Portugal has a population density of 303 people per square mile compared to 204.7 people in Tunisia. Portugal has 92,762 sq ft of land per person vs 143,444 sq ft in Tunisia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Portugal and Tunisia are ranked 81st and 108th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Portugal has 0.13% of the world's population and 0.06% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.15% of the population and 0.1% of the land area for Tunisia, hence the population density in Portugal is 47.8% higher than in Tunisia.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 303 ppl/mi² | 204.7 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 81/197 | 108/197 |
| Population |
10687819
|
12402051
|
| Land area | 35,369 sq mi | 59,985 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 92,139 sq ft | 136,211 sq ft |
| Rural population | 31.6% | 29.1% |
| Urban population | 68.4% | 70.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Portugal vs Tunisia:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Portugal increased by 1.96%, compared to a 20.8% growth in Tunisia.
In 2004, Portugal ranked 68th for population density and is in 81st place now. Tunisia was 105th in 2004 and ranks 108th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 303 | 204.7 |
| 2023 | 299.1 | 203.4 |
| 2022 | 295 | 202 |
| 2021 | 293 | 200.9 |
| 2020 | 291.1 | 199.6 |
| 2019 | 290.8 | 198 |
| 2018 | 290.8 | 196.1 |
| 2017 | 291.2 | 194.2 |
| 2016 | 291.9 | 192.2 |
| 2015 | 292.9 | 190.1 |
| 2014 | 294.1 | 188 |
| 2013 | 295.7 | 185.7 |
| 2012 | 297.3 | 183.5 |
| 2011 | 298.5 | 181.5 |
| 2010 | 299 | 179.5 |
| 2009 | 298.8 | 177.6 |
| 2008 | 299 | 175.8 |
| 2007 | 298.5 | 174.1 |
| 2006 | 297.9 | 172.5 |
| 2005 | 297.4 | 171 |
| 2004 | 296.8 | 169.5 |
| 2003 | 296 | 167.9 |
| 2002 | 294.9 | 166.2 |
| 2001 | 293.3 | 164.5 |
| 2000 | 291.3 | 162.8 |
| 1999 | 289.2 | 161 |
| 1998 | 287.6 | 159.1 |
| 1997 | 286.1 | 157.1 |
| 1996 | 284.9 | 154.9 |
| 1995 | 283.8 | 152.7 |
| 1994 | 282.8 | 150.3 |
| 1993 | 282.1 | 147.7 |
| 1992 | 281.7 | 144.7 |
| 1991 | 281.9 | 141.7 |
| 1990 | 282.6 | 138.8 |
| 1989 | 283.2 | 135.9 |
| 1988 | 283.6 | 132.9 |
| 1987 | 283.9 | 129.9 |
| 1986 | 284 | 126.7 |
| 1985 | 283.7 | 123.5 |
| 1984 | 283 | 120.4 |
| 1983 | 281.9 | 117.6 |
| 1982 | 280.6 | 115.2 |
| 1981 | 278.9 | 112.7 |
| 1980 | 276.4 | 110.1 |
| 1979 | 273.5 | 107.6 |
| 1978 | 270.6 | 105.2 |
| 1977 | 267.7 | 102.6 |
| 1976 | 264.8 | 100 |
| 1975 | 257.4 | 97.3 |
| 1974 | 247.8 | 94.8 |
| 1973 | 244.4 | 92.3 |
| 1972 | 244.3 | 90 |
| 1971 | 244.7 | 87.7 |
| 1970 | 245.7 | 85.5 |
| 1969 | 247.9 | 83.4 |
| 1968 | 250.1 | 81.4 |
| 1967 | 251.2 | 79.4 |
| 1966 | 252.8 | 77.6 |
| 1965 | 254.7 | 76 |
| 1964 | 255.8 | 74.9 |
| 1963 | 255.6 | 73.8 |
| 1962 | 254.6 | 72.8 |
| 1961 | 252.8 | 72 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 68.4% | 70.9% |
| 2023 | 67.9% | 70.5% |
| 2022 | 67.4% | 70.2% |
| 2021 | 66.8% | 69.9% |
| 2020 | 66.3% | 69.6% |
| 2019 | 65.8% | 69.3% |
| 2018 | 65.2% | 68.9% |
| 2017 | 64.7% | 68.6% |
| 2016 | 64.1% | 68.3% |
| 2015 | 63.5% | 68.1% |
| 2014 | 62.9% | 67.8% |
| 2013 | 62.4% | 67.5% |
| 2012 | 61.8% | 67.2% |
| 2011 | 61.2% | 66.9% |
| 2010 | 60.6% | 66.7% |
| 2009 | 60% | 66.4% |
| 2008 | 59.4% | 66.1% |
| 2007 | 58.7% | 65.8% |
| 2006 | 58.1% | 65.5% |
| 2005 | 57.5% | 65.2% |
| 2004 | 56.9% | 65% |
| 2003 | 56.3% | 64.6% |
| 2002 | 55.7% | 64.2% |
| 2001 | 55% | 63.8% |
| 2000 | 54.4% | 63.4% |
| 1999 | 53.7% | 63% |
| 1998 | 53.1% | 62.7% |
| 1997 | 52.4% | 62.3% |
| 1996 | 51.8% | 61.9% |
| 1995 | 51.1% | 61.5% |
| 1994 | 50.4% | 61.1% |
| 1993 | 49.8% | 60.4% |
| 1992 | 49.1% | 59.6% |
| 1991 | 48.5% | 58.8% |
| 1990 | 47.9% | 57.9% |
| 1989 | 47.4% | 57.1% |
| 1988 | 46.9% | 56.3% |
| 1987 | 46.3% | 55.5% |
| 1986 | 45.8% | 54.7% |
| 1985 | 45.3% | 53.8% |
| 1984 | 44.8% | 53% |
| 1983 | 44.3% | 52.4% |
| 1982 | 43.7% | 51.8% |
| 1981 | 43.2% | 51.2% |
| 1980 | 42.8% | 50.6% |
| 1979 | 42.4% | 50% |
| 1978 | 42% | 49.4% |
| 1977 | 41.6% | 48.8% |
| 1976 | 41.2% | 48.2% |
| 1975 | 40.8% | 47.6% |
| 1974 | 40.4% | 46.8% |
| 1973 | 40% | 46% |
| 1972 | 39.6% | 45.1% |
| 1971 | 39.2% | 44.3% |
| 1970 | 38.8% | 43.5% |
| 1969 | 38.4% | 42.7% |
| 1968 | 38% | 41.8% |
| 1967 | 37.6% | 41% |
| 1966 | 37.3% | 40.2% |
| 1965 | 36.9% | 39.7% |
| 1964 | 36.5% | 39.3% |
| 1963 | 36.1% | 38.8% |
| 1962 | 35.7% | 38.4% |
| 1961 | 35.3% | 38% |
| 1960 | 35% | 37.5% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 56.9% to 68.4% in Portugal and from 65% to 70.9% in Tunisia.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons