Bolivia has a population density of 29.7 people per square mile compared to 679 people in Jamaica. Bolivia has 952,608 sq ft of land per person vs 41,673 sq ft in Jamaica. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Bolivia and Jamaica are ranked 183rd and 41st, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Bolivia has 0.15% of the world's population and 0.73% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.03% of the population and 0.007% of the land area for Jamaica, hence the population density in Bolivia is 95.6% lower than in Jamaica.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 29.7 ppl/mi² | 679 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 183/197 | 41/197 |
| Population |
12716350
|
2837071
|
| Land area | 418,264 sq mi | 4,181 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 939,358 sq ft | 41,059 sq ft |
| Rural population | 28.5% | 42.2% |
| Urban population | 71.5% | 57.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 25.4% | 0% |
Bolivia vs Jamaica:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Bolivia increased by 34.9%, compared to a 6.25% growth in Jamaica.
In 2004, Bolivia ranked 177th for population density and is in 183rd place now. Jamaica was 36th in 2004 and ranks 41st out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 29.7 | 679 |
| 2023 | 29.3 | 679 |
| 2022 | 28.9 | 679 |
| 2021 | 28.5 | 679 |
| 2020 | 28.3 | 677 |
| 2019 | 27.9 | 675 |
| 2018 | 27.5 | 674 |
| 2017 | 27.1 | 673 |
| 2016 | 26.7 | 672 |
| 2015 | 26.3 | 670 |
| 2014 | 25.9 | 668 |
| 2013 | 25.5 | 666 |
| 2012 | 25.1 | 663 |
| 2011 | 24.7 | 660 |
| 2010 | 24.3 | 657 |
| 2009 | 23.9 | 655 |
| 2008 | 23.6 | 652 |
| 2007 | 23.2 | 649 |
| 2006 | 22.8 | 646 |
| 2005 | 22.4 | 643 |
| 2004 | 22 | 639 |
| 2003 | 21.6 | 635 |
| 2002 | 21.3 | 631 |
| 2001 | 20.9 | 628 |
| 2000 | 20.6 | 624 |
| 1999 | 20.2 | 619 |
| 1998 | 19.9 | 615 |
| 1997 | 19.5 | 609 |
| 1996 | 19.2 | 604 |
| 1995 | 18.8 | 598 |
| 1994 | 18.5 | 592 |
| 1993 | 18.1 | 586 |
| 1992 | 17.8 | 580 |
| 1991 | 17.4 | 574 |
| 1990 | 17 | 569 |
| 1989 | 16.7 | 565 |
| 1988 | 16.3 | 561 |
| 1987 | 16 | 557 |
| 1986 | 15.7 | 553 |
| 1985 | 15.3 | 548 |
| 1984 | 15 | 542 |
| 1983 | 14.7 | 534 |
| 1982 | 14.4 | 527 |
| 1981 | 14.1 | 520 |
| 1980 | 13.8 | 513 |
| 1979 | 13.5 | 507 |
| 1978 | 13.2 | 501 |
| 1977 | 12.9 | 495 |
| 1976 | 12.6 | 489 |
| 1975 | 12.3 | 483 |
| 1974 | 12 | 476 |
| 1973 | 11.7 | 469 |
| 1972 | 11.5 | 462 |
| 1971 | 11.2 | 455 |
| 1970 | 11 | 449 |
| 1969 | 10.7 | 444 |
| 1968 | 10.5 | 439 |
| 1967 | 10.3 | 434 |
| 1966 | 10 | 428 |
| 1965 | 9.83 | 423 |
| 1964 | 9.62 | 417 |
| 1963 | 9.42 | 412 |
| 1962 | 9.22 | 406 |
| 1961 | 9.03 | 400 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 71.5% | 57.8% |
| 2023 | 71.2% | 57.4% |
| 2022 | 70.8% | 57% |
| 2021 | 70.5% | 56.7% |
| 2020 | 70.1% | 56.3% |
| 2019 | 69.8% | 56% |
| 2018 | 69.4% | 55.7% |
| 2017 | 69.1% | 55.4% |
| 2016 | 68.7% | 55.1% |
| 2015 | 68.4% | 54.8% |
| 2014 | 68% | 54.6% |
| 2013 | 67.7% | 54.4% |
| 2012 | 67.3% | 54.1% |
| 2011 | 66.9% | 53.9% |
| 2010 | 66.4% | 53.7% |
| 2009 | 66% | 53.6% |
| 2008 | 65.5% | 53.4% |
| 2007 | 65.1% | 53.2% |
| 2006 | 64.6% | 53% |
| 2005 | 64.2% | 52.8% |
| 2004 | 63.7% | 52.6% |
| 2003 | 63.2% | 52.4% |
| 2002 | 62.8% | 52.3% |
| 2001 | 62.3% | 52.1% |
| 2000 | 61.8% | 51.8% |
| 1999 | 61.3% | 51.6% |
| 1998 | 60.7% | 51.3% |
| 1997 | 60.2% | 51.1% |
| 1996 | 59.7% | 50.9% |
| 1995 | 59.2% | 50.6% |
| 1994 | 58.6% | 50.4% |
| 1993 | 58.1% | 50.1% |
| 1992 | 57.5% | 49.9% |
| 1991 | 56.6% | 49.7% |
| 1990 | 55.6% | 49.4% |
| 1989 | 54.6% | 49.2% |
| 1988 | 53.6% | 49% |
| 1987 | 52.5% | 48.8% |
| 1986 | 51.5% | 48.6% |
| 1985 | 50.5% | 48.4% |
| 1984 | 49.5% | 48.2% |
| 1983 | 48.5% | 48% |
| 1982 | 47.5% | 47.8% |
| 1981 | 46.5% | 47.3% |
| 1980 | 45.5% | 46.7% |
| 1979 | 44.4% | 46.2% |
| 1978 | 43.4% | 45.6% |
| 1977 | 42.4% | 45.1% |
| 1976 | 41.6% | 44.6% |
| 1975 | 41.3% | 44% |
| 1974 | 41% | 43.5% |
| 1973 | 40.7% | 42.9% |
| 1972 | 40.4% | 42.4% |
| 1971 | 40.1% | 41.9% |
| 1970 | 39.8% | 41.3% |
| 1969 | 39.5% | 40.6% |
| 1968 | 39.2% | 39.8% |
| 1967 | 38.9% | 39% |
| 1966 | 38.6% | 38.3% |
| 1965 | 38.3% | 37.5% |
| 1964 | 38% | 36.7% |
| 1963 | 37.7% | 36% |
| 1962 | 37.4% | 35.2% |
| 1961 | 37.1% | 34.5% |
| 1960 | 36.8% | 33.8% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 63.7% to 71.5% in Bolivia and from 52.6% to 57.8% in Jamaica.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Santa Cruz de la Sierra | 3.15M |
| El Alto | 842K |
| La Paz | 756K |
| Cochabamba | 632K |
| Sucre | 361K |
| Oruro | 265K |
| Potosi | 190K |
| Tarija | 180K |
| Sacaba | 172K |
| Trinidad | 124K |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Kingston | 580K |
| Spanish Town | 131K |
| Montego Bay | 124K |
| Half Way Tree | 96.5K |
| May Pen | 61.5K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons