Bolivia has a population density of 29.7 people per square mile compared to 303 people in Portugal. Bolivia has 952,608 sq ft of land per person vs 92,762 sq ft in Portugal. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Bolivia and Portugal are ranked 183rd and 81st, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Bolivia has 0.15% of the world's population and 0.73% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.13% of the population and 0.06% of the land area for Portugal, hence the population density in Bolivia is 90.2% lower than in Portugal.
Population density comparison
Bolivia
|
Portugal
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 29.7 ppl/mi² | 303 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 183/197 | 81/197 |
| Population |
12716350
|
10687819
|
| Land area | 418,264 sq mi | 35,369 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 939,358 sq ft | 92,139 sq ft |
| Rural population | 28.5% | 31.6% |
| Urban population | 71.5% | 68.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 25.4% | 0% |
Bolivia vs Portugal:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Bolivia increased by 34.9%, compared to a 1.96% growth in Portugal.
In 2004, Bolivia ranked 177th for population density and is in 183rd place now. Portugal was 68th in 2004 and ranks 81st out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Bolivia
|
Portugal
|
|
| 2024 | 29.7 | 303 |
| 2023 | 29.3 | 299.1 |
| 2022 | 28.9 | 295 |
| 2021 | 28.5 | 293 |
| 2020 | 28.3 | 291.1 |
| 2019 | 27.9 | 290.8 |
| 2018 | 27.5 | 290.8 |
| 2017 | 27.1 | 291.2 |
| 2016 | 26.7 | 291.9 |
| 2015 | 26.3 | 292.9 |
| 2014 | 25.9 | 294.1 |
| 2013 | 25.5 | 295.7 |
| 2012 | 25.1 | 297.3 |
| 2011 | 24.7 | 298.5 |
| 2010 | 24.3 | 299 |
| 2009 | 23.9 | 298.8 |
| 2008 | 23.6 | 299 |
| 2007 | 23.2 | 298.5 |
| 2006 | 22.8 | 297.9 |
| 2005 | 22.4 | 297.4 |
| 2004 | 22 | 296.8 |
| 2003 | 21.6 | 296 |
| 2002 | 21.3 | 294.9 |
| 2001 | 20.9 | 293.3 |
| 2000 | 20.6 | 291.3 |
| 1999 | 20.2 | 289.2 |
| 1998 | 19.9 | 287.6 |
| 1997 | 19.5 | 286.1 |
| 1996 | 19.2 | 284.9 |
| 1995 | 18.8 | 283.8 |
| 1994 | 18.5 | 282.8 |
| 1993 | 18.1 | 282.1 |
| 1992 | 17.8 | 281.7 |
| 1991 | 17.4 | 281.9 |
| 1990 | 17 | 282.6 |
| 1989 | 16.7 | 283.2 |
| 1988 | 16.3 | 283.6 |
| 1987 | 16 | 283.9 |
| 1986 | 15.7 | 284 |
| 1985 | 15.3 | 283.7 |
| 1984 | 15 | 283 |
| 1983 | 14.7 | 281.9 |
| 1982 | 14.4 | 280.6 |
| 1981 | 14.1 | 278.9 |
| 1980 | 13.8 | 276.4 |
| 1979 | 13.5 | 273.5 |
| 1978 | 13.2 | 270.6 |
| 1977 | 12.9 | 267.7 |
| 1976 | 12.6 | 264.8 |
| 1975 | 12.3 | 257.4 |
| 1974 | 12 | 247.8 |
| 1973 | 11.7 | 244.4 |
| 1972 | 11.5 | 244.3 |
| 1971 | 11.2 | 244.7 |
| 1970 | 11 | 245.7 |
| 1969 | 10.7 | 247.9 |
| 1968 | 10.5 | 250.1 |
| 1967 | 10.3 | 251.2 |
| 1966 | 10 | 252.8 |
| 1965 | 9.83 | 254.7 |
| 1964 | 9.62 | 255.8 |
| 1963 | 9.42 | 255.6 |
| 1962 | 9.22 | 254.6 |
| 1961 | 9.03 | 252.8 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Bolivia
|
Portugal
|
|
| 2024 | 71.5% | 68.4% |
| 2023 | 71.2% | 67.9% |
| 2022 | 70.8% | 67.4% |
| 2021 | 70.5% | 66.8% |
| 2020 | 70.1% | 66.3% |
| 2019 | 69.8% | 65.8% |
| 2018 | 69.4% | 65.2% |
| 2017 | 69.1% | 64.7% |
| 2016 | 68.7% | 64.1% |
| 2015 | 68.4% | 63.5% |
| 2014 | 68% | 62.9% |
| 2013 | 67.7% | 62.4% |
| 2012 | 67.3% | 61.8% |
| 2011 | 66.9% | 61.2% |
| 2010 | 66.4% | 60.6% |
| 2009 | 66% | 60% |
| 2008 | 65.5% | 59.4% |
| 2007 | 65.1% | 58.7% |
| 2006 | 64.6% | 58.1% |
| 2005 | 64.2% | 57.5% |
| 2004 | 63.7% | 56.9% |
| 2003 | 63.2% | 56.3% |
| 2002 | 62.8% | 55.7% |
| 2001 | 62.3% | 55% |
| 2000 | 61.8% | 54.4% |
| 1999 | 61.3% | 53.7% |
| 1998 | 60.7% | 53.1% |
| 1997 | 60.2% | 52.4% |
| 1996 | 59.7% | 51.8% |
| 1995 | 59.2% | 51.1% |
| 1994 | 58.6% | 50.4% |
| 1993 | 58.1% | 49.8% |
| 1992 | 57.5% | 49.1% |
| 1991 | 56.6% | 48.5% |
| 1990 | 55.6% | 47.9% |
| 1989 | 54.6% | 47.4% |
| 1988 | 53.6% | 46.9% |
| 1987 | 52.5% | 46.3% |
| 1986 | 51.5% | 45.8% |
| 1985 | 50.5% | 45.3% |
| 1984 | 49.5% | 44.8% |
| 1983 | 48.5% | 44.3% |
| 1982 | 47.5% | 43.7% |
| 1981 | 46.5% | 43.2% |
| 1980 | 45.5% | 42.8% |
| 1979 | 44.4% | 42.4% |
| 1978 | 43.4% | 42% |
| 1977 | 42.4% | 41.6% |
| 1976 | 41.6% | 41.2% |
| 1975 | 41.3% | 40.8% |
| 1974 | 41% | 40.4% |
| 1973 | 40.7% | 40% |
| 1972 | 40.4% | 39.6% |
| 1971 | 40.1% | 39.2% |
| 1970 | 39.8% | 38.8% |
| 1969 | 39.5% | 38.4% |
| 1968 | 39.2% | 38% |
| 1967 | 38.9% | 37.6% |
| 1966 | 38.6% | 37.3% |
| 1965 | 38.3% | 36.9% |
| 1964 | 38% | 36.5% |
| 1963 | 37.7% | 36.1% |
| 1962 | 37.4% | 35.7% |
| 1961 | 37.1% | 35.3% |
| 1960 | 36.8% | 35% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 63.7% to 71.5% in Bolivia and from 56.9% to 68.4% in Portugal.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
