Curacao has a population density of 909 people per square mile compared to 250.6 people in Honduras. Curacao has 30,655 sq ft of land per person vs 111,850 sq ft in Honduras. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Curacao and Honduras are ranked 26th and 97th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Curacao has 0.002% of the world's population and 0.0003% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.13% of the population and 0.08% of the land area for Honduras, hence the population density in Curacao is 262.9% higher than in Honduras.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 909 ppl/mi² | 250.6 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 26/197 | 97/197 |
| Population |
155910
|
11149564
|
| Land area | 171.4 sq mi | 43,201 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 30,655 sq ft | 111,251 sq ft |
| Rural population | 11% | 39.2% |
| Urban population | 89% | 60.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 9.75% |
Curacao vs Honduras:
Population density chart by year
From 2011 to 2024, population density in Curacao increased by 3.36%, compared to a 26.8% growth in Honduras.
In 2011, Curacao ranked 26th for population density and is in 26th place still. Honduras was 102nd in 2011 and ranks 97th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 909 | 250.6 |
| 2023 | 909 | 246.4 |
| 2022 | 875 | 242.2 |
| 2021 | 889 | 238.2 |
| 2020 | 904 | 234.2 |
| 2019 | 918 | 230.2 |
| 2018 | 929 | 226 |
| 2017 | 934 | 221.9 |
| 2016 | 931 | 217.9 |
| 2015 | 922 | 213.8 |
| 2014 | 909 | 209.8 |
| 2013 | 897 | 205.8 |
| 2012 | 887 | 201.7 |
| 2011 | 880 | 197.7 |
| 2010 | - | 193.7 |
| 2009 | - | 189.6 |
| 2008 | - | 185.5 |
| 2007 | - | 181.4 |
| 2006 | - | 177.2 |
| 2005 | - | 173.1 |
| 2004 | - | 169 |
| 2003 | - | 164.8 |
| 2002 | - | 160.6 |
| 2001 | - | 156.4 |
| 2000 | - | 152.3 |
| 1999 | - | 148.2 |
| 1998 | - | 144.3 |
| 1997 | - | 140.5 |
| 1996 | - | 136.7 |
| 1995 | - | 132.9 |
| 1994 | - | 129.1 |
| 1993 | - | 125.5 |
| 1992 | - | 122 |
| 1991 | - | 118.6 |
| 1990 | - | 115.3 |
| 1989 | - | 112.1 |
| 1988 | - | 109 |
| 1987 | - | 105.9 |
| 1986 | - | 103 |
| 1985 | - | 100.1 |
| 1984 | - | 97.2 |
| 1983 | - | 94.4 |
| 1982 | - | 91.6 |
| 1981 | - | 88.9 |
| 1980 | - | 86.3 |
| 1979 | - | 83.7 |
| 1978 | - | 81.1 |
| 1977 | - | 78.7 |
| 1976 | - | 76.3 |
| 1975 | - | 73.9 |
| 1974 | - | 71.8 |
| 1973 | - | 69.7 |
| 1972 | - | 67.6 |
| 1971 | - | 65.6 |
| 1970 | - | 63.7 |
| 1969 | - | 61.8 |
| 1968 | - | 60 |
| 1967 | - | 58.3 |
| 1966 | - | 56.6 |
| 1965 | - | 55 |
| 1964 | - | 53.5 |
| 1963 | - | 52 |
| 1962 | - | 50.5 |
| 1961 | - | 49.1 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 89% | 60.8% |
| 2023 | 89% | 60.2% |
| 2022 | 89% | 59.6% |
| 2021 | 89% | 59% |
| 2020 | 89.1% | 58.4% |
| 2019 | 89.1% | 57.7% |
| 2018 | 89.1% | 57.1% |
| 2017 | 89.2% | 56.5% |
| 2016 | 89.3% | 55.8% |
| 2015 | 89.4% | 55.2% |
| 2014 | 89.4% | 54.5% |
| 2013 | 89.5% | 53.9% |
| 2012 | 89.7% | 53.2% |
| 2011 | 89.8% | 52.5% |
| 2010 | 89.9% | 51.9% |
| 2009 | 90% | 51.2% |
| 2008 | 90.2% | 50.6% |
| 2007 | 90.3% | 49.9% |
| 2006 | 90.4% | 49.2% |
| 2005 | 90.5% | 48.6% |
| 2004 | 90.7% | 47.9% |
| 2003 | 90.8% | 47.3% |
| 2002 | 90.9% | 46.6% |
| 2001 | 91% | 46% |
| 2000 | 90.8% | 45.5% |
| 1999 | 90.2% | 45% |
| 1998 | 89.6% | 44.4% |
| 1997 | 89% | 43.9% |
| 1996 | 88.4% | 43.4% |
| 1995 | 87.7% | 42.9% |
| 1994 | 87% | 42.4% |
| 1993 | 86.2% | 41.9% |
| 1992 | 85.4% | 41.4% |
| 1991 | 84.9% | 41% |
| 1990 | 84.7% | 40.5% |
| 1989 | 84.4% | 40% |
| 1988 | 84.1% | 39.5% |
| 1987 | 83.8% | 38.9% |
| 1986 | 83.6% | 38.3% |
| 1985 | 83.3% | 37.7% |
| 1984 | 83% | 37.2% |
| 1983 | 82.7% | 36.6% |
| 1982 | 82.4% | 36% |
| 1981 | 82.1% | 35.4% |
| 1980 | 81.8% | 34.9% |
| 1979 | 81.5% | 34.3% |
| 1978 | 81.1% | 33.8% |
| 1977 | 80.8% | 33.2% |
| 1976 | 80.5% | 32.7% |
| 1975 | 80.2% | 32.1% |
| 1974 | 79.8% | 31.6% |
| 1973 | 79.5% | 30.9% |
| 1972 | 79.1% | 30.2% |
| 1971 | 78.8% | 29.6% |
| 1970 | 78.4% | 28.9% |
| 1969 | 78.1% | 28.2% |
| 1968 | 77.7% | 27.6% |
| 1967 | 77.4% | 27% |
| 1966 | 77% | 26.3% |
| 1965 | 76.6% | 25.7% |
| 1964 | 76.3% | 25.1% |
| 1963 | 75.9% | 24.5% |
| 1962 | 75.5% | 23.9% |
| 1961 | 75.1% | 23.3% |
| 1960 | 74.7% | 22.7% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 90.7% to 89% in Curacao and from 47.9% to 60.8% in Honduras.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Tegucigalpa | 1.06M |
| San Pedro Sula | 719K |
| Choloma | 232K |
| La Ceiba | 197K |
| El Progreso | 188K |
| Villanueva | 150K |
| Comayagua | 145K |
| Puerto Cortes | 122K |
| Yoro | 86.7K |
| La Lima | 71.9K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons