Portugal has a population density of 302 people per square mile compared to 1,563 people in Rwanda. Portugal has 92,822 sq ft of land per person vs 19,886 sq ft in Rwanda. Portugal and Rwanda rank 81st and 13th by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Portugal has 0.13% of the world's population and 0.06% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.18% of the population and 0.02% of the land area for Rwanda, making the population density in Portugal 80.7% lower than in Rwanda.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
Portugal
|
Rwanda
|
|
| 2026 | 302 | 1,563 |
| 2025 | 302 | 1,529 |
| 2024 | 302 | 1,497 |
| 2023 | 299.1 | 1,465 |
| 2022 | 295 | 1,433 |
| 2021 | 293 | 1,402 |
| 2020 | 291.1 | 1,372 |
| 2019 | 290.8 | 1,341 |
| 2018 | 290.8 | 1,311 |
| 2017 | 291.2 | 1,281 |
| 2016 | 291.9 | 1,251 |
| 2015 | 292.9 | 1,222 |
| 2014 | 294.1 | 1,193 |
| 2013 | 295.7 | 1,165 |
| 2012 | 297.3 | 1,137 |
| 2011 | 298.5 | 1,110 |
| 2010 | 299 | 1,083 |
| 2009 | 298.8 | 1,056 |
| 2008 | 299 | 1,029 |
| 2007 | 298.5 | 1,003 |
| 2006 | 297.9 | 976 |
| 2005 | 297.4 | 951 |
| 2004 | 296.8 | 926 |
| 2003 | 296 | 901 |
| 2002 | 294.9 | 882 |
| 2001 | 293.3 | 870 |
| 2000 | 291.3 | 862 |
| 1999 | 289.2 | 855 |
| 1998 | 287.6 | 848 |
| 1997 | 286.1 | 814 |
| 1996 | 284.9 | 704 |
| 1995 | 283.8 | 596 |
| 1994 | 282.8 | 713 |
| 1993 | 282.1 | 838 |
| 1992 | 281.7 | 807 |
| 1991 | 281.9 | 790 |
| 1990 | 282.6 | 774 |
| 1989 | 283.2 | 754 |
| 1988 | 283.6 | 732 |
| 1987 | 283.9 | 709 |
| 1986 | 284 | 686 |
| 1985 | 283.7 | 663 |
| 1984 | 283 | 641 |
| 1983 | 281.9 | 620 |
| 1982 | 280.6 | 600 |
| 1981 | 278.9 | 580 |
| 1980 | 276.4 | 562 |
| 1979 | 273.5 | 545 |
| 1978 | 270.6 | 529 |
| 1977 | 267.7 | 513 |
| 1976 | 264.8 | 498 |
| 1975 | 257.4 | 484 |
| 1974 | 247.8 | 470 |
| 1973 | 244.4 | 456 |
| 1972 | 244.3 | 443 |
| 1971 | 244.7 | 430 |
| 1970 | 245.7 | 418 |
| 1969 | 247.9 | 405 |
| 1968 | 250.1 | 393 |
| 1967 | 251.2 | 381 |
| 1966 | 252.8 | 370 |
| 1965 | 254.7 | 359 |
| 1964 | 255.8 | 350 |
| 1963 | 255.6 | 342 |
| 1962 | 254.6 | 334 |
| 1961 | 252.8 | 326 |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (2025–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/portugal/rwanda | CC BY 
From 2006 to 2026, population density in Portugal increased by 1.23%, compared to a 60.1% growth in Rwanda.
In 2006, Portugal ranked 68th by population density and is 81st now. Rwanda was 18th in 2006 and ranks 13th out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
Portugal
|
Rwanda
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 302 ppl/mi² | 1,563 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 81/197 | 13/197 |
| Population |
10667081
|
14975051
|
| Land area | 35,369 sq mi | 9,525 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 92,199 sq ft | 18,626 sq ft |
| Rural population | 38.7% | 70.1% |
| Urban population | 61.3% | 29.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 11.7% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Portugal
|
Rwanda
|
|
| 2024 | 61.3% | 29.9% |
| 2023 | 61.2% | 28.9% |
| 2022 | 61.1% | 27.8% |
| 2021 | 61.1% | 26.1% |
| 2020 | 61.1% | 24.5% |
| 2019 | 61.1% | 23% |
| 2018 | 61.1% | 21.5% |
| 2017 | 61.1% | 20.2% |
| 2016 | 61.1% | 19.1% |
| 2015 | 61.1% | 18.2% |
| 2014 | 61.1% | 17.5% |
| 2013 | 61.1% | 17.1% |
| 2012 | 61.1% | 16.9% |
| 2011 | 61.1% | 16.9% |
| 2010 | 61.1% | 16.9% |
| 2009 | 60.8% | 16.9% |
| 2008 | 60.4% | 16.9% |
| 2007 | 59.7% | 16.9% |
| 2006 | 59% | 16.9% |
| 2005 | 58.2% | 16.9% |
| 2004 | 57.4% | 16.9% |
| 2003 | 56.6% | 16.9% |
| 2002 | 55.8% | 16.9% |
| 2001 | 55.1% | 16.5% |
| 2000 | 54.4% | 15.8% |
| 1999 | 53.7% | 14.7% |
| 1998 | 53.1% | 13.3% |
| 1997 | 52.4% | 11.8% |
| 1996 | 51.7% | 10.3% |
| 1995 | 51% | 8.82% |
| 1994 | 50.3% | 7.48% |
| 1993 | 49.7% | 6.4% |
| 1992 | 49% | 5.66% |
| 1991 | 48.4% | 5.36% |
| 1990 | 47.7% | 5.27% |
| 1989 | 47.1% | 5.2% |
| 1988 | 46.5% | 5.14% |
| 1987 | 45.8% | 5.09% |
| 1986 | 45.2% | 5.05% |
| 1985 | 44.5% | 5.01% |
| 1984 | 43.9% | 4.98% |
| 1983 | 43.2% | 4.95% |
| 1982 | 42.6% | 4.91% |
| 1981 | 41.9% | 4.87% |
| 1980 | 41.3% | 4.82% |
| 1979 | 40.6% | 4.75% |
| 1978 | 40% | 4.67% |
| 1977 | 39.3% | 4.55% |
| 1976 | 38.7% | 4.39% |
| 1975 | 38.1% | 4.19% |
| 1974 | 37.5% | 3.97% |
| 1973 | 36.9% | 3.75% |
| 1972 | 36.3% | 3.55% |
| 1971 | 35.8% | 3.37% |
| 1970 | 35.2% | 3.24% |
| 1969 | 34.7% | 3.14% |
| 1968 | 34.2% | 3.06% |
| 1967 | 33.7% | 3% |
| 1966 | 33.2% | 2.94% |
| 1965 | 32.7% | 2.88% |
| 1964 | 32.3% | 2.83% |
| 1963 | 31.9% | 2.78% |
| 1962 | 31.5% | 2.72% |
| 1961 | 31.2% | 2.67% |
| 1960 | 30.8% | 2.6% |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/portugal/rwanda | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 57.4% to 61.3% in Portugal and from 16.9% to 29.9% in Rwanda.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/portugal/rwanda | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2012–2024, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.