Estonia has a population density of 83.2 people per square mile compared to 844 people in Pakistan. Estonia has 355,676 sq ft of land per person vs 37,780 sq ft in Pakistan. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Estonia and Pakistan are ranked 152nd and 29th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Estonia has 0.02% of the world's population and 0.03% of the land area of all countries, compared to 3.09% of the population and 0.52% of the land area for Pakistan, hence the population density in Estonia is 90.1% lower than in Pakistan.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 83.2 ppl/mi² | 844 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 152/197 | 29/197 |
| Population |
1355535
|
258497127
|
| Land area | 16,498 sq mi | 297,638 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 335,238 sq ft | 33,023 sq ft |
| Rural population | 30% | 61.6% |
| Urban population | 70% | 38.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 16.3% |
Estonia vs Pakistan:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Estonia decreased by 0.11%, compared to a 46.7% growth in Pakistan.
In 2004, Estonia ranked 141st for population density and is in 152nd place now. Pakistan was 38th in 2004 and ranks 29th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 83.2 | 844 |
| 2023 | 83.1 | 832 |
| 2022 | 81.8 | 819 |
| 2021 | 80.6 | 805 |
| 2020 | 80.5 | 790 |
| 2019 | 80.4 | 775 |
| 2018 | 80.1 | 762 |
| 2017 | 79.8 | 750 |
| 2016 | 78.4 | 740 |
| 2015 | 78.4 | 730 |
| 2014 | 78.3 | 720 |
| 2013 | 78.5 | 709 |
| 2012 | 80.8 | 698 |
| 2011 | 81.1 | 685 |
| 2010 | 81.4 | 669 |
| 2009 | 81.5 | 653 |
| 2008 | 81.7 | 637 |
| 2007 | 81.9 | 620 |
| 2006 | 82.3 | 604 |
| 2005 | 82.8 | 589 |
| 2004 | 83.3 | 575 |
| 2003 | 83.7 | 561 |
| 2002 | 84.3 | 548 |
| 2001 | 84.8 | 535 |
| 2000 | 85.4 | 520 |
| 1999 | 84.9 | 506 |
| 1998 | 84.7 | 492 |
| 1997 | 85.5 | 479 |
| 1996 | 86.5 | 466 |
| 1995 | 87.8 | 452 |
| 1994 | 89.4 | 439 |
| 1993 | 91.3 | 427 |
| 1992 | 93.7 | 415 |
| 1991 | - | 403 |
| 1990 | - | 390 |
| 1989 | - | 377 |
| 1988 | - | 365 |
| 1987 | - | 353 |
| 1986 | - | 341 |
| 1985 | - | 330 |
| 1984 | - | 320 |
| 1983 | - | 310 |
| 1982 | - | 299.3 |
| 1981 | - | 288.3 |
| 1980 | - | 276.5 |
| 1979 | - | 265.4 |
| 1978 | - | 256.4 |
| 1977 | - | 248.3 |
| 1976 | - | 240.6 |
| 1975 | - | 233.4 |
| 1974 | - | 226.5 |
| 1973 | - | 219.9 |
| 1972 | - | 213.6 |
| 1971 | - | 207.8 |
| 1970 | - | 202.1 |
| 1969 | - | 196.4 |
| 1968 | - | 190.9 |
| 1967 | - | 185.5 |
| 1966 | - | 180.3 |
| 1965 | - | 175.4 |
| 1964 | - | 170.7 |
| 1963 | - | 166.1 |
| 1962 | - | 161.8 |
| 1961 | - | 157.6 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 70% | 38.4% |
| 2023 | 69.8% | 38% |
| 2022 | 69.6% | 37.7% |
| 2021 | 69.4% | 37.4% |
| 2020 | 69.2% | 37.2% |
| 2019 | 69.1% | 36.9% |
| 2018 | 68.9% | 36.7% |
| 2017 | 68.7% | 36.4% |
| 2016 | 68.6% | 36.2% |
| 2015 | 68.4% | 36% |
| 2014 | 68.3% | 35.8% |
| 2013 | 68.1% | 35.6% |
| 2012 | 68% | 35.4% |
| 2011 | 68% | 35.2% |
| 2010 | 68.1% | 35% |
| 2009 | 68.2% | 34.8% |
| 2008 | 68.4% | 34.6% |
| 2007 | 68.5% | 34.4% |
| 2006 | 68.6% | 34.2% |
| 2005 | 68.7% | 34% |
| 2004 | 68.9% | 33.8% |
| 2003 | 69% | 33.6% |
| 2002 | 69.1% | 33.4% |
| 2001 | 69.2% | 33.2% |
| 2000 | 69.4% | 33% |
| 1999 | 69.5% | 32.8% |
| 1998 | 69.7% | 32.6% |
| 1997 | 69.9% | 32.3% |
| 1996 | 70.1% | 32.1% |
| 1995 | 70.3% | 31.8% |
| 1994 | 70.5% | 31.6% |
| 1993 | 70.7% | 31.3% |
| 1992 | 70.9% | 31.1% |
| 1991 | 71% | 30.8% |
| 1990 | 71.2% | 30.6% |
| 1989 | 71.4% | 30.3% |
| 1988 | 71.4% | 30.1% |
| 1987 | 71.2% | 29.8% |
| 1986 | 71% | 29.6% |
| 1985 | 70.8% | 29.3% |
| 1984 | 70.6% | 29.1% |
| 1983 | 70.3% | 28.9% |
| 1982 | 70.1% | 28.6% |
| 1981 | 69.9% | 28.4% |
| 1980 | 69.7% | 28.1% |
| 1979 | 69.5% | 27.7% |
| 1978 | 69.1% | 27.4% |
| 1977 | 68.6% | 27% |
| 1976 | 68.1% | 26.7% |
| 1975 | 67.6% | 26.3% |
| 1974 | 67.1% | 26% |
| 1973 | 66.5% | 25.7% |
| 1972 | 66% | 25.4% |
| 1971 | 65.5% | 25.1% |
| 1970 | 64.9% | 24.8% |
| 1969 | 64.3% | 24.6% |
| 1968 | 63.6% | 24.3% |
| 1967 | 62.8% | 24% |
| 1966 | 62.1% | 23.8% |
| 1965 | 61.3% | 23.5% |
| 1964 | 60.6% | 23.3% |
| 1963 | 59.8% | 23% |
| 1962 | 59.1% | 22.8% |
| 1961 | 58.3% | 22.5% |
| 1960 | 57.5% | 22.1% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 68.9% to 70% in Estonia and from 33.8% to 38.4% in Pakistan.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Karachi | 14.9M |
| Lahore | 11.1M |
| Faisalabad | 3.2M |
| Rawalpindi | 2.1M |
| Gujranwala | 2.03M |
| Peshawar | 1.97M |
| Multan | 1.87M |
| Hyderabad | 1.73M |
| Islamabad | 1.01M |
| Quetta | 1M |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons