Portugal has a population density of 303 people per square mile compared to 310 people in Sierra Leone. Portugal has 92,762 sq ft of land per person vs 89,354 sq ft in Sierra Leone. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Portugal and Sierra Leone are ranked 81st and 77th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Portugal has 0.13% of the world's population and 0.06% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.11% of the population and 0.05% of the land area for Sierra Leone, hence the population density in Portugal is 2.43% lower than in Sierra Leone.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 303 ppl/mi² | 310 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 81/197 | 77/197 |
| Population |
10687819
|
8961932
|
| Land area | 35,369 sq mi | 27,869 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 92,139 sq ft | 89,902 sq ft |
| Rural population | 31.6% | 55.2% |
| Urban population | 68.4% | 44.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Portugal vs Sierra Leone:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Portugal increased by 1.96%, compared to a 61.4% growth in Sierra Leone.
In 2004, Portugal ranked 68th for population density and is in 81st place now. Sierra Leone was 95th in 2004 and ranks 77th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 303 | 310 |
| 2023 | 299.1 | 304 |
| 2022 | 295 | 297 |
| 2021 | 293 | 290.5 |
| 2020 | 291.1 | 283.9 |
| 2019 | 290.8 | 277.4 |
| 2018 | 290.8 | 271.1 |
| 2017 | 291.2 | 264.8 |
| 2016 | 291.9 | 258.5 |
| 2015 | 292.9 | 252.5 |
| 2014 | 294.1 | 246.7 |
| 2013 | 295.7 | 240.9 |
| 2012 | 297.3 | 235.1 |
| 2011 | 298.5 | 229.2 |
| 2010 | 299 | 223.3 |
| 2009 | 298.8 | 217.3 |
| 2008 | 299 | 211.5 |
| 2007 | 298.5 | 206.3 |
| 2006 | 297.9 | 201.8 |
| 2005 | 297.4 | 197.4 |
| 2004 | 296.8 | 192.2 |
| 2003 | 296 | 185.8 |
| 2002 | 294.9 | 178.4 |
| 2001 | 293.3 | 168.4 |
| 2000 | 291.3 | 158.7 |
| 1999 | 289.2 | 154.9 |
| 1998 | 287.6 | 154.1 |
| 1997 | 286.1 | 152.6 |
| 1996 | 284.9 | 150.7 |
| 1995 | 283.8 | 150 |
| 1994 | 282.8 | 149.7 |
| 1993 | 282.1 | 149.2 |
| 1992 | 281.7 | 149.5 |
| 1991 | 281.9 | 152.4 |
| 1990 | 282.6 | 150.6 |
| 1989 | 283.2 | 144.8 |
| 1988 | 283.6 | 141.2 |
| 1987 | 283.9 | 137.4 |
| 1986 | 284 | 133.8 |
| 1985 | 283.7 | 130.6 |
| 1984 | 283 | 127.7 |
| 1983 | 281.9 | 124.9 |
| 1982 | 280.6 | 122.3 |
| 1981 | 278.9 | 119.8 |
| 1980 | 276.4 | 117.4 |
| 1979 | 273.5 | 115.1 |
| 1978 | 270.6 | 112.9 |
| 1977 | 267.7 | 110.7 |
| 1976 | 264.8 | 108.7 |
| 1975 | 257.4 | 106.7 |
| 1974 | 247.8 | 104.8 |
| 1973 | 244.4 | 102.9 |
| 1972 | 244.3 | 101 |
| 1971 | 244.7 | 99.2 |
| 1970 | 245.7 | 97.3 |
| 1969 | 247.9 | 95.5 |
| 1968 | 250.1 | 93.7 |
| 1967 | 251.2 | 91.9 |
| 1966 | 252.8 | 90.2 |
| 1965 | 254.7 | 88.6 |
| 1964 | 255.8 | 87 |
| 1963 | 255.6 | 85.5 |
| 1962 | 254.6 | 84 |
| 1961 | 252.8 | 82.7 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 68.4% | 44.8% |
| 2023 | 67.9% | 44.3% |
| 2022 | 67.4% | 43.8% |
| 2021 | 66.8% | 43.4% |
| 2020 | 66.3% | 42.9% |
| 2019 | 65.8% | 42.5% |
| 2018 | 65.2% | 42.1% |
| 2017 | 64.7% | 41.6% |
| 2016 | 64.1% | 41.2% |
| 2015 | 63.5% | 40.8% |
| 2014 | 62.9% | 40.4% |
| 2013 | 62.4% | 40% |
| 2012 | 61.8% | 39.6% |
| 2011 | 61.2% | 39.2% |
| 2010 | 60.6% | 38.9% |
| 2009 | 60% | 38.5% |
| 2008 | 59.4% | 38.1% |
| 2007 | 58.7% | 37.7% |
| 2006 | 58.1% | 37.3% |
| 2005 | 57.5% | 36.9% |
| 2004 | 56.9% | 36.6% |
| 2003 | 56.3% | 36.4% |
| 2002 | 55.7% | 36.1% |
| 2001 | 55% | 35.9% |
| 2000 | 54.4% | 35.6% |
| 1999 | 53.7% | 35.4% |
| 1998 | 53.1% | 35.1% |
| 1997 | 52.4% | 34.9% |
| 1996 | 51.8% | 34.7% |
| 1995 | 51.1% | 34.4% |
| 1994 | 50.4% | 34.2% |
| 1993 | 49.8% | 34% |
| 1992 | 49.1% | 33.7% |
| 1991 | 48.5% | 33.5% |
| 1990 | 47.9% | 33.3% |
| 1989 | 47.4% | 33% |
| 1988 | 46.9% | 32.8% |
| 1987 | 46.3% | 32.6% |
| 1986 | 45.8% | 32.3% |
| 1985 | 45.3% | 32% |
| 1984 | 44.8% | 31.6% |
| 1983 | 44.3% | 31.1% |
| 1982 | 43.7% | 30.7% |
| 1981 | 43.2% | 30.2% |
| 1980 | 42.8% | 29.8% |
| 1979 | 42.4% | 29.4% |
| 1978 | 42% | 29% |
| 1977 | 41.6% | 28.6% |
| 1976 | 41.2% | 28.1% |
| 1975 | 40.8% | 27.7% |
| 1974 | 40.4% | 27.1% |
| 1973 | 40% | 26.3% |
| 1972 | 39.6% | 25.5% |
| 1971 | 39.2% | 24.7% |
| 1970 | 38.8% | 24% |
| 1969 | 38.4% | 23.2% |
| 1968 | 38% | 22.5% |
| 1967 | 37.6% | 21.8% |
| 1966 | 37.3% | 21.1% |
| 1965 | 36.9% | 20.4% |
| 1964 | 36.5% | 19.7% |
| 1963 | 36.1% | 19.1% |
| 1962 | 35.7% | 18.5% |
| 1961 | 35.3% | 17.9% |
| 1960 | 35% | 17.4% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 56.9% to 68.4% in Portugal and from 36.6% to 44.8% in Sierra Leone.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons