Bolivia has a population density of 30.5 people per square mile compared to 678 people in Jamaica. Bolivia has 952,608 sq ft of land per person vs 41,673 sq ft in Jamaica. Bolivia and Jamaica rank 183rd and 43rd by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Bolivia has 0.15% of the world's population and 0.73% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.03% of the population and 0.007% of the land area for Jamaica, making the population density in Bolivia 95.5% lower than in Jamaica.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
Bolivia
|
Jamaica
|
|
| 2026 | 30.5 | 678 |
| 2025 | 30.1 | 679 |
| 2024 | 29.7 | 679 |
| 2023 | 29.3 | 679 |
| 2022 | 28.9 | 679 |
| 2021 | 28.5 | 679 |
| 2020 | 28.3 | 677 |
| 2019 | 27.9 | 675 |
| 2018 | 27.5 | 674 |
| 2017 | 27.1 | 673 |
| 2016 | 26.7 | 672 |
| 2015 | 26.3 | 670 |
| 2014 | 25.9 | 668 |
| 2013 | 25.5 | 666 |
| 2012 | 25.1 | 663 |
| 2011 | 24.7 | 660 |
| 2010 | 24.3 | 657 |
| 2009 | 23.9 | 655 |
| 2008 | 23.6 | 652 |
| 2007 | 23.2 | 649 |
| 2006 | 22.8 | 646 |
| 2005 | 22.4 | 643 |
| 2004 | 22 | 639 |
| 2003 | 21.6 | 635 |
| 2002 | 21.3 | 631 |
| 2001 | 20.9 | 628 |
| 2000 | 20.6 | 624 |
| 1999 | 20.2 | 619 |
| 1998 | 19.9 | 615 |
| 1997 | 19.5 | 609 |
| 1996 | 19.2 | 604 |
| 1995 | 18.8 | 598 |
| 1994 | 18.5 | 592 |
| 1993 | 18.1 | 586 |
| 1992 | 17.8 | 580 |
| 1991 | 17.4 | 574 |
| 1990 | 17 | 569 |
| 1989 | 16.7 | 565 |
| 1988 | 16.3 | 561 |
| 1987 | 16 | 557 |
| 1986 | 15.7 | 553 |
| 1985 | 15.3 | 548 |
| 1984 | 15 | 542 |
| 1983 | 14.7 | 534 |
| 1982 | 14.4 | 527 |
| 1981 | 14.1 | 520 |
| 1980 | 13.8 | 513 |
| 1979 | 13.5 | 507 |
| 1978 | 13.2 | 501 |
| 1977 | 12.9 | 495 |
| 1976 | 12.6 | 489 |
| 1975 | 12.3 | 483 |
| 1974 | 12 | 476 |
| 1973 | 11.7 | 469 |
| 1972 | 11.5 | 462 |
| 1971 | 11.2 | 455 |
| 1970 | 11 | 449 |
| 1969 | 10.7 | 444 |
| 1968 | 10.5 | 439 |
| 1967 | 10.3 | 434 |
| 1966 | 10 | 428 |
| 1965 | 9.83 | 423 |
| 1964 | 9.62 | 417 |
| 1963 | 9.42 | 412 |
| 1962 | 9.22 | 406 |
| 1961 | 9.03 | 400 |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (2025–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/bolivia/jamaica | CC BY 
From 2006 to 2026, population density in Bolivia increased by 33.9%, compared to a 4.96% growth in Jamaica.
In 2006, Bolivia ranked 178th by population density and is 183rd now. Jamaica was 36th in 2006 and ranks 43rd out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
Bolivia
|
Jamaica
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 30.5 ppl/mi² | 678 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 183/197 | 43/197 |
| Population |
12798112
|
2834980
|
| Land area | 418,264 sq mi | 4,181 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 939,358 sq ft | 41,059 sq ft |
| Rural population | 28.8% | 41.1% |
| Urban population | 71.2% | 58.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 24.6% | 0% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Bolivia
|
Jamaica
|
|
| 2024 | 71.2% | 58.9% |
| 2023 | 70.9% | 58.5% |
| 2022 | 70.6% | 58% |
| 2021 | 70.3% | 57.5% |
| 2020 | 70% | 57.1% |
| 2019 | 69.7% | 56.7% |
| 2018 | 69.4% | 56.3% |
| 2017 | 69.1% | 55.9% |
| 2016 | 68.7% | 55.5% |
| 2015 | 68.4% | 55.2% |
| 2014 | 68% | 54.9% |
| 2013 | 67.7% | 54.5% |
| 2012 | 67.3% | 54.2% |
| 2011 | 66.8% | 54% |
| 2010 | 66.4% | 53.8% |
| 2009 | 66% | 53.6% |
| 2008 | 65.5% | 53.4% |
| 2007 | 65.1% | 53.2% |
| 2006 | 64.7% | 53% |
| 2005 | 64.2% | 52.8% |
| 2004 | 63.8% | 52.6% |
| 2003 | 63.3% | 52.4% |
| 2002 | 62.8% | 52.1% |
| 2001 | 62.3% | 51.9% |
| 2000 | 61.9% | 51.7% |
| 1999 | 61.4% | 51.5% |
| 1998 | 60.9% | 51.3% |
| 1997 | 60.4% | 51% |
| 1996 | 59.9% | 50.8% |
| 1995 | 59.4% | 50.6% |
| 1994 | 58.8% | 50.3% |
| 1993 | 58.2% | 50.1% |
| 1992 | 57.6% | 49.9% |
| 1991 | 56.8% | 49.7% |
| 1990 | 55.9% | 49.4% |
| 1989 | 54.9% | 49.3% |
| 1988 | 53.8% | 49.1% |
| 1987 | 52.6% | 48.9% |
| 1986 | 51.3% | 48.7% |
| 1985 | 50.1% | 48.5% |
| 1984 | 48.8% | 48.3% |
| 1983 | 47.5% | 48.1% |
| 1982 | 46.3% | 47.8% |
| 1981 | 45.2% | 47.5% |
| 1980 | 44.1% | 47.2% |
| 1979 | 43.1% | 46.8% |
| 1978 | 42.3% | 46.3% |
| 1977 | 41.7% | 45.8% |
| 1976 | 41.2% | 45.3% |
| 1975 | 40.8% | 44.8% |
| 1974 | 40.5% | 44.2% |
| 1973 | 40.1% | 43.5% |
| 1972 | 39.8% | 42.9% |
| 1971 | 39.5% | 42.2% |
| 1970 | 39.2% | 41.4% |
| 1969 | 38.9% | 40.6% |
| 1968 | 38.6% | 39.6% |
| 1967 | 38.4% | 38.4% |
| 1966 | 38.1% | 37.2% |
| 1965 | 37.9% | 35.8% |
| 1964 | 37.7% | 34.5% |
| 1963 | 37.5% | 33.2% |
| 1962 | 37.3% | 31.9% |
| 1961 | 37.1% | 30.7% |
| 1960 | 36.9% | 29.7% |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/bolivia/jamaica | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 63.8% to 71.2% in Bolivia and from 52.6% to 58.9% in Jamaica.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/bolivia/jamaica | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2001–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.