Curacao has a population density of 909 people per square mile compared to 39.6 people in Norway. Curacao has 30,655 sq ft of land per person vs 744,101 sq ft in Norway. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Curacao and Norway are ranked 26th and 182nd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Curacao has 0.002% of the world's population and 0.0003% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.07% of the population and 0.24% of the land area for Norway, hence the population density in Curacao is 2,195% higher than in Norway.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 909 ppl/mi² | 39.6 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 26/197 | 182/197 |
| Population |
155910
|
5642662
|
| Land area | 171.4 sq mi | 140,645 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 30,655 sq ft | 703,657 sq ft |
| Rural population | 11% | 15.7% |
| Urban population | 89% | 84.3% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Curacao vs Norway:
Population density chart by year
From 2011 to 2024, population density in Curacao increased by 3.36%, compared to a 12.8% growth in Norway.
In 2011, Curacao ranked 26th for population density and is in 26th place still. Norway was 173rd in 2011 and ranks 182nd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 909 | 39.6 |
| 2023 | 909 | 39.2 |
| 2022 | 875 | 38.8 |
| 2021 | 889 | 38.5 |
| 2020 | 904 | 38.2 |
| 2019 | 918 | 37.9 |
| 2018 | 929 | 37.7 |
| 2017 | 934 | 37.4 |
| 2016 | 931 | 37.1 |
| 2015 | 922 | 36.8 |
| 2014 | 909 | 36.4 |
| 2013 | 897 | 36 |
| 2012 | 887 | 35.6 |
| 2011 | 880 | 35.1 |
| 2010 | - | 34.7 |
| 2009 | - | 34.2 |
| 2008 | - | 33.8 |
| 2007 | - | 33.4 |
| 2006 | - | 33 |
| 2005 | - | 32.8 |
| 2004 | - | 32.6 |
| 2003 | - | 32.4 |
| 2002 | - | 32.2 |
| 2001 | - | 32 |
| 2000 | - | 31.8 |
| 1999 | - | 31.6 |
| 1998 | - | 31.4 |
| 1997 | - | 31.2 |
| 1996 | - | 31.1 |
| 1995 | - | 30.9 |
| 1994 | - | 30.8 |
| 1993 | - | 30.6 |
| 1992 | - | 30.4 |
| 1991 | - | 30.2 |
| 1990 | - | 30.1 |
| 1989 | - | 30 |
| 1988 | - | 29.8 |
| 1987 | - | 29.7 |
| 1986 | - | 29.6 |
| 1985 | - | 29.4 |
| 1984 | - | 29.4 |
| 1983 | - | 29.3 |
| 1982 | - | 29.2 |
| 1981 | - | 29.1 |
| 1980 | - | 29 |
| 1979 | - | 28.9 |
| 1978 | - | 28.8 |
| 1977 | - | 28.7 |
| 1976 | - | 28.5 |
| 1975 | - | 28.4 |
| 1974 | - | 28.3 |
| 1973 | - | 28.1 |
| 1972 | - | 27.9 |
| 1971 | - | 27.7 |
| 1970 | - | 27.5 |
| 1969 | - | 27.3 |
| 1968 | - | 27.1 |
| 1967 | - | 26.8 |
| 1966 | - | 26.6 |
| 1965 | - | 26.4 |
| 1964 | - | 26.2 |
| 1963 | - | 26 |
| 1962 | - | 25.8 |
| 1961 | - | 25.6 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 89% | 84.3% |
| 2023 | 89% | 84% |
| 2022 | 89% | 83.7% |
| 2021 | 89% | 83.3% |
| 2020 | 89.1% | 83% |
| 2019 | 89.1% | 82.6% |
| 2018 | 89.1% | 82.2% |
| 2017 | 89.2% | 81.9% |
| 2016 | 89.3% | 81.5% |
| 2015 | 89.4% | 81.1% |
| 2014 | 89.4% | 80.7% |
| 2013 | 89.5% | 80.3% |
| 2012 | 89.7% | 79.9% |
| 2011 | 89.8% | 79.5% |
| 2010 | 89.9% | 79.1% |
| 2009 | 90% | 78.8% |
| 2008 | 90.2% | 78.5% |
| 2007 | 90.3% | 78.2% |
| 2006 | 90.4% | 78% |
| 2005 | 90.5% | 77.7% |
| 2004 | 90.7% | 77.4% |
| 2003 | 90.8% | 77.1% |
| 2002 | 90.9% | 76.7% |
| 2001 | 91% | 76.4% |
| 2000 | 90.8% | 76% |
| 1999 | 90.2% | 75.6% |
| 1998 | 89.6% | 75% |
| 1997 | 89% | 74.5% |
| 1996 | 88.4% | 74.1% |
| 1995 | 87.7% | 73.8% |
| 1994 | 87% | 73.5% |
| 1993 | 86.2% | 73.1% |
| 1992 | 85.4% | 72.7% |
| 1991 | 84.9% | 72.3% |
| 1990 | 84.7% | 72% |
| 1989 | 84.4% | 71.8% |
| 1988 | 84.1% | 71.7% |
| 1987 | 83.8% | 71.6% |
| 1986 | 83.6% | 71.4% |
| 1985 | 83.3% | 71.3% |
| 1984 | 83% | 71.2% |
| 1983 | 82.7% | 71% |
| 1982 | 82.4% | 70.9% |
| 1981 | 82.1% | 70.8% |
| 1980 | 81.8% | 70.5% |
| 1979 | 81.5% | 70.1% |
| 1978 | 81.1% | 69.6% |
| 1977 | 80.8% | 69.1% |
| 1976 | 80.5% | 68.7% |
| 1975 | 80.2% | 68.2% |
| 1974 | 79.8% | 67.7% |
| 1973 | 79.5% | 67.2% |
| 1972 | 79.1% | 66.7% |
| 1971 | 78.8% | 66.2% |
| 1970 | 78.4% | 65.4% |
| 1969 | 78.1% | 63.9% |
| 1968 | 77.7% | 62.3% |
| 1967 | 77.4% | 60.8% |
| 1966 | 77% | 59.2% |
| 1965 | 76.6% | 57.6% |
| 1964 | 76.3% | 55.9% |
| 1963 | 75.9% | 54.3% |
| 1962 | 75.5% | 52.7% |
| 1961 | 75.1% | 51% |
| 1960 | 74.7% | 49.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 90.7% to 89% in Curacao and from 77.4% to 84.3% in Norway.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons