962 | 254.6 | 11.7 |
| 1961 | 252.8 | 11.3 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Portugal
|
Zambia
|
|
| 2024 | 68.4% | 46.9% |
| 2023 | 67.9% | 46.3% |
| 2022 | 67.4% | 45.8% |
| 2021 | 66.8% | 45.2% |
| 2020 | 66.3% | 44.6% |
| 2019 | 65.8% | 44.1% |
| 2018 | 65.2% | 43.5% |
| 2017 | 64.7% | 43% |
| 2016 | 64.1% | 42.4% |
| 2015 | 63.5% | 41.9% |
| 2014 | 62.9% | 41.4% |
| 2013 | 62.4% | 40.9% |
| 2012 | 61.8% | 40.4% |
| 2011 | 61.2% | 39.9% |
| 2010 | 60.6% | 39.4% |
| 2009 | 60% | 38.9% |
| 2008 | 59.4% | 38.4% |
| 2007 | 58.7% | 37.9% |
| 2006 | 58.1% | 37.4% |
| 2005 | 57.5% | 36.9% |
| 2004 | 56.9% | 36.4% |
| 2003 | 56.3% | 36% |
| 2002 | 55.7% | 35.5% |
| 2001 | 55% | 35% |
| 2000 | 54.4% | 34.8% |
| 1999 | 53.7% | 35.3% |
| 1998 | 53.1% | 35.7% |
| 1997 | 52.4% | 36.2% |
| 1996 | 51.8% | 36.6% |
| 1995 | 51.1% | 37.1% |
| 1994 | 50.4% | 37.6% |
| 1993 | 49.8% | 38% |
| 1992 | 49.1% | 38.5% |
| 1991 | 48.5% | 39% |
| 1990 | 47.9% | 39.4% |
| 1989 | 47.4% | 39.5% |
| 1988 | 46.9% | 39.5% |
| 1987 | 46.3% | 39.6% |
| 1986 | 45.8% | 39.6% |
| 1985 | 45.3% | 39.7% |
| 1984 | 44.8% | 39.7% |
| 1983 | 44.3% | 39.8% |
| 1982 | 43.7% | 39.8% |
| 1981 | 43.2% | 39.9% |
| 1980 | 42.8% | 39.8% |
| 1979 | 42.4% | 38.8% |
| 1978 | 42% | 37.8% |
| 1977 | 41.6% | 36.9% |
| 1976 | 41.2% | 35.9% |
| 1975 | 40.8% | 34.9% |
| 1974 | 40.4% | 34% |
| 1973 | 40% | 33.1% |
| 1972 | 39.6% | 32.1% |
| 1971 | 39.2% | 31.2% |
| 1970 | 38.8% | 30.4% |
| 1969 | 38.4% | 29.4% |
| 1968 | 38% | 27.8% |
| 1967 | 37.6% | 26.3% |
| 1966 | 37.3% | 24.8% |
| 1965 | 36.9% | 23.4% |
| 1964 | 36.5% | 22% |
| 1963 | 36.1% | 20.7% |
| 1962 | 35.7% | 19.8% |
| 1961 | 35.3% | 19% |
| 1960 | 35% | 18.1% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 56.9% to 68.4% in Portugal and from 36.4% to 46.9% in Zambia.
Densely populated cities
|
Portugal
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Lisbon | 546K |
| Sintra | 386K |
| Vila Nova de Gaia | 304K |
| Cascais | 214K |
| Loures | 202K |
| Braga | 193K |
| Oeiras | 172K |
| Amadora | 171K |
| Seixal | 167K |
| Odivelas | 148K |
|
Zambia
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Lusaka | 2.47M |
| Kitwe | 625K |
| Ndola | 528K |
| Chingola | 255K |
| Mufulira | 182K |
| Livingstone | 177K |
| Kasama | 158K |
| Kapiri Mposhi | 65.2K |
| Choma | 51.8K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
