The latest officially reported population of Ireland was 5,380,257 in 2024 vs 7,769,819 people in Laos in 2024. In 2025, based on the adjusted UN estimation, the current Ireland's population is 5,474,763 people compared to 7,954,155 in Laos.
Population statistics:
- Laos' population is 1.45 times bigger than Ireland's.
- Ireland is ranked the 121st most populous country in the world, while Laos is the 103rd.
- The countries together account for 0.16% of the world: 0.07% for Ireland vs 0.1% for Laos.
- For the last 10 years, Ireland has had an average growth rate of +1.39% per year vs +1.48% in Laos.
- Since 2005, the population of Ireland has increased from 4.16M people to 5.47M (31.6% growth), while Laos has grown from 5.87M to 7.95M (35.5% growth).
- Ireland is projected to reach its peak in 2053 at 6.12M people compared to the peak of 10.2M people in 2068 for Laos.
Ireland vs Laos: live population counter
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Current population |
5474763
|
7954155
|
| Population rank | 121/197 | 103/197 |
| Percent of world population | 0.07% | 0.1% |
| One net population change |
7.23 minutes
|
5.01 minutes
|
| One birth every |
9.61 minutes
|
3.22 minutes
|
| One death every |
15 minutes
|
11 minutes
|
| One migration net change every |
13.5 minutes
|
51.1 minutes
|
| Annual migration change | +39,059 | -10,284 |
| Daily growth/decline | +199 | +287 |
| Annual growth/decline | +72,657 | +104,826 |
| Annual growth/decline rate | +1.37% | +1.37% |
| Population growth rate rank | 78/197 | 80/197 |
Ireland and Laos: population history and growth rate by year chart
| Year | Population | Growth rate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1960 | 2,828,600 | 2,121,514 | - | - |
| 1961 | 2,824,400 | 2,169,796 | -0.15% | 2.28% |
| 1962 | 2,836,050 | 2,219,910 | 0.41% | 2.31% |
| 1963 | 2,852,650 | 2,271,061 | 0.59% | 2.3% |
| 1964 | 2,866,550 | 2,322,826 | 0.49% | 2.28% |
| 1965 | 2,877,300 | 2,376,200 | 0.38% | 2.3% |
| 1966 | 2,888,800 | 2,431,084 | 0.4% | 2.31% |
| 1967 | 2,902,450 | 2,487,715 | 0.47% | 2.33% |
| 1968 | 2,915,550 | 2,546,377 | 0.45% | 2.36% |
| 1969 | 2,932,650 | 2,606,959 | 0.59% | 2.38% |
| 1970 | 2,957,250 | 2,669,702 | 0.84% | 2.41% |
| 1971 | 2,992,050 | 2,734,628 | 1.18% | 2.43% |
| 1972 | 3,036,850 | 2,801,660 | 1.5% | 2.45% |
| 1973 | 3,085,950 | 2,870,573 | 1.62% | 2.46% |
| 1974 | 3,137,500 | 2,939,761 | 1.67% | 2.41% |
| 1975 | 3,189,550 | 3,005,521 | 1.66% | 2.24% |
| 1976 | 3,238,050 | 3,064,876 | 1.52% | 1.97% |
| 1977 | 3,282,200 | 3,118,923 | 1.36% | 1.76% |
| 1978 | 3,329,100 | 3,171,740 | 1.43% | 1.69% |
| 1979 | 3,373,750 | 3,228,202 | 1.34% | 1.78% |
| 1980 | 3,412,800 | 3,292,573 | 1.16% | 1.99% |
| 1981 | 3,453,000 | 3,366,631 | 1.18% | 2.25% |
| 1982 | 3,485,800 | 3,450,026 | 0.95% | 2.48% |
| 1983 | 3,510,600 | 3,541,001 | 0.71% | 2.64% |
| 1984 | 3,532,423 | 3,637,843 | 0.62% | 2.73% |
| 1985 | 3,538,082 | 3,739,985 | 0.16% | 2.81% |
| 1986 | 3,539,690 | 3,846,715 | 0.05% | 2.85% |
| 1987 | 3,540,057 | 3,957,612 | 0.01% | 2.88% |
| 1988 | 3,524,949 | 4,072,601 | -0.43% | 2.91% |
| 1989 | 3,511,009 | 4,190,974 | -0.4% | 2.91% |
| 1990 | 3,513,974 | 4,311,955 | 0.08% | 2.89% |
| 1991 | 3,534,235 | 4,435,118 | 0.58% | 2.86% |
| 1992 | 3,558,430 | 4,559,646 | 0.68% | 2.81% |
| 1993 | 3,576,261 | 4,685,060 | 0.5% | 2.75% |
| 1994 | 3,590,386 | 4,809,220 | 0.39% | 2.65% |
| 1995 | 3,608,841 | 4,929,409 | 0.51% | 2.5% |
| 1996 | 3,637,510 | 5,045,678 | 0.79% | 2.36% |
| 1997 | 3,674,171 | 5,152,011 | 1.01% | 2.11% |
| 1998 | 3,712,696 | 5,248,266 | 1.05% | 1.87% |
| 1999 | 3,754,786 | 5,340,784 | 1.13% | 1.76% |
| 2000 | 3,805,174 | 5,431,212 | 1.34% | 1.69% |
| 2001 | 3,866,243 | 5,521,482 | 1.6% | 1.66% |
| 2002 | 3,931,947 | 5,610,889 | 1.7% | 1.62% |
| 2003 | 3,996,521 | 5,697,945 | 1.64% | 1.55% |
| 2004 | 4,070,262 | 5,781,626 | 1.85% | 1.47% |
| 2005 | 4,159,914 | 5,869,523 | 2.2% | 1.52% |
| 2006 | 4,273,591 | 5,963,200 | 2.73% | 1.6% |
| 2007 | 4,398,942 | 6,056,236 | 2.93% | 1.56% |
| 2008 | 4,489,544 | 6,148,969 | 2.06% | 1.53% |
| 2009 | 4,535,375 | 6,241,642 | 1.02% | 1.51% |
| 2010 | 4,560,155 | 6,334,194 | 0.55% | 1.48% |
| 2011 | 4,580,084 | 6,426,590 | 0.44% | 1.46% |
| 2012 | 4,599,533 | 6,518,978 | 0.42% | 1.44% |
| 2013 | 4,623,816 | 6,611,385 | 0.53% | 1.42% |
| 2014 | 4,657,740 | 6,703,172 | 0.73% | 1.39% |
| 2015 | 4,701,957 | 6,801,645 | 0.95% | 1.47% |
| 2016 | 4,762,722 | 6,908,802 | 1.29% | 1.58% |
| 2017 | 4,827,445 | 7,018,147 | 1.36% | 1.58% |
| 2018 | 4,898,022 | 7,128,045 | 1.46% | 1.57% |
| 2019 | 4,976,456 | 7,237,636 | 1.6% | 1.54% |
| 2020 | 5,039,747 | 7,346,533 | 1.27% | 1.5% |
| 2021 | 5,110,585 | 7,453,194 | 1.41% | 1.45% |
| 2022 | 5,212,836 | 7,559,007 | 2% | 1.42% |
| 2023 | 5,307,600 | 7,664,993 | 1.82% | 1.4% |
| 2024 | 5,380,257 | 7,769,819 | 1.37% | 1.37% |
| 2025 | 5,434,538 | 7,873,043 | 1.01% | 1.33% |
| 2026 | 5,484,615 | 7,974,020 | 0.92% | 1.28% |
| 2027 | 5,531,657 | 8,072,924 | 0.86% | 1.24% |
| 2028 | 5,576,425 | 8,169,794 | 0.81% | 1.2% |
| 2029 | 5,618,258 | 8,264,394 | 0.75% | 1.16% |
| 2030 | 5,656,768 | 8,357,024 | 0.69% | 1.12% |
| 2031 | 5,693,185 | 8,447,769 | 0.64% | 1.09% |
| 2032 | 5,728,435 | 8,536,450 | 0.62% | 1.05% |
| 2033 | 5,761,833 | 8,622,824 | 0.58% | 1.01% |
| 2034 | 5,793,145 | 8,706,826 | 0.54% | 0.97% |
| 2035 | 5,822,398 | 8,788,759 | 0.5% | 0.94% |
| 2036 | 5,850,388 | 8,868,880 | 0.48% | 0.91% |
| 2037 | 5,878,309 | 8,947,241 | 0.48% | 0.88% |
| 2038 | 5,905,728 | 9,023,864 | 0.47% | 0.86% |
| 2039 | 5,931,438 | 9,097,889 | 0.44% | 0.82% |
| 2040 | 5,956,212 | 9,168,998 | 0.42% | 0.78% |
| 2041 | 5,980,704 | 9,238,108 | 0.41% | 0.75% |
| 2042 | 6,002,968 | 9,305,405 | 0.37% | 0.73% |
| 2043 | 6,022,662 | 9,370,049 | 0.33% | 0.69% |
| 2044 | 6,041,053 | 9,432,310 | 0.31% | 0.66% |
| 2045 | 6,057,952 | 9,492,501 | 0.28% | 0.64% |
| 2046 | 6,072,174 | 9,550,341 | 0.23% | 0.61% |
| 2047 | 6,084,484 | 9,605,804 | 0.2% | 0.58% |
| 2048 | 6,096,077 | 9,659,037 | 0.19% | 0.55% |
| 2049 | 6,105,740 | 9,709,614 | 0.16% | 0.52% |
| 2050 | 6,112,322 | 9,757,279 | 0.11% | 0.49% |
From 2005 to 2015, the population of Ireland increased by 542,043 people (a 13% growth), while Laos gained 932,122 people (a 15.9% growth).
For the next 10 years, from 2015 to 2025, Ireland gained 772,806 (a 16.4% growth), while Laos' population increased by 1,152,510 (a 16.9% growth).
Ireland was ranked 121st most populous country in 2005 and is still 121st in 2025. Laos was ranked 103rd in 2005 and still ranked 103rd now.
The UN's World Population Prospects forecasts that with changing growth rate trends in 25 years (in 2050) Ireland's population will grow by 11.6% to 6,112,322 people with a rank change from 121st to 120th. The population of Laos will increase by 22.7% to 9,757,279 people and rank change from 103rd to 99th.
Biggest cities by population
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population differences between Ireland and Laos
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy | 82.7 years | 69.5 years |
| Average age | 39.4 years | 28.3 years |
| Median age | 39.7 years | 25.6 years |
| Male:Female ratio | 49.5:50.5 | 50.2:49.8 |
| Fertility rate | 1.5 births per woman | 2.42 births per woman |
| Population density | 202.3 ppl/mi² | 87.2 ppl/mi² |
Population map with other countries
Population
Growth rate visualization in other countries
Growth rate
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population comparisons