Portugal has a population density of 302 people per square mile compared to 50.1 people in Uruguay. Portugal has 92,822 sq ft of land per person vs 560,081 sq ft in Uruguay. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Portugal and Uruguay are ranked 81st and 171st, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Portugal has 0.13% of the world's population and 0.06% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.04% of the population and 0.12% of the land area for Uruguay, hence the population density in Portugal is 503% higher than in Uruguay.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 302 ppl/mi² | 50.1 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 81/197 | 171/197 |
| Population |
10663982
|
3382543
|
| Land area | 35,369 sq mi | 67,576 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 92,199 sq ft | 556,282 sq ft |
| Rural population | 38.7% | 4.4% |
| Urban population | 61.3% | 95.6% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 38.5% |
Portugal vs Uruguay:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Portugal increased by 1.89%, compared to a 3.15% growth in Uruguay.
In 2004, Portugal ranked 68th for population density and is in 81st place now. Uruguay was 156th in 2004 and ranks 171st out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 302 | 50.1 |
| 2023 | 299.1 | 50.1 |
| 2022 | 295 | 50.2 |
| 2021 | 293 | 50.3 |
| 2020 | 291.1 | 50.3 |
| 2019 | 290.8 | 50.3 |
| 2018 | 290.8 | 50.2 |
| 2017 | 291.2 | 50.1 |
| 2016 | 291.9 | 50 |
| 2015 | 292.9 | 49.8 |
| 2014 | 294.1 | 49.7 |
| 2013 | 295.7 | 49.5 |
| 2012 | 297.3 | 49.4 |
| 2011 | 298.5 | 49.2 |
| 2010 | 299 | 49.1 |
| 2009 | 298.8 | 49 |
| 2008 | 299 | 48.9 |
| 2007 | 298.5 | 48.8 |
| 2006 | 297.9 | 48.7 |
| 2005 | 297.4 | 48.6 |
| 2004 | 296.8 | 48.6 |
| 2003 | 296 | 48.6 |
| 2002 | 294.9 | 48.5 |
| 2001 | 293.3 | 48.5 |
| 2000 | 291.3 | 48.3 |
| 1999 | 289.2 | 48.2 |
| 1998 | 287.6 | 47.9 |
| 1997 | 286.1 | 47.7 |
| 1996 | 284.9 | 47.4 |
| 1995 | 283.8 | 47.2 |
| 1994 | 282.8 | 47 |
| 1993 | 282.1 | 46.7 |
| 1992 | 281.7 | 46.5 |
| 1991 | 281.9 | 46.2 |
| 1990 | 282.6 | 45.9 |
| 1989 | 283.2 | 45.7 |
| 1988 | 283.6 | 45.4 |
| 1987 | 283.9 | 45.1 |
| 1986 | 284 | 44.9 |
| 1985 | 283.7 | 44.6 |
| 1984 | 283 | 44.4 |
| 1983 | 281.9 | 44.2 |
| 1982 | 280.6 | 44 |
| 1981 | 278.9 | 43.9 |
| 1980 | 276.4 | 43.7 |
| 1979 | 273.5 | 43.5 |
| 1978 | 270.6 | 43.3 |
| 1977 | 267.7 | 43.1 |
| 1976 | 264.8 | 42.8 |
| 1975 | 257.4 | 42.5 |
| 1974 | 247.8 | 42.2 |
| 1973 | 244.4 | 42 |
| 1972 | 244.3 | 41.8 |
| 1971 | 244.7 | 41.5 |
| 1970 | 245.7 | 41.3 |
| 1969 | 247.9 | 41 |
| 1968 | 250.1 | 40.8 |
| 1967 | 251.2 | 40.4 |
| 1966 | 252.8 | 40.1 |
| 1965 | 254.7 | 39.7 |
| 1964 | 255.8 | 39.3 |
| 1963 | 255.6 | 38.8 |
| 1962 | 254.6 | 38.4 |
| 1961 | 252.8 | 37.9 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 61.3% | 95.6% |
| 2023 | 61.2% | 95.5% |
| 2022 | 61.1% | 95.5% |
| 2021 | 61.1% | 95.4% |
| 2020 | 61.1% | 95.4% |
| 2019 | 61.1% | 95.3% |
| 2018 | 61.1% | 95.3% |
| 2017 | 61.1% | 95.2% |
| 2016 | 61.1% | 95.2% |
| 2015 | 61.1% | 95.1% |
| 2014 | 61.1% | 95% |
| 2013 | 61.1% | 94.9% |
| 2012 | 61.1% | 94.8% |
| 2011 | 61.1% | 94.6% |
| 2010 | 61.1% | 94.3% |
| 2009 | 60.8% | 93.9% |
| 2008 | 60.4% | 93.5% |
| 2007 | 59.7% | 93% |
| 2006 | 59% | 92.5% |
| 2005 | 58.2% | 92.1% |
| 2004 | 57.4% | 91.8% |
| 2003 | 56.6% | 91.6% |
| 2002 | 55.8% | 91.5% |
| 2001 | 55.1% | 91.4% |
| 2000 | 54.4% | 91.3% |
| 1999 | 53.7% | 91.2% |
| 1998 | 53.1% | 91.1% |
| 1997 | 52.4% | 91% |
| 1996 | 51.7% | 90.8% |
| 1995 | 51% | 90.6% |
| 1994 | 50.3% | 90.4% |
| 1993 | 49.7% | 90.1% |
| 1992 | 49% | 89.8% |
| 1991 | 48.4% | 89.4% |
| 1990 | 47.7% | 89.1% |
| 1989 | 47.1% | 88.7% |
| 1988 | 46.5% | 88.3% |
| 1987 | 45.8% | 88% |
| 1986 | 45.2% | 87.6% |
| 1985 | 44.5% | 87.2% |
| 1984 | 43.9% | 86.8% |
| 1983 | 43.2% | 86.4% |
| 1982 | 42.6% | 85.9% |
| 1981 | 41.9% | 85.5% |
| 1980 | 41.3% | 85% |
| 1979 | 40.6% | 84.5% |
| 1978 | 40% | 84.1% |
| 1977 | 39.3% | 83.7% |
| 1976 | 38.7% | 83.3% |
| 1975 | 38.1% | 83% |
| 1974 | 37.5% | 82.8% |
| 1973 | 36.9% | 82.6% |
| 1972 | 36.3% | 82.3% |
| 1971 | 35.8% | 82.2% |
| 1970 | 35.2% | 82% |
| 1969 | 34.7% | 81.8% |
| 1968 | 34.2% | 81.6% |
| 1967 | 33.7% | 81.5% |
| 1966 | 33.2% | 81.3% |
| 1965 | 32.7% | 81.1% |
| 1964 | 32.3% | 81% |
| 1963 | 31.9% | 80.8% |
| 1962 | 31.5% | 80.6% |
| 1961 | 31.2% | 80.4% |
| 1960 | 30.8% | 80.2% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 57.4% to 61.3% in Portugal and from 91.8% to 95.6% in Uruguay.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Lisbon | 546K |
| Sintra | 386K |
| Vila Nova de Gaia | 304K |
| Cascais | 214K |
| Loures | 202K |
| Braga | 193K |
| Oeiras | 172K |
| Amadora | 171K |
| Seixal | 167K |
| Odivelas | 148K |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Montevideo | 1.3M |
| Salto | 125K |
| Ciudad de la Costa | 112K |
| Rivera | 103K |
| Maldonado | 86.8K |
| Paysandu | 76.4K |
| Tacuarembo | 54.8K |
| Melo | 51.8K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons