Estonia has a population density of 83.2 people per square mile compared to 52.5 people in New Zealand. Estonia has 355,676 sq ft of land per person vs 540,405 sq ft in New Zealand. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Estonia and New Zealand are ranked 152nd and 168th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Estonia has 0.02% of the world's population and 0.03% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.07% of the population and 0.18% of the land area for New Zealand, hence the population density in Estonia is 58.4% higher than in New Zealand.
Population density comparison
Estonia
|
New Zealand
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 83.2 ppl/mi² | 52.5 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 152/197 | 168/197 |
| Population |
1355535
|
5406623
|
| Land area | 16,498 sq mi | 101,665 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 335,238 sq ft | 530,907 sq ft |
| Rural population | 30% | 12.9% |
| Urban population | 70% | 87.1% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 27.5% |
Estonia vs New Zealand:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Estonia decreased by 0.11%, compared to a 30.6% growth in New Zealand.
In 2004, Estonia ranked 141st for population density and is in 152nd place now. New Zealand was 162nd in 2004 and ranks 168th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Estonia
|
New Zealand
|
|
| 2024 | 83.2 | 52.5 |
| 2023 | 83.1 | 51.6 |
| 2022 | 81.8 | 50.3 |
| 2021 | 80.6 | 50.3 |
| 2020 | 80.5 | 50.1 |
| 2019 | 80.4 | 49 |
| 2018 | 80.1 | 48.2 |
| 2017 | 79.8 | 47.3 |
| 2016 | 78.4 | 46.4 |
| 2015 | 78.4 | 45.3 |
| 2014 | 78.3 | 44.4 |
| 2013 | 78.5 | 43.7 |
| 2012 | 80.8 | 43.4 |
| 2011 | 81.1 | 43.1 |
| 2010 | 81.4 | 42.8 |
| 2009 | 81.5 | 42.3 |
| 2008 | 81.7 | 41.9 |
| 2007 | 81.9 | 41.5 |
| 2006 | 82.3 | 41.2 |
| 2005 | 82.8 | 40.7 |
| 2004 | 83.3 | 40.2 |
| 2003 | 83.7 | 39.6 |
| 2002 | 84.3 | 38.8 |
| 2001 | 84.8 | 38.2 |
| 2000 | 85.4 | 37.9 |
| 1999 | 84.9 | 37.7 |
| 1998 | 84.7 | 37.5 |
| 1997 | 85.5 | 37.2 |
| 1996 | 86.5 | 36.7 |
| 1995 | 87.8 | 36.1 |
| 1994 | 89.4 | 35.6 |
| 1993 | 91.3 | 35.1 |
| 1992 | 93.7 | 34.7 |
| 1991 | - | 34.4 |
| 1990 | - | 32.8 |
| 1989 | - | 32.5 |
| 1988 | - | 32.3 |
| 1987 | - | 32.2 |
| 1986 | - | 31.9 |
| 1985 | - | 31.9 |
| 1984 | - | 31.7 |
| 1983 | - | 31.5 |
| 1982 | - | 31 |
| 1981 | - | 30.7 |
| 1980 | - | 30.6 |
| 1979 | - | 30.6 |
| 1978 | - | 30.7 |
| 1977 | - | 30.7 |
| 1976 | - | 30.6 |
| 1975 | - | 30.3 |
| 1974 | - | 29.7 |
| 1973 | - | 29.1 |
| 1972 | - | 28.6 |
| 1971 | - | 28.1 |
| 1970 | - | 27.6 |
| 1969 | - | 27.3 |
| 1968 | - | 27 |
| 1967 | - | 26.8 |
| 1966 | - | 26.3 |
| 1965 | - | 25.9 |
| 1964 | - | 25.4 |
| 1963 | - | 24.9 |
| 1962 | - | 24.4 |
| 1961 | - | 23.8 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Estonia
|
New Zealand
|
|
| 2024 | 70% | 87.1% |
| 2023 | 69.8% | 87% |
| 2022 | 69.6% | 86.9% |
| 2021 | 69.4% | 86.8% |
| 2020 | 69.2% | 86.7% |
| 2019 | 69.1% | 86.6% |
| 2018 | 68.9% | 86.5% |
| 2017 | 68.7% | 86.5% |
| 2016 | 68.6% | 86.4% |
| 2015 | 68.4% | 86.3% |
| 2014 | 68.3% | 86.3% |
| 2013 | 68.1% | 86.2% |
| 2012 | 68% | 86.2% |
| 2011 | 68% | 86.1% |
| 2010 | 68.1% | 86.2% |
| 2009 | 68.2% | 86.2% |
| 2008 | 68.4% | 86.3% |
| 2007 | 68.5% | 86.3% |
| 2006 | 68.6% | 86.4% |
| 2005 | 68.7% | 86.3% |
| 2004 | 68.9% | 86.3% |
| 2003 | 69% | 86.2% |
| 2002 | 69.1% | 86.2% |
| 2001 | 69.2% | 86.1% |
| 2000 | 69.4% | 86% |
| 1999 | 69.5% | 85.9% |
| 1998 | 69.7% | 85.9% |
| 1997 | 69.9% | 85.8% |
| 1996 | 70.1% | 85.7% |
| 1995 | 70.3% | 85.6% |
| 1994 | 70.5% | 85.4% |
| 1993 | 70.7% | 85.3% |
| 1992 | 70.9% | 85.1% |
| 1991 | 71% | 84.9% |
| 1990 | 71.2% | 84.7% |
| 1989 | 71.4% | 84.5% |
| 1988 | 71.4% | 84.3% |
| 1987 | 71.2% | 84% |
| 1986 | 71% | 83.8% |
| 1985 | 70.8% | 83.7% |
| 1984 | 70.6% | 83.6% |
| 1983 | 70.3% | 83.6% |
| 1982 | 70.1% | 83.6% |
| 1981 | 69.9% | 83.5% |
| 1980 | 69.7% | 83.4% |
| 1979 | 69.5% | 83.3% |
| 1978 | 69.1% | 83.2% |
| 1977 | 68.6% | 83.1% |
| 1976 | 68.1% | 83% |
| 1975 | 67.6% | 82.8% |
| 1974 | 67.1% | 82.5% |
| 1973 | 66.5% | 82.1% |
| 1972 | 66% | 81.8% |
| 1971 | 65.5% | 81.5% |
| 1970 | 64.9% | 81.1% |
| 1969 | 64.3% | 80.7% |
| 1968 | 63.6% | 80.3% |
| 1967 | 62.8% | 79.9% |
| 1966 | 62.1% | 79.4% |
| 1965 | 61.3% | 78.9% |
| 1964 | 60.6% | 78.3% |
| 1963 | 59.8% | 77.7% |
| 1962 | 59.1% | 77.1% |
| 1961 | 58.3% | 76.5% |
| 1960 | 57.5% | 76% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 68.9% to 70% in Estonia and from 86.3% to 87.1% in New Zealand.
Densely populated cities
|
New Zealand
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Auckland | 1.47M |
| Christchurch | 383K |
| Wellington | 216K |
| Hamilton | 176K |
| Tauranga | 151K |
| Dunedin | 106K |
| Lower Hutt | 103K |
| Palmerston North | 81.5K |
| Napier | 66.3K |
| Porirua | 59.6K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
