Rwanda has a population density of 1,563 people per square mile compared to 207.1 people in Tunisia. Rwanda has 19,886 sq ft of land per person vs 143,444 sq ft in Tunisia. Rwanda and Tunisia rank 13th and 110th by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Rwanda has 0.18% of the world's population and 0.02% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.15% of the population and 0.1% of the land area for Tunisia, making the population density in Rwanda 655% higher than in Tunisia.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
Rwanda
|
Tunisia
|
|
| 2026 | 1,563 | 207.1 |
| 2025 | 1,529 | 205.9 |
| 2024 | 1,497 | 204.7 |
| 2023 | 1,465 | 203.4 |
| 2022 | 1,433 | 202 |
| 2021 | 1,402 | 200.9 |
| 2020 | 1,372 | 199.6 |
| 2019 | 1,341 | 198 |
| 2018 | 1,311 | 196.1 |
| 2017 | 1,281 | 194.2 |
| 2016 | 1,251 | 192.2 |
| 2015 | 1,222 | 190.1 |
| 2014 | 1,193 | 188 |
| 2013 | 1,165 | 185.7 |
| 2012 | 1,137 | 183.5 |
| 2011 | 1,110 | 181.5 |
| 2010 | 1,083 | 179.5 |
| 2009 | 1,056 | 177.6 |
| 2008 | 1,029 | 175.8 |
| 2007 | 1,003 | 174.1 |
| 2006 | 976 | 172.5 |
| 2005 | 951 | 171 |
| 2004 | 926 | 169.5 |
| 2003 | 901 | 167.9 |
| 2002 | 882 | 166.2 |
| 2001 | 870 | 164.5 |
| 2000 | 862 | 162.8 |
| 1999 | 855 | 161 |
| 1998 | 848 | 159.1 |
| 1997 | 814 | 157.1 |
| 1996 | 704 | 154.9 |
| 1995 | 596 | 152.7 |
| 1994 | 713 | 150.3 |
| 1993 | 838 | 147.7 |
| 1992 | 807 | 144.7 |
| 1991 | 790 | 141.7 |
| 1990 | 774 | 138.8 |
| 1989 | 754 | 135.9 |
| 1988 | 732 | 132.9 |
| 1987 | 709 | 129.9 |
| 1986 | 686 | 126.7 |
| 1985 | 663 | 123.5 |
| 1984 | 641 | 120.4 |
| 1983 | 620 | 117.6 |
| 1982 | 600 | 115.2 |
| 1981 | 580 | 112.7 |
| 1980 | 562 | 110.1 |
| 1979 | 545 | 107.6 |
| 1978 | 529 | 105.2 |
| 1977 | 513 | 102.6 |
| 1976 | 498 | 100 |
| 1975 | 484 | 97.3 |
| 1974 | 470 | 94.8 |
| 1973 | 456 | 92.3 |
| 1972 | 443 | 90 |
| 1971 | 430 | 87.7 |
| 1970 | 418 | 85.5 |
| 1969 | 405 | 83.4 |
| 1968 | 393 | 81.4 |
| 1967 | 381 | 79.4 |
| 1966 | 370 | 77.6 |
| 1965 | 359 | 76 |
| 1964 | 350 | 74.9 |
| 1963 | 342 | 73.8 |
| 1962 | 334 | 72.8 |
| 1961 | 326 | 72 |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (2025–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/rwanda/tunisia | CC BY 
From 2006 to 2026, population density in Rwanda increased by 60.1%, compared to a 20% growth in Tunisia.
In 2006, Rwanda ranked 18th by population density and is 13th now. Tunisia was 107th in 2006 and ranks 110th out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
Rwanda
|
Tunisia
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 1,563 ppl/mi² | 207.1 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 13/197 | 110/197 |
| Population |
14975051
|
12437803
|
| Land area | 9,525 sq mi | 59,985 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 18,626 sq ft | 136,211 sq ft |
| Rural population | 70.1% | 29.6% |
| Urban population | 29.9% | 70.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 11.7% | 0% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Rwanda
|
Tunisia
|
|
| 2024 | 29.9% | 70.4% |
| 2023 | 28.9% | 70% |
| 2022 | 27.8% | 69.7% |
| 2021 | 26.1% | 69.4% |
| 2020 | 24.5% | 69.1% |
| 2019 | 23% | 68.8% |
| 2018 | 21.5% | 68.5% |
| 2017 | 20.2% | 68.3% |
| 2016 | 19.1% | 68.1% |
| 2015 | 18.2% | 67.9% |
| 2014 | 17.5% | 67.8% |
| 2013 | 17.1% | 67.5% |
| 2012 | 16.9% | 67.2% |
| 2011 | 16.9% | 66.9% |
| 2010 | 16.9% | 66.6% |
| 2009 | 16.9% | 66.3% |
| 2008 | 16.9% | 66.1% |
| 2007 | 16.9% | 65.8% |
| 2006 | 16.9% | 65.5% |
| 2005 | 16.9% | 65.2% |
| 2004 | 16.9% | 64.9% |
| 2003 | 16.9% | 64.6% |
| 2002 | 16.9% | 64.3% |
| 2001 | 16.5% | 64% |
| 2000 | 15.8% | 63.6% |
| 1999 | 14.7% | 63.3% |
| 1998 | 13.3% | 62.9% |
| 1997 | 11.8% | 62.5% |
| 1996 | 10.3% | 62.1% |
| 1995 | 8.82% | 61.6% |
| 1994 | 7.48% | 61.1% |
| 1993 | 6.4% | 60.6% |
| 1992 | 5.66% | 59.8% |
| 1991 | 5.36% | 59% |
| 1990 | 5.27% | 58.1% |
| 1989 | 5.2% | 57.1% |
| 1988 | 5.14% | 56.1% |
| 1987 | 5.09% | 55.2% |
| 1986 | 5.05% | 54.3% |
| 1985 | 5.01% | 53.6% |
| 1984 | 4.98% | 53% |
| 1983 | 4.95% | 52.5% |
| 1982 | 4.91% | 52.1% |
| 1981 | 4.87% | 51.8% |
| 1980 | 4.82% | 51.6% |
| 1979 | 4.75% | 51.3% |
| 1978 | 4.67% | 51% |
| 1977 | 4.55% | 50.7% |
| 1976 | 4.39% | 50.4% |
| 1975 | 4.19% | 49.9% |
| 1974 | 3.97% | 49.3% |
| 1973 | 3.75% | 48.4% |
| 1972 | 3.55% | 47.2% |
| 1971 | 3.37% | 46% |
| 1970 | 3.24% | 44.7% |
| 1969 | 3.14% | 43.3% |
| 1968 | 3.06% | 42.1% |
| 1967 | 3% | 41.1% |
| 1966 | 2.94% | 40.3% |
| 1965 | 2.88% | 39.6% |
| 1964 | 2.83% | 39.1% |
| 1963 | 2.78% | 38.6% |
| 1962 | 2.72% | 38.2% |
| 1961 | 2.67% | 37.8% |
| 1960 | 2.6% | 37.5% |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/rwanda/tunisia | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 16.9% to 29.9% in Rwanda and from 64.9% to 70.4% in Tunisia.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/rwanda/tunisia | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2004–2024, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.