Antigua and Barbuda has a population density of 557 people per square mile compared to 81.2 people in Estonia. Antigua and Barbuda has 50,540 sq ft of land per person vs 355,584 sq ft in Estonia. Antigua and Barbuda and Estonia rank 53rd and 154th by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Antigua and Barbuda has 0.001% of the world's population and 0.0003% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.02% of the population and 0.03% of the land area for Estonia, making the population density in Antigua and Barbuda 586% higher than in Estonia.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
Antigua
|
Estonia
|
|
| 2026 | 557 | 81.2 |
| 2025 | 555 | 82.4 |
| 2024 | 552 | 83.2 |
| 2023 | 549 | 83.1 |
| 2022 | 546 | 81.8 |
| 2021 | 544 | 80.6 |
| 2020 | 541 | 80.5 |
| 2019 | 538 | 80.4 |
| 2018 | 535 | 80.1 |
| 2017 | 533 | 79.8 |
| 2016 | 530 | 78.4 |
| 2015 | 526 | 78.4 |
| 2014 | 523 | 78.3 |
| 2013 | 518 | 78.5 |
| 2012 | 514 | 80.8 |
| 2011 | 508 | 81.1 |
| 2010 | 502 | 81.4 |
| 2009 | 495 | 81.5 |
| 2008 | 488 | 81.7 |
| 2007 | 481 | 81.9 |
| 2006 | 474 | 82.3 |
| 2005 | 469 | 82.8 |
| 2004 | 463 | 83.3 |
| 2003 | 458 | 83.7 |
| 2002 | 453 | 84.3 |
| 2001 | 448 | 84.8 |
| 2000 | 441 | 85.4 |
| 1999 | 434 | 84.9 |
| 1998 | 426 | 84.7 |
| 1997 | 418 | 85.5 |
| 1996 | 410 | 86.5 |
| 1995 | 401 | 87.8 |
| 1994 | 393 | 89.4 |
| 1993 | 386 | 91.3 |
| 1992 | 379 | 93.7 |
| 1991 | 373 | - |
| 1990 | 371 | - |
| 1989 | 373 | - |
| 1988 | 375 | - |
| 1987 | 376 | - |
| 1986 | 378 | - |
| 1985 | 380 | - |
| 1984 | 382 | - |
| 1983 | 382 | - |
| 1982 | 381 | - |
| 1981 | 381 | - |
| 1980 | 380 | - |
| 1979 | 378 | - |
| 1978 | 377 | - |
| 1977 | 376 | - |
| 1976 | 375 | - |
| 1975 | 376 | - |
| 1974 | 377 | - |
| 1973 | 379 | - |
| 1972 | 380 | - |
| 1971 | 381 | - |
| 1970 | 380 | - |
| 1969 | 376 | - |
| 1968 | 370 | - |
| 1967 | 364 | - |
| 1966 | 358 | - |
| 1965 | 353 | - |
| 1964 | 347 | - |
| 1963 | 342 | - |
| 1962 | 337 | - |
| 1961 | 333 | - |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (2025–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/antigua-and-barbuda/estonia | CC BY 
From 2006 to 2026, population density in Antigua and Barbuda increased by 17.4%, compared to a 1.33% decline in Estonia.
In 2006, Antigua and Barbuda ranked 48th by population density and is 53rd now. Estonia was 147th in 2006 and ranks 154th out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
Antigua
|
Estonia
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 557 ppl/mi² | 81.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 53/197 | 154/197 |
| Population |
94757
|
1339590
|
| Land area | 169.9 sq mi | 16,498 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 50,507 sq ft | 335,151 sq ft |
| Rural population | 75.6% | 29.3% |
| Urban population | 24.4% | 70.7% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Antigua
|
Estonia
|
|
| 2024 | 24.4% | 70.7% |
| 2023 | 24.5% | 70.7% |
| 2022 | 24.5% | 70.5% |
| 2021 | 24.6% | 70.2% |
| 2020 | 24.6% | 69.9% |
| 2019 | 24.7% | 69.6% |
| 2018 | 24.8% | 69.3% |
| 2017 | 24.8% | 69% |
| 2016 | 24.9% | 68.7% |
| 2015 | 25% | 68.5% |
| 2014 | 25.1% | 68.3% |
| 2013 | 25.2% | 68.1% |
| 2012 | 25.5% | 68% |
| 2011 | 25.7% | 67.9% |
| 2010 | 26% | 67.8% |
| 2009 | 26.5% | 67.7% |
| 2008 | 27.1% | 67.7% |
| 2007 | 27.7% | 67.6% |
| 2006 | 28.4% | 67.6% |
| 2005 | 29.2% | 67.5% |
| 2004 | 29.9% | 67.5% |
| 2003 | 30.6% | 67.4% |
| 2002 | 31.2% | 67.4% |
| 2001 | 31.8% | 67.4% |
| 2000 | 32.2% | 67.4% |
| 1999 | 32.7% | 67.4% |
| 1998 | 33.2% | 67.7% |
| 1997 | 33.7% | 68% |
| 1996 | 34.2% | 68.4% |
| 1995 | 34.6% | 69% |
| 1994 | 35% | 69.5% |
| 1993 | 35.2% | 70% |
| 1992 | 35.4% | 70.5% |
| 1991 | 35.5% | 71% |
| 1990 | 35.5% | 71.3% |
| 1989 | 35.5% | 71.4% |
| 1988 | 35.4% | 71.4% |
| 1987 | 35.3% | 71.3% |
| 1986 | 35.2% | 71.2% |
| 1985 | 35.2% | 71.1% |
| 1984 | 35% | 71% |
| 1983 | 34.9% | 70.8% |
| 1982 | 34.8% | 70.6% |
| 1981 | 34.7% | 70.3% |
| 1980 | 34.5% | 70% |
| 1979 | 34.4% | 69.6% |
| 1978 | 34.3% | 69.2% |
| 1977 | 34.2% | 68.7% |
| 1976 | 34.1% | 68.2% |
| 1975 | 33.9% | 67.7% |
| 1974 | 33.9% | 67.2% |
| 1973 | 33.8% | 66.7% |
| 1972 | 33.7% | 66.1% |
| 1971 | 33.7% | 65.5% |
| 1970 | 33.7% | 65.2% |
| 1969 | 33.8% | 64.6% |
| 1968 | 34.2% | 64.2% |
| 1967 | 34.8% | 63.6% |
| 1966 | 35.6% | 63.1% |
| 1965 | 36.4% | 62.5% |
| 1964 | 37.3% | 61.7% |
| 1963 | 38.1% | 61% |
| 1962 | 38.8% | 60.1% |
| 1961 | 39.3% | 58.8% |
| 1960 | 39.6% | 57.6% |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/antigua-and-barbuda/estonia | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 29.9% to 24.4% in Antigua and Barbuda and from 67.5% to 70.7% in Estonia.
Densely populated cities
|
Estonia
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Tallinn | 458K |
| Tartu | 97.8K |
| Narva | 53.4K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/antigua-and-barbuda/estonia | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2024, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.