Estonia has a population density of 81.2 people per square mile compared to 157.4 people in Liberia. Estonia has 355,584 sq ft of land per person vs 213,577 sq ft in Liberia. Estonia and Liberia rank 154th and 130th by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Estonia has 0.02% of the world's population and 0.03% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.07% of the population and 0.06% of the land area for Liberia, making the population density in Estonia 48.4% lower than in Liberia.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
Estonia
|
Liberia
|
|
| 2026 | 81.2 | 157.4 |
| 2025 | 82.4 | 154.2 |
| 2024 | 83.2 | 150.9 |
| 2023 | 83.1 | 147.7 |
| 2022 | 81.8 | 144.5 |
| 2021 | 80.6 | 141.4 |
| 2020 | 80.5 | 138.5 |
| 2019 | 80.4 | 135.6 |
| 2018 | 80.1 | 133 |
| 2017 | 79.8 | 130.4 |
| 2016 | 78.4 | 127.9 |
| 2015 | 78.4 | 125.3 |
| 2014 | 78.3 | 122.7 |
| 2013 | 78.5 | 120.2 |
| 2012 | 80.8 | 117.6 |
| 2011 | 81.1 | 113.5 |
| 2010 | 81.4 | 109.1 |
| 2009 | 81.5 | 106 |
| 2008 | 81.7 | 102.7 |
| 2007 | 81.9 | 98.7 |
| 2006 | 82.3 | 93.9 |
| 2005 | 82.8 | 88.8 |
| 2004 | 83.3 | 84.9 |
| 2003 | 83.7 | 83.9 |
| 2002 | 84.3 | 83.2 |
| 2001 | 84.8 | 81.1 |
| 2000 | 85.4 | 78.7 |
| 1999 | 84.9 | 75.9 |
| 1998 | 84.7 | 71.8 |
| 1997 | 85.5 | 64.9 |
| 1996 | 86.5 | 60 |
| 1995 | 87.8 | 58.3 |
| 1994 | 89.4 | 57.8 |
| 1993 | 91.3 | 58 |
| 1992 | 93.7 | 55.7 |
| 1991 | - | 52.6 |
| 1990 | - | 59.8 |
| 1989 | - | 67.7 |
| 1988 | - | 65.8 |
| 1987 | - | 63.9 |
| 1986 | - | 62.1 |
| 1985 | - | 60.2 |
| 1984 | - | 58.4 |
| 1983 | - | 56.7 |
| 1982 | - | 55 |
| 1981 | - | 53.4 |
| 1980 | - | 51.9 |
| 1979 | - | 50.4 |
| 1978 | - | 48.9 |
| 1977 | - | 47.5 |
| 1976 | - | 46.2 |
| 1975 | - | 44.9 |
| 1974 | - | 43.7 |
| 1973 | - | 42.6 |
| 1972 | - | 41.5 |
| 1971 | - | 40.4 |
| 1970 | - | 39.4 |
| 1969 | - | 38.4 |
| 1968 | - | 37.5 |
| 1967 | - | 36.5 |
| 1966 | - | 35.6 |
| 1965 | - | 34.7 |
| 1964 | - | 33.8 |
| 1963 | - | 33 |
| 1962 | - | 32.2 |
| 1961 | - | 31.4 |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (2025–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/estonia/liberia | CC BY 
From 2006 to 2026, population density in Estonia decreased by 1.33%, compared to a 67.6% growth in Liberia.
In 2006, Estonia ranked 147th by population density and is 154th now. Liberia was 140th in 2006 and ranks 130th out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
Estonia
|
Liberia
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 81.2 ppl/mi² | 157.4 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 154/197 | 130/197 |
| Population |
1339590
|
5887000
|
| Land area | 16,498 sq mi | 37,189 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 335,151 sq ft | 184,716 sq ft |
| Rural population | 29.3% | 44.5% |
| Urban population | 70.7% | 55.5% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 17.4% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Estonia
|
Liberia
|
|
| 2024 | 70.7% | 55.5% |
| 2023 | 70.7% | 55% |
| 2022 | 70.5% | 54.5% |
| 2021 | 70.2% | 53.9% |
| 2020 | 69.9% | 53.4% |
| 2019 | 69.6% | 52.9% |
| 2018 | 69.3% | 52.3% |
| 2017 | 69% | 51.8% |
| 2016 | 68.7% | 51.3% |
| 2015 | 68.5% | 50.7% |
| 2014 | 68.3% | 50.2% |
| 2013 | 68.1% | 49.7% |
| 2012 | 68% | 49.2% |
| 2011 | 67.9% | 48.7% |
| 2010 | 67.8% | 48.1% |
| 2009 | 67.7% | 47.6% |
| 2008 | 67.7% | 47.1% |
| 2007 | 67.6% | 46.6% |
| 2006 | 67.6% | 46.2% |
| 2005 | 67.5% | 45.9% |
| 2004 | 67.5% | 45.4% |
| 2003 | 67.4% | 45% |
| 2002 | 67.4% | 44.6% |
| 2001 | 67.4% | 44.2% |
| 2000 | 67.4% | 43.8% |
| 1999 | 67.4% | 43.4% |
| 1998 | 67.7% | 43.2% |
| 1997 | 68% | 43% |
| 1996 | 68.4% | 43% |
| 1995 | 69% | 44.5% |
| 1994 | 69.5% | 48.3% |
| 1993 | 70% | 52.7% |
| 1992 | 70.5% | 56.4% |
| 1991 | 71% | 58% |
| 1990 | 71.3% | 43.3% |
| 1989 | 71.4% | 41.9% |
| 1988 | 71.4% | 41.3% |
| 1987 | 71.3% | 40.7% |
| 1986 | 71.2% | 36.7% |
| 1985 | 71.1% | 39.5% |
| 1984 | 71% | 39.1% |
| 1983 | 70.8% | 38.5% |
| 1982 | 70.6% | 37.7% |
| 1981 | 70.3% | 36.8% |
| 1980 | 70% | 35.8% |
| 1979 | 69.6% | 34.8% |
| 1978 | 69.2% | 33.7% |
| 1977 | 68.7% | 32.6% |
| 1976 | 68.2% | 31.5% |
| 1975 | 67.7% | 30.5% |
| 1974 | 67.2% | 29.5% |
| 1973 | 66.7% | 28.6% |
| 1972 | 66.1% | 27.8% |
| 1971 | 65.5% | 26.9% |
| 1970 | 65.2% | 26.1% |
| 1969 | 64.6% | 25.3% |
| 1968 | 64.2% | 24.5% |
| 1967 | 63.6% | 23.7% |
| 1966 | 63.1% | 22.9% |
| 1965 | 62.5% | 22.1% |
| 1964 | 61.7% | 21.4% |
| 1963 | 61% | 20.6% |
| 1962 | 60.1% | 19.9% |
| 1961 | 58.8% | 19.2% |
| 1960 | 57.6% | 18.6% |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/estonia/liberia | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 67.5% to 70.7% in Estonia and from 45.4% to 55.5% in Liberia.
Densely populated cities
|
Estonia
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Tallinn | 458K |
| Tartu | 97.8K |
| Narva | 53.4K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/estonia/liberia | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2024, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.