Bolivia has a population density of 29.7 people per square mile compared to 909 people in Curacao. Bolivia has 952,608 sq ft of land per person vs 30,655 sq ft in Curacao. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Bolivia and Curacao are ranked 183rd and 26th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Bolivia has 0.15% of the world's population and 0.73% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.002% of the population and 0.0003% of the land area for Curacao, hence the population density in Bolivia is 96.7% lower than in Curacao.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 29.7 ppl/mi² | 909 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 183/197 | 26/197 |
| Population |
12716350
|
155910
|
| Land area | 418,264 sq mi | 171.4 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 939,358 sq ft | 30,655 sq ft |
| Rural population | 28.5% | 11% |
| Urban population | 71.5% | 89% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 25.4% | 0% |
Bolivia vs Curacao:
Population density chart by year
From 2011 to 2024, population density in Bolivia increased by 19.9%, compared to a 3.36% growth in Curacao.
In 2011, Bolivia ranked 181st for population density and is in 183rd place now. Curacao was 26th in 2011 and still ranks 26th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 29.7 | 909 |
| 2023 | 29.3 | 909 |
| 2022 | 28.9 | 875 |
| 2021 | 28.5 | 889 |
| 2020 | 28.3 | 904 |
| 2019 | 27.9 | 918 |
| 2018 | 27.5 | 929 |
| 2017 | 27.1 | 934 |
| 2016 | 26.7 | 931 |
| 2015 | 26.3 | 922 |
| 2014 | 25.9 | 909 |
| 2013 | 25.5 | 897 |
| 2012 | 25.1 | 887 |
| 2011 | 24.7 | 880 |
| 2010 | 24.3 | - |
| 2009 | 23.9 | - |
| 2008 | 23.6 | - |
| 2007 | 23.2 | - |
| 2006 | 22.8 | - |
| 2005 | 22.4 | - |
| 2004 | 22 | - |
| 2003 | 21.6 | - |
| 2002 | 21.3 | - |
| 2001 | 20.9 | - |
| 2000 | 20.6 | - |
| 1999 | 20.2 | - |
| 1998 | 19.9 | - |
| 1997 | 19.5 | - |
| 1996 | 19.2 | - |
| 1995 | 18.8 | - |
| 1994 | 18.5 | - |
| 1993 | 18.1 | - |
| 1992 | 17.8 | - |
| 1991 | 17.4 | - |
| 1990 | 17 | - |
| 1989 | 16.7 | - |
| 1988 | 16.3 | - |
| 1987 | 16 | - |
| 1986 | 15.7 | - |
| 1985 | 15.3 | - |
| 1984 | 15 | - |
| 1983 | 14.7 | - |
| 1982 | 14.4 | - |
| 1981 | 14.1 | - |
| 1980 | 13.8 | - |
| 1979 | 13.5 | - |
| 1978 | 13.2 | - |
| 1977 | 12.9 | - |
| 1976 | 12.6 | - |
| 1975 | 12.3 | - |
| 1974 | 12 | - |
| 1973 | 11.7 | - |
| 1972 | 11.5 | - |
| 1971 | 11.2 | - |
| 1970 | 11 | - |
| 1969 | 10.7 | - |
| 1968 | 10.5 | - |
| 1967 | 10.3 | - |
| 1966 | 10 | - |
| 1965 | 9.83 | - |
| 1964 | 9.62 | - |
| 1963 | 9.42 | - |
| 1962 | 9.22 | - |
| 1961 | 9.03 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 71.5% | 89% |
| 2023 | 71.2% | 89% |
| 2022 | 70.8% | 89% |
| 2021 | 70.5% | 89% |
| 2020 | 70.1% | 89.1% |
| 2019 | 69.8% | 89.1% |
| 2018 | 69.4% | 89.1% |
| 2017 | 69.1% | 89.2% |
| 2016 | 68.7% | 89.3% |
| 2015 | 68.4% | 89.4% |
| 2014 | 68% | 89.4% |
| 2013 | 67.7% | 89.5% |
| 2012 | 67.3% | 89.7% |
| 2011 | 66.9% | 89.8% |
| 2010 | 66.4% | 89.9% |
| 2009 | 66% | 90% |
| 2008 | 65.5% | 90.2% |
| 2007 | 65.1% | 90.3% |
| 2006 | 64.6% | 90.4% |
| 2005 | 64.2% | 90.5% |
| 2004 | 63.7% | 90.7% |
| 2003 | 63.2% | 90.8% |
| 2002 | 62.8% | 90.9% |
| 2001 | 62.3% | 91% |
| 2000 | 61.8% | 90.8% |
| 1999 | 61.3% | 90.2% |
| 1998 | 60.7% | 89.6% |
| 1997 | 60.2% | 89% |
| 1996 | 59.7% | 88.4% |
| 1995 | 59.2% | 87.7% |
| 1994 | 58.6% | 87% |
| 1993 | 58.1% | 86.2% |
| 1992 | 57.5% | 85.4% |
| 1991 | 56.6% | 84.9% |
| 1990 | 55.6% | 84.7% |
| 1989 | 54.6% | 84.4% |
| 1988 | 53.6% | 84.1% |
| 1987 | 52.5% | 83.8% |
| 1986 | 51.5% | 83.6% |
| 1985 | 50.5% | 83.3% |
| 1984 | 49.5% | 83% |
| 1983 | 48.5% | 82.7% |
| 1982 | 47.5% | 82.4% |
| 1981 | 46.5% | 82.1% |
| 1980 | 45.5% | 81.8% |
| 1979 | 44.4% | 81.5% |
| 1978 | 43.4% | 81.1% |
| 1977 | 42.4% | 80.8% |
| 1976 | 41.6% | 80.5% |
| 1975 | 41.3% | 80.2% |
| 1974 | 41% | 79.8% |
| 1973 | 40.7% | 79.5% |
| 1972 | 40.4% | 79.1% |
| 1971 | 40.1% | 78.8% |
| 1970 | 39.8% | 78.4% |
| 1969 | 39.5% | 78.1% |
| 1968 | 39.2% | 77.7% |
| 1967 | 38.9% | 77.4% |
| 1966 | 38.6% | 77% |
| 1965 | 38.3% | 76.6% |
| 1964 | 38% | 76.3% |
| 1963 | 37.7% | 75.9% |
| 1962 | 37.4% | 75.5% |
| 1961 | 37.1% | 75.1% |
| 1960 | 36.8% | 74.7% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 63.7% to 71.5% in Bolivia and from 90.7% to 89% in Curacao.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons