Estonia has a population density of 83.2 people per square mile compared to 148.9 people in Nicaragua. Estonia has 355,676 sq ft of land per person vs 187,291 sq ft in Nicaragua. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Estonia and Nicaragua are ranked 152nd and 132nd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Estonia has 0.02% of the world's population and 0.03% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.08% of the population and 0.08% of the land area for Nicaragua, hence the population density in Estonia is 44.1% lower than in Nicaragua.
Population density comparison
Estonia
|
Nicaragua
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 83.2 ppl/mi² | 148.9 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 152/197 | 132/197 |
| Population |
1355535
|
7079664
|
| Land area | 16,498 sq mi | 46,464 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 335,238 sq ft | 187,291 sq ft |
| Rural population | 30% | 39.8% |
| Urban population | 70% | 60.2% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Estonia vs Nicaragua:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Estonia decreased by 0.11%, compared to a 31.2% growth in Nicaragua.
In 2004, Estonia ranked 141st for population density and is in 152nd place now. Nicaragua was 126th in 2004 and ranks 132nd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Estonia
|
Nicaragua
|
|
| 2024 | 83.2 | 148.9 |
| 2023 | 83.1 | 146.9 |
| 2022 | 81.8 | 144.9 |
| 2021 | 80.6 | 143 |
| 2020 | 80.5 | 141.3 |
| 2019 | 80.4 | 139.5 |
| 2018 | 80.1 | 137.7 |
| 2017 | 79.8 | 135.9 |
| 2016 | 78.4 | 134.1 |
| 2015 | 78.4 | 132.3 |
| 2014 | 78.3 | 130.6 |
| 2013 | 78.5 | 128.8 |
| 2012 | 80.8 | 127 |
| 2011 | 81.1 | 125.2 |
| 2010 | 81.4 | 123.5 |
| 2009 | 81.5 | 121.7 |
| 2008 | 81.7 | 120 |
| 2007 | 81.9 | 118.3 |
| 2006 | 82.3 | 116.6 |
| 2005 | 82.8 | 115 |
| 2004 | 83.3 | 113.5 |
| 2003 | 83.7 | 112.2 |
| 2002 | 84.3 | 110.8 |
| 2001 | 84.8 | 109.5 |
| 2000 | 85.4 | 108.1 |
| 1999 | 84.9 | 106.6 |
| 1998 | 84.7 | 105.1 |
| 1997 | 85.5 | 103.5 |
| 1996 | 86.5 | 101.8 |
| 1995 | 87.8 | 99.9 |
| 1994 | 89.4 | 97.9 |
| 1993 | 91.3 | 95.9 |
| 1992 | 93.7 | 93.8 |
| 1991 | - | 91.7 |
| 1990 | - | 89.6 |
| 1989 | - | 87.5 |
| 1988 | - | 85.5 |
| 1987 | - | 83.6 |
| 1986 | - | 81.7 |
| 1985 | - | 79.8 |
| 1984 | - | 77.9 |
| 1983 | - | 76 |
| 1982 | - | 74 |
| 1981 | - | 72 |
| 1980 | - | 70 |
| 1979 | - | 68.1 |
| 1978 | - | 66.3 |
| 1977 | - | 64.4 |
| 1976 | - | 62.5 |
| 1975 | - | 60.6 |
| 1974 | - | 58.8 |
| 1973 | - | 57 |
| 1972 | - | 55.4 |
| 1971 | - | 53.8 |
| 1970 | - | 52.1 |
| 1969 | - | 50.5 |
| 1968 | - | 49 |
| 1967 | - | 47.5 |
| 1966 | - | 46 |
| 1965 | - | 44.6 |
| 1964 | - | 43.3 |
| 1963 | - | 42 |
| 1962 | - | 40.7 |
| 1961 | - | 39.5 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Estonia
|
Nicaragua
|
|
| 2024 | 70% | 60.2% |
| 2023 | 69.8% | 59.8% |
| 2022 | 69.6% | 59.6% |
| 2021 | 69.4% | 59.3% |
| 2020 | 69.2% | 59% |
| 2019 | 69.1% | 58.8% |
| 2018 | 68.9% | 58.5% |
| 2017 | 68.7% | 58.3% |
| 2016 | 68.6% | 58.1% |
| 2015 | 68.4% | 57.9% |
| 2014 | 68.3% | 57.7% |
| 2013 | 68.1% | 57.5% |
| 2012 | 68% | 57.3% |
| 2011 | 68% | 57.1% |
| 2010 | 68.1% | 56.9% |
| 2009 | 68.2% | 56.7% |
| 2008 | 68.4% | 56.5% |
| 2007 | 68.5% | 56.3% |
| 2006 | 68.6% | 56.1% |
| 2005 | 68.7% | 55.9% |
| 2004 | 68.9% | 55.8% |
| 2003 | 69% | 55.6% |
| 2002 | 69.1% | 55.5% |
| 2001 | 69.2% | 55.3% |
| 2000 | 69.4% | 55.2% |
| 1999 | 69.5% | 55% |
| 1998 | 69.7% | 54.9% |
| 1997 | 69.9% | 54.7% |
| 1996 | 70.1% | 54.6% |
| 1995 | 70.3% | 54.4% |
| 1994 | 70.5% | 54.2% |
| 1993 | 70.7% | 53.9% |
| 1992 | 70.9% | 53.6% |
| 1991 | 71% | 53.4% |
| 1990 | 71.2% | 53.1% |
| 1989 | 71.4% | 52.8% |
| 1988 | 71.4% | 52.5% |
| 1987 | 71.2% | 52.2% |
| 1986 | 71% | 52% |
| 1985 | 70.8% | 51.7% |
| 1984 | 70.6% | 51.4% |
| 1983 | 70.3% | 51.1% |
| 1982 | 70.1% | 50.8% |
| 1981 | 69.9% | 50.6% |
| 1980 | 69.7% | 50.3% |
| 1979 | 69.5% | 50% |
| 1978 | 69.1% | 49.7% |
| 1977 | 68.6% | 49.5% |
| 1976 | 68.1% | 49.2% |
| 1975 | 67.6% | 48.9% |
| 1974 | 67.1% | 48.6% |
| 1973 | 66.5% | 48.3% |
| 1972 | 66% | 48.1% |
| 1971 | 65.5% | 47.8% |
| 1970 | 64.9% | 47% |
| 1969 | 64.3% | 46.2% |
| 1968 | 63.6% | 45.3% |
| 1967 | 62.8% | 44.4% |
| 1966 | 62.1% | 43.6% |
| 1965 | 61.3% | 42.7% |
| 1964 | 60.6% | 41.9% |
| 1963 | 59.8% | 41% |
| 1962 | 59.1% | 40.5% |
| 1961 | 58.3% | 40% |
| 1960 | 57.5% | 39.6% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 68.9% to 70% in Estonia and from 55.8% to 60.2% in Nicaragua.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
