Malta has a population density of 4,649 people per square mile compared to 1,497 people in Rwanda. Malta has 5,922 sq ft of land per person vs 19,886 sq ft in Rwanda. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Malta and Rwanda are ranked 5th and 13th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Malta has 0.007% of the world's population and 0.0002% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.18% of the population and 0.02% of the land area for Rwanda, hence the population density in Malta is 210.6% higher than in Rwanda.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 4,649 ppl/mi² | 1,497 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 5/197 | 13/197 |
| Population |
583596
|
14826674
|
| Land area | 123.6 sq mi | 9,525 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 5,997 sq ft | 18,626 sq ft |
| Rural population | 4.99% | 81.9% |
| Urban population | 95% | 18.1% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 8.11% |
Malta vs Rwanda:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Malta increased by 43.1%, compared to a 61.7% growth in Rwanda.
In 2004, Malta ranked 4th for population density and is in 5th place now. Rwanda was 18th in 2004 and ranks 13th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 4,649 | 1,497 |
| 2023 | 4,474 | 1,465 |
| 2022 | 4,299 | 1,433 |
| 2021 | 4,194 | 1,402 |
| 2020 | 4,172 | 1,372 |
| 2019 | 4,079 | 1,341 |
| 2018 | 3,917 | 1,311 |
| 2017 | 3,781 | 1,281 |
| 2016 | 3,679 | 1,251 |
| 2015 | 3,595 | 1,222 |
| 2014 | 3,508 | 1,193 |
| 2013 | 3,438 | 1,165 |
| 2012 | 3,400 | 1,137 |
| 2011 | 3,369 | 1,110 |
| 2010 | 3,355 | 1,083 |
| 2009 | 3,338 | 1,056 |
| 2008 | 3,313 | 1,029 |
| 2007 | 3,292 | 1,003 |
| 2006 | 3,280 | 976 |
| 2005 | 3,269 | 951 |
| 2004 | 3,248 | 926 |
| 2003 | 3,226 | 901 |
| 2002 | 3,205 | 882 |
| 2001 | 3,181 | 870 |
| 2000 | 3,157 | 862 |
| 1999 | 3,137 | 855 |
| 1998 | 3,118 | 848 |
| 1997 | 3,098 | 814 |
| 1996 | 3,075 | 704 |
| 1995 | 3,055 | 596 |
| 1994 | 3,033 | 713 |
| 1993 | 3,005 | 838 |
| 1992 | 2,975 | 807 |
| 1991 | 2,945 | 790 |
| 1990 | 2,867 | 774 |
| 1989 | 2,839 | 754 |
| 1988 | 2,811 | 732 |
| 1987 | 2,788 | 709 |
| 1986 | 2,769 | 686 |
| 1985 | 2,723 | 663 |
| 1984 | 2,676 | 641 |
| 1983 | 2,675 | 620 |
| 1982 | 2,638 | 600 |
| 1981 | 2,582 | 580 |
| 1980 | 2,563 | 562 |
| 1979 | 2,536 | 545 |
| 1978 | 2,511 | 529 |
| 1977 | 2,485 | 513 |
| 1976 | 2,475 | 498 |
| 1975 | 2,462 | 484 |
| 1974 | 2,444 | 470 |
| 1973 | 2,446 | 456 |
| 1972 | 2,448 | 443 |
| 1971 | 2,450 | 430 |
| 1970 | 2,450 | 418 |
| 1969 | 2,463 | 405 |
| 1968 | 2,492 | 393 |
| 1967 | 2,522 | 381 |
| 1966 | 2,551 | 370 |
| 1965 | 2,580 | 359 |
| 1964 | 2,600 | 350 |
| 1963 | 2,611 | 342 |
| 1962 | 2,622 | 334 |
| 1961 | 2,632 | 326 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 95% | 18.1% |
| 2023 | 94.9% | 17.9% |
| 2022 | 94.9% | 17.7% |
| 2021 | 94.8% | 17.6% |
| 2020 | 94.7% | 17.4% |
| 2019 | 94.7% | 17.3% |
| 2018 | 94.6% | 17.2% |
| 2017 | 94.5% | 17.1% |
| 2016 | 94.5% | 17.1% |
| 2015 | 94.4% | 17% |
| 2014 | 94.3% | 17% |
| 2013 | 94.3% | 16.9% |
| 2012 | 94.2% | 16.9% |
| 2011 | 94.1% | 16.9% |
| 2010 | 94.1% | 16.9% |
| 2009 | 94% | 16.9% |
| 2008 | 93.9% | 16.9% |
| 2007 | 93.9% | 16.9% |
| 2006 | 93.8% | 16.9% |
| 2005 | 93.6% | 16.9% |
| 2004 | 93.4% | 16.9% |
| 2003 | 93.2% | 16.9% |
| 2002 | 92.9% | 16.8% |
| 2001 | 92.6% | 15.8% |
| 2000 | 92.4% | 14.9% |
| 1999 | 92.1% | 14.1% |
| 1998 | 91.8% | 13.2% |
| 1997 | 91.5% | 12.5% |
| 1996 | 91.2% | 11.4% |
| 1995 | 90.9% | 9.84% |
| 1994 | 90.8% | 8.49% |
| 1993 | 90.7% | 7.31% |
| 1992 | 90.6% | 6.29% |
| 1991 | 90.5% | 5.49% |
| 1990 | 90.4% | 5.42% |
| 1989 | 90.3% | 5.34% |
| 1988 | 90.1% | 5.27% |
| 1987 | 90% | 5.2% |
| 1986 | 89.9% | 5.13% |
| 1985 | 89.8% | 5.06% |
| 1984 | 89.8% | 4.99% |
| 1983 | 89.8% | 4.92% |
| 1982 | 89.8% | 4.85% |
| 1981 | 89.8% | 4.79% |
| 1980 | 89.8% | 4.72% |
| 1979 | 89.8% | 4.66% |
| 1978 | 89.8% | 4.57% |
| 1977 | 89.8% | 4.37% |
| 1976 | 89.8% | 4.18% |
| 1975 | 89.7% | 4% |
| 1974 | 89.7% | 3.82% |
| 1973 | 89.7% | 3.65% |
| 1972 | 89.7% | 3.49% |
| 1971 | 89.7% | 3.34% |
| 1970 | 89.7% | 3.19% |
| 1969 | 89.7% | 3.13% |
| 1968 | 89.7% | 3.07% |
| 1967 | 89.7% | 3% |
| 1966 | 89.8% | 2.94% |
| 1965 | 89.8% | 2.88% |
| 1964 | 89.9% | 2.82% |
| 1963 | 89.9% | 2.77% |
| 1962 | 90% | 2.71% |
| 1961 | 90.1% | 2.65% |
| 1960 | 90.1% | 2.6% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 93.4% to 95% in Malta and from 16.9% to 18.1% in Rwanda.
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons