Estonia has a population density of 83.2 people per square mile compared to 203.1 people in Samoa. Estonia has 355,676 sq ft of land per person vs 140,314 sq ft in Samoa. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Estonia and Samoa are ranked 152nd and 109th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Estonia has 0.02% of the world's population and 0.03% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.003% of the population and 0.002% of the land area for Samoa, hence the population density in Estonia is 59.1% lower than in Samoa.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 83.2 ppl/mi² | 203.1 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 152/197 | 109/197 |
| Population |
1355535
|
220288
|
| Land area | 16,498 sq mi | 1,073 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 335,238 sq ft | 137,253 sq ft |
| Rural population | 30% | 82.6% |
| Urban population | 70% | 17.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Estonia vs Samoa:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Estonia decreased by 0.11%, compared to a 19.2% growth in Samoa.
In 2004, Estonia ranked 141st for population density and is in 152nd place now. Samoa was 104th in 2004 and ranks 109th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 83.2 | 203.1 |
| 2023 | 83.1 | 201.9 |
| 2022 | 81.8 | 200.5 |
| 2021 | 80.6 | 199.2 |
| 2020 | 80.5 | 197.5 |
| 2019 | 80.4 | 195.4 |
| 2018 | 80.1 | 193.4 |
| 2017 | 79.8 | 191.4 |
| 2016 | 78.4 | 186.2 |
| 2015 | 78.4 | 184.7 |
| 2014 | 78.3 | 183.1 |
| 2013 | 78.5 | 181.5 |
| 2012 | 80.8 | 179.8 |
| 2011 | 81.1 | 178.2 |
| 2010 | 81.4 | 176.7 |
| 2009 | 81.5 | 175.3 |
| 2008 | 81.7 | 174 |
| 2007 | 81.9 | 172.7 |
| 2006 | 82.3 | 171.8 |
| 2005 | 82.8 | 171.1 |
| 2004 | 83.3 | 170.5 |
| 2003 | 83.7 | 169.7 |
| 2002 | 84.3 | 168.8 |
| 2001 | 84.8 | 167.6 |
| 2000 | 85.4 | 166.3 |
| 1999 | 84.9 | 165 |
| 1998 | 84.7 | 163.7 |
| 1997 | 85.5 | 162.5 |
| 1996 | 86.5 | 161.1 |
| 1995 | 87.8 | 159.8 |
| 1994 | 89.4 | 158.5 |
| 1993 | 91.3 | 157.2 |
| 1992 | 93.7 | 155.9 |
| 1991 | - | 155 |
| 1990 | - | 154.7 |
| 1989 | - | 154.5 |
| 1988 | - | 154.1 |
| 1987 | - | 153.4 |
| 1986 | - | 152.9 |
| 1985 | - | 152.7 |
| 1984 | - | 152.7 |
| 1983 | - | 152.6 |
| 1982 | - | 152.4 |
| 1981 | - | 151.6 |
| 1980 | - | 150.4 |
| 1979 | - | 149.1 |
| 1978 | - | 147.7 |
| 1977 | - | 146.2 |
| 1976 | - | 143.8 |
| 1975 | - | 140.3 |
| 1974 | - | 136.8 |
| 1973 | - | 134.1 |
| 1972 | - | 132.3 |
| 1971 | - | 130.4 |
| 1970 | - | 128.5 |
| 1969 | - | 126.5 |
| 1968 | - | 124.5 |
| 1967 | - | 122.4 |
| 1966 | - | 120 |
| 1965 | - | 117.1 |
| 1964 | - | 114.3 |
| 1963 | - | 111.4 |
| 1962 | - | 108.5 |
| 1961 | - | 105.7 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 70% | 17.4% |
| 2023 | 69.8% | 17.5% |
| 2022 | 69.6% | 17.6% |
| 2021 | 69.4% | 17.7% |
| 2020 | 69.2% | 17.9% |
| 2019 | 69.1% | 18.1% |
| 2018 | 68.9% | 18.2% |
| 2017 | 68.7% | 18.5% |
| 2016 | 68.6% | 18.7% |
| 2015 | 68.4% | 18.9% |
| 2014 | 68.3% | 19.1% |
| 2013 | 68.1% | 19.4% |
| 2012 | 68% | 19.6% |
| 2011 | 68% | 19.9% |
| 2010 | 68.1% | 20.1% |
| 2009 | 68.2% | 20.3% |
| 2008 | 68.4% | 20.5% |
| 2007 | 68.5% | 20.7% |
| 2006 | 68.6% | 21% |
| 2005 | 68.7% | 21.2% |
| 2004 | 68.9% | 21.5% |
| 2003 | 69% | 21.7% |
| 2002 | 69.1% | 21.9% |
| 2001 | 69.2% | 22.1% |
| 2000 | 69.4% | 22% |
| 1999 | 69.5% | 21.9% |
| 1998 | 69.7% | 21.8% |
| 1997 | 69.9% | 21.7% |
| 1996 | 70.1% | 21.6% |
| 1995 | 70.3% | 21.5% |
| 1994 | 70.5% | 21.4% |
| 1993 | 70.7% | 21.3% |
| 1992 | 70.9% | 21.3% |
| 1991 | 71% | 21.2% |
| 1990 | 71.2% | 21.2% |
| 1989 | 71.4% | 21.2% |
| 1988 | 71.4% | 21.2% |
| 1987 | 71.2% | 21.2% |
| 1986 | 71% | 21.2% |
| 1985 | 70.8% | 21.2% |
| 1984 | 70.6% | 21.2% |
| 1983 | 70.3% | 21.2% |
| 1982 | 70.1% | 21.2% |
| 1981 | 69.9% | 21.2% |
| 1980 | 69.7% | 21.2% |
| 1979 | 69.5% | 21.2% |
| 1978 | 69.1% | 21.1% |
| 1977 | 68.6% | 21.1% |
| 1976 | 68.1% | 21.1% |
| 1975 | 67.6% | 21% |
| 1974 | 67.1% | 20.9% |
| 1973 | 66.5% | 20.8% |
| 1972 | 66% | 20.8% |
| 1971 | 65.5% | 20.6% |
| 1970 | 64.9% | 20.4% |
| 1969 | 64.3% | 20.1% |
| 1968 | 63.6% | 19.8% |
| 1967 | 62.8% | 19.6% |
| 1966 | 62.1% | 19.4% |
| 1965 | 61.3% | 19.3% |
| 1964 | 60.6% | 19.2% |
| 1963 | 59.8% | 19.1% |
| 1962 | 59.1% | 19.1% |
| 1961 | 58.3% | 19% |
| 1960 | 57.5% | 18.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 68.9% to 70% in Estonia and from 21.5% to 17.4% in Samoa.
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons