Pakistan has a population density of 844 people per square mile compared to 303 people in Portugal. Pakistan has 37,780 sq ft of land per person vs 92,762 sq ft in Portugal. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Pakistan and Portugal are ranked 29th and 81st, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Pakistan has 3.09% of the world's population and 0.52% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.13% of the population and 0.06% of the land area for Portugal, hence the population density in Pakistan is 179% higher than in Portugal.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 844 ppl/mi² | 303 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 29/197 | 81/197 |
| Population |
258497127
|
10687819
|
| Land area | 297,638 sq mi | 35,369 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 33,023 sq ft | 92,139 sq ft |
| Rural population | 61.6% | 31.6% |
| Urban population | 38.4% | 68.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 16.3% | 0% |
Pakistan vs Portugal:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Pakistan increased by 46.7%, compared to a 1.96% growth in Portugal.
In 2004, Pakistan ranked 38th for population density and is in 29th place now. Portugal was 68th in 2004 and ranks 81st out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 844 | 303 |
| 2023 | 832 | 299.1 |
| 2022 | 819 | 295 |
| 2021 | 805 | 293 |
| 2020 | 790 | 291.1 |
| 2019 | 775 | 290.8 |
| 2018 | 762 | 290.8 |
| 2017 | 750 | 291.2 |
| 2016 | 740 | 291.9 |
| 2015 | 730 | 292.9 |
| 2014 | 720 | 294.1 |
| 2013 | 709 | 295.7 |
| 2012 | 698 | 297.3 |
| 2011 | 685 | 298.5 |
| 2010 | 669 | 299 |
| 2009 | 653 | 298.8 |
| 2008 | 637 | 299 |
| 2007 | 620 | 298.5 |
| 2006 | 604 | 297.9 |
| 2005 | 589 | 297.4 |
| 2004 | 575 | 296.8 |
| 2003 | 561 | 296 |
| 2002 | 548 | 294.9 |
| 2001 | 535 | 293.3 |
| 2000 | 520 | 291.3 |
| 1999 | 506 | 289.2 |
| 1998 | 492 | 287.6 |
| 1997 | 479 | 286.1 |
| 1996 | 466 | 284.9 |
| 1995 | 452 | 283.8 |
| 1994 | 439 | 282.8 |
| 1993 | 427 | 282.1 |
| 1992 | 415 | 281.7 |
| 1991 | 403 | 281.9 |
| 1990 | 390 | 282.6 |
| 1989 | 377 | 283.2 |
| 1988 | 365 | 283.6 |
| 1987 | 353 | 283.9 |
| 1986 | 341 | 284 |
| 1985 | 330 | 283.7 |
| 1984 | 320 | 283 |
| 1983 | 310 | 281.9 |
| 1982 | 299.3 | 280.6 |
| 1981 | 288.3 | 278.9 |
| 1980 | 276.5 | 276.4 |
| 1979 | 265.4 | 273.5 |
| 1978 | 256.4 | 270.6 |
| 1977 | 248.3 | 267.7 |
| 1976 | 240.6 | 264.8 |
| 1975 | 233.4 | 257.4 |
| 1974 | 226.5 | 247.8 |
| 1973 | 219.9 | 244.4 |
| 1972 | 213.6 | 244.3 |
| 1971 | 207.8 | 244.7 |
| 1970 | 202.1 | 245.7 |
| 1969 | 196.4 | 247.9 |
| 1968 | 190.9 | 250.1 |
| 1967 | 185.5 | 251.2 |
| 1966 | 180.3 | 252.8 |
| 1965 | 175.4 | 254.7 |
| 1964 | 170.7 | 255.8 |
| 1963 | 166.1 | 255.6 |
| 1962 | 161.8 | 254.6 |
| 1961 | 157.6 | 252.8 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 38.4% | 68.4% |
| 2023 | 38% | 67.9% |
| 2022 | 37.7% | 67.4% |
| 2021 | 37.4% | 66.8% |
| 2020 | 37.2% | 66.3% |
| 2019 | 36.9% | 65.8% |
| 2018 | 36.7% | 65.2% |
| 2017 | 36.4% | 64.7% |
| 2016 | 36.2% | 64.1% |
| 2015 | 36% | 63.5% |
| 2014 | 35.8% | 62.9% |
| 2013 | 35.6% | 62.4% |
| 2012 | 35.4% | 61.8% |
| 2011 | 35.2% | 61.2% |
| 2010 | 35% | 60.6% |
| 2009 | 34.8% | 60% |
| 2008 | 34.6% | 59.4% |
| 2007 | 34.4% | 58.7% |
| 2006 | 34.2% | 58.1% |
| 2005 | 34% | 57.5% |
| 2004 | 33.8% | 56.9% |
| 2003 | 33.6% | 56.3% |
| 2002 | 33.4% | 55.7% |
| 2001 | 33.2% | 55% |
| 2000 | 33% | 54.4% |
| 1999 | 32.8% | 53.7% |
| 1998 | 32.6% | 53.1% |
| 1997 | 32.3% | 52.4% |
| 1996 | 32.1% | 51.8% |
| 1995 | 31.8% | 51.1% |
| 1994 | 31.6% | 50.4% |
| 1993 | 31.3% | 49.8% |
| 1992 | 31.1% | 49.1% |
| 1991 | 30.8% | 48.5% |
| 1990 | 30.6% | 47.9% |
| 1989 | 30.3% | 47.4% |
| 1988 | 30.1% | 46.9% |
| 1987 | 29.8% | 46.3% |
| 1986 | 29.6% | 45.8% |
| 1985 | 29.3% | 45.3% |
| 1984 | 29.1% | 44.8% |
| 1983 | 28.9% | 44.3% |
| 1982 | 28.6% | 43.7% |
| 1981 | 28.4% | 43.2% |
| 1980 | 28.1% | 42.8% |
| 1979 | 27.7% | 42.4% |
| 1978 | 27.4% | 42% |
| 1977 | 27% | 41.6% |
| 1976 | 26.7% | 41.2% |
| 1975 | 26.3% | 40.8% |
| 1974 | 26% | 40.4% |
| 1973 | 25.7% | 40% |
| 1972 | 25.4% | 39.6% |
| 1971 | 25.1% | 39.2% |
| 1970 | 24.8% | 38.8% |
| 1969 | 24.6% | 38.4% |
| 1968 | 24.3% | 38% |
| 1967 | 24% | 37.6% |
| 1966 | 23.8% | 37.3% |
| 1965 | 23.5% | 36.9% |
| 1964 | 23.3% | 36.5% |
| 1963 | 23% | 36.1% |
| 1962 | 22.8% | 35.7% |
| 1961 | 22.5% | 35.3% |
| 1960 | 22.1% | 35% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 33.8% to 38.4% in Pakistan and from 56.9% to 68.4% in Portugal.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Karachi | 14.9M |
| Lahore | 11.1M |
| Faisalabad | 3.2M |
| Rawalpindi | 2.1M |
| Gujranwala | 2.03M |
| Peshawar | 1.97M |
| Multan | 1.87M |
| Hyderabad | 1.73M |
| Islamabad | 1.01M |
| Quetta | 1M |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons