Estonia has a population density of 83.2 people per square mile compared to 250.6 people in Honduras. Estonia has 355,676 sq ft of land per person vs 111,850 sq ft in Honduras. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Estonia and Honduras are ranked 152nd and 97th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Estonia has 0.02% of the world's population and 0.03% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.13% of the population and 0.08% of the land area for Honduras, hence the population density in Estonia is 66.8% lower than in Honduras.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 83.2 ppl/mi² | 250.6 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 152/197 | 97/197 |
| Population |
1355535
|
11149564
|
| Land area | 16,498 sq mi | 43,201 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 335,238 sq ft | 111,251 sq ft |
| Rural population | 30% | 39.2% |
| Urban population | 70% | 60.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 9.75% |
Estonia vs Honduras:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Estonia decreased by 0.11%, compared to a 48.3% growth in Honduras.
In 2004, Estonia ranked 141st for population density and is in 152nd place now. Honduras was 106th in 2004 and ranks 97th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 83.2 | 250.6 |
| 2023 | 83.1 | 246.4 |
| 2022 | 81.8 | 242.2 |
| 2021 | 80.6 | 238.2 |
| 2020 | 80.5 | 234.2 |
| 2019 | 80.4 | 230.2 |
| 2018 | 80.1 | 226 |
| 2017 | 79.8 | 221.9 |
| 2016 | 78.4 | 217.9 |
| 2015 | 78.4 | 213.8 |
| 2014 | 78.3 | 209.8 |
| 2013 | 78.5 | 205.8 |
| 2012 | 80.8 | 201.7 |
| 2011 | 81.1 | 197.7 |
| 2010 | 81.4 | 193.7 |
| 2009 | 81.5 | 189.6 |
| 2008 | 81.7 | 185.5 |
| 2007 | 81.9 | 181.4 |
| 2006 | 82.3 | 177.2 |
| 2005 | 82.8 | 173.1 |
| 2004 | 83.3 | 169 |
| 2003 | 83.7 | 164.8 |
| 2002 | 84.3 | 160.6 |
| 2001 | 84.8 | 156.4 |
| 2000 | 85.4 | 152.3 |
| 1999 | 84.9 | 148.2 |
| 1998 | 84.7 | 144.3 |
| 1997 | 85.5 | 140.5 |
| 1996 | 86.5 | 136.7 |
| 1995 | 87.8 | 132.9 |
| 1994 | 89.4 | 129.1 |
| 1993 | 91.3 | 125.5 |
| 1992 | 93.7 | 122 |
| 1991 | - | 118.6 |
| 1990 | - | 115.3 |
| 1989 | - | 112.1 |
| 1988 | - | 109 |
| 1987 | - | 105.9 |
| 1986 | - | 103 |
| 1985 | - | 100.1 |
| 1984 | - | 97.2 |
| 1983 | - | 94.4 |
| 1982 | - | 91.6 |
| 1981 | - | 88.9 |
| 1980 | - | 86.3 |
| 1979 | - | 83.7 |
| 1978 | - | 81.1 |
| 1977 | - | 78.7 |
| 1976 | - | 76.3 |
| 1975 | - | 73.9 |
| 1974 | - | 71.8 |
| 1973 | - | 69.7 |
| 1972 | - | 67.6 |
| 1971 | - | 65.6 |
| 1970 | - | 63.7 |
| 1969 | - | 61.8 |
| 1968 | - | 60 |
| 1967 | - | 58.3 |
| 1966 | - | 56.6 |
| 1965 | - | 55 |
| 1964 | - | 53.5 |
| 1963 | - | 52 |
| 1962 | - | 50.5 |
| 1961 | - | 49.1 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 70% | 60.8% |
| 2023 | 69.8% | 60.2% |
| 2022 | 69.6% | 59.6% |
| 2021 | 69.4% | 59% |
| 2020 | 69.2% | 58.4% |
| 2019 | 69.1% | 57.7% |
| 2018 | 68.9% | 57.1% |
| 2017 | 68.7% | 56.5% |
| 2016 | 68.6% | 55.8% |
| 2015 | 68.4% | 55.2% |
| 2014 | 68.3% | 54.5% |
| 2013 | 68.1% | 53.9% |
| 2012 | 68% | 53.2% |
| 2011 | 68% | 52.5% |
| 2010 | 68.1% | 51.9% |
| 2009 | 68.2% | 51.2% |
| 2008 | 68.4% | 50.6% |
| 2007 | 68.5% | 49.9% |
| 2006 | 68.6% | 49.2% |
| 2005 | 68.7% | 48.6% |
| 2004 | 68.9% | 47.9% |
| 2003 | 69% | 47.3% |
| 2002 | 69.1% | 46.6% |
| 2001 | 69.2% | 46% |
| 2000 | 69.4% | 45.5% |
| 1999 | 69.5% | 45% |
| 1998 | 69.7% | 44.4% |
| 1997 | 69.9% | 43.9% |
| 1996 | 70.1% | 43.4% |
| 1995 | 70.3% | 42.9% |
| 1994 | 70.5% | 42.4% |
| 1993 | 70.7% | 41.9% |
| 1992 | 70.9% | 41.4% |
| 1991 | 71% | 41% |
| 1990 | 71.2% | 40.5% |
| 1989 | 71.4% | 40% |
| 1988 | 71.4% | 39.5% |
| 1987 | 71.2% | 38.9% |
| 1986 | 71% | 38.3% |
| 1985 | 70.8% | 37.7% |
| 1984 | 70.6% | 37.2% |
| 1983 | 70.3% | 36.6% |
| 1982 | 70.1% | 36% |
| 1981 | 69.9% | 35.4% |
| 1980 | 69.7% | 34.9% |
| 1979 | 69.5% | 34.3% |
| 1978 | 69.1% | 33.8% |
| 1977 | 68.6% | 33.2% |
| 1976 | 68.1% | 32.7% |
| 1975 | 67.6% | 32.1% |
| 1974 | 67.1% | 31.6% |
| 1973 | 66.5% | 30.9% |
| 1972 | 66% | 30.2% |
| 1971 | 65.5% | 29.6% |
| 1970 | 64.9% | 28.9% |
| 1969 | 64.3% | 28.2% |
| 1968 | 63.6% | 27.6% |
| 1967 | 62.8% | 27% |
| 1966 | 62.1% | 26.3% |
| 1965 | 61.3% | 25.7% |
| 1964 | 60.6% | 25.1% |
| 1963 | 59.8% | 24.5% |
| 1962 | 59.1% | 23.9% |
| 1961 | 58.3% | 23.3% |
| 1960 | 57.5% | 22.7% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 68.9% to 70% in Estonia and from 47.9% to 60.8% in Honduras.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Tegucigalpa | 1.06M |
| San Pedro Sula | 719K |
| Choloma | 232K |
| La Ceiba | 197K |
| El Progreso | 188K |
| Villanueva | 150K |
| Comayagua | 145K |
| Puerto Cortes | 122K |
| Yoro | 86.7K |
| La Lima | 71.9K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons