Portugal has a population density of 303 people per square mile compared to 96.3 people in the United States. Portugal has 92,762 sq ft of land per person vs 310,997 sq ft in the United States. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Portugal and the United States are ranked 81st and 149th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Portugal has 0.13% of the world's population and 0.06% of the land area of all countries, compared to 4.18% of the population and 6.14% of the land area for the United States, hence the population density in Portugal is 214.2% higher than in the United States.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 303 ppl/mi² | 96.3 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 81/197 | 149/197 |
| Population |
10687819
|
343323530
|
| Land area | 35,369 sq mi | 3,531,839 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 92,139 sq ft | 289,500 sq ft |
| Rural population | 31.6% | 16.5% |
| Urban population | 68.4% | 83.5% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 7.68% |
Portugal vs the United States:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Portugal increased by 1.96%, compared to a 16.3% growth in the United States.
In 2004, Portugal ranked 68th for population density and is in 81st place now. The United States was 145th in 2004 and ranks 149th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 303 | 96.3 |
| 2023 | 299.1 | 94.8 |
| 2022 | 295 | 94.4 |
| 2021 | 293 | 94 |
| 2020 | 291.1 | 93.9 |
| 2019 | 290.8 | 93 |
| 2018 | 290.8 | 92.5 |
| 2017 | 291.2 | 92.1 |
| 2016 | 291.9 | 91.5 |
| 2015 | 292.9 | 90.8 |
| 2014 | 294.1 | 90.1 |
| 2013 | 295.7 | 89.5 |
| 2012 | 297.3 | 88.9 |
| 2011 | 298.5 | 88.2 |
| 2010 | 299 | 87.6 |
| 2009 | 298.8 | 86.9 |
| 2008 | 299 | 86.1 |
| 2007 | 298.5 | 85.2 |
| 2006 | 297.9 | 84.3 |
| 2005 | 297.4 | 83.5 |
| 2004 | 296.8 | 82.8 |
| 2003 | 296 | 82 |
| 2002 | 294.9 | 81.3 |
| 2001 | 293.3 | 80.6 |
| 2000 | 291.3 | 79.8 |
| 1999 | 289.2 | 79 |
| 1998 | 287.6 | 78.1 |
| 1997 | 286.1 | 77.2 |
| 1996 | 284.9 | 76.3 |
| 1995 | 283.8 | 75.4 |
| 1994 | 282.8 | 74.5 |
| 1993 | 282.1 | 73.6 |
| 1992 | 281.7 | 72.6 |
| 1991 | 281.9 | 71.7 |
| 1990 | 282.6 | 70.7 |
| 1989 | 283.2 | 69.8 |
| 1988 | 283.6 | 69.1 |
| 1987 | 283.9 | 68.5 |
| 1986 | 284 | 67.9 |
| 1985 | 283.7 | 67.3 |
| 1984 | 283 | 66.7 |
| 1983 | 281.9 | 66.1 |
| 1982 | 280.6 | 65.5 |
| 1981 | 278.9 | 64.9 |
| 1980 | 276.4 | 64.1 |
| 1979 | 273.5 | 63.6 |
| 1978 | 270.6 | 62.9 |
| 1977 | 267.7 | 62.3 |
| 1976 | 264.8 | 61.7 |
| 1975 | 257.4 | 61.1 |
| 1974 | 247.8 | 60.5 |
| 1973 | 244.4 | 59.9 |
| 1972 | 244.3 | 59.4 |
| 1971 | 244.7 | 58.7 |
| 1970 | 245.7 | 58 |
| 1969 | 247.9 | 57.3 |
| 1968 | 250.1 | 56.8 |
| 1967 | 251.2 | 56.2 |
| 1966 | 252.8 | 55.6 |
| 1965 | 254.7 | 54.9 |
| 1964 | 255.8 | 54.3 |
| 1963 | 255.6 | 53.5 |
| 1962 | 254.6 | 52.7 |
| 1961 | 252.8 | 51.9 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 68.4% | 83.5% |
| 2023 | 67.9% | 83.3% |
| 2022 | 67.4% | 83.1% |
| 2021 | 66.8% | 82.9% |
| 2020 | 66.3% | 82.7% |
| 2019 | 65.8% | 82.5% |
| 2018 | 65.2% | 82.3% |
| 2017 | 64.7% | 82.1% |
| 2016 | 64.1% | 81.9% |
| 2015 | 63.5% | 81.7% |
| 2014 | 62.9% | 81.5% |
| 2013 | 62.4% | 81.3% |
| 2012 | 61.8% | 81.1% |
| 2011 | 61.2% | 80.9% |
| 2010 | 60.6% | 80.8% |
| 2009 | 60% | 80.6% |
| 2008 | 59.4% | 80.4% |
| 2007 | 58.7% | 80.3% |
| 2006 | 58.1% | 80.1% |
| 2005 | 57.5% | 79.9% |
| 2004 | 56.9% | 79.8% |
| 2003 | 56.3% | 79.6% |
| 2002 | 55.7% | 79.4% |
| 2001 | 55% | 79.2% |
| 2000 | 54.4% | 79.1% |
| 1999 | 53.7% | 78.7% |
| 1998 | 53.1% | 78.4% |
| 1997 | 52.4% | 78% |
| 1996 | 51.8% | 77.6% |
| 1995 | 51.1% | 77.3% |
| 1994 | 50.4% | 76.9% |
| 1993 | 49.8% | 76.5% |
| 1992 | 49.1% | 76.1% |
| 1991 | 48.5% | 75.7% |
| 1990 | 47.9% | 75.3% |
| 1989 | 47.4% | 75.1% |
| 1988 | 46.9% | 74.9% |
| 1987 | 46.3% | 74.8% |
| 1986 | 45.8% | 74.6% |
| 1985 | 45.3% | 74.5% |
| 1984 | 44.8% | 74.3% |
| 1983 | 44.3% | 74.2% |
| 1982 | 43.7% | 74% |
| 1981 | 43.2% | 73.9% |
| 1980 | 42.8% | 73.7% |
| 1979 | 42.4% | 73.7% |
| 1978 | 42% | 73.7% |
| 1977 | 41.6% | 73.7% |
| 1976 | 41.2% | 73.7% |
| 1975 | 40.8% | 73.7% |
| 1974 | 40.4% | 73.6% |
| 1973 | 40% | 73.6% |
| 1972 | 39.6% | 73.6% |
| 1971 | 39.2% | 73.6% |
| 1970 | 38.8% | 73.6% |
| 1969 | 38.4% | 73.3% |
| 1968 | 38% | 73% |
| 1967 | 37.6% | 72.6% |
| 1966 | 37.3% | 72.2% |
| 1965 | 36.9% | 71.9% |
| 1964 | 36.5% | 71.5% |
| 1963 | 36.1% | 71.1% |
| 1962 | 35.7% | 70.8% |
| 1961 | 35.3% | 70.4% |
| 1960 | 35% | 70% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 56.9% to 68.4% in Portugal and from 79.8% to 83.5% in the United States.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Lisbon | 546K |
| Sintra | 386K |
| Vila Nova de Gaia | 304K |
| Cascais | 214K |
| Loures | 202K |
| Braga | 193K |
| Oeiras | 172K |
| Amadora | 171K |
| Seixal | 167K |
| Odivelas | 148K |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| New York | 8.8M |
| Los Angeles | 3.9M |
| Chicago | 2.75M |
| Houston | 2.3M |
| Phoenix | 1.61M |
| Philadelphia | 1.6M |
| San Antonio | 1.43M |
| San Diego | 1.39M |
| Dallas | 1.3M |
| San Jose | 1.01M |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons