Bolivia has a population density of 29.7 people per square mile compared to 250.6 people in Honduras. Bolivia has 952,608 sq ft of land per person vs 111,850 sq ft in Honduras. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Bolivia and Honduras are ranked 183rd and 97th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Bolivia has 0.15% of the world's population and 0.73% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.13% of the population and 0.08% of the land area for Honduras, hence the population density in Bolivia is 88.2% lower than in Honduras.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 29.7 ppl/mi² | 250.6 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 183/197 | 97/197 |
| Population |
12716350
|
11149564
|
| Land area | 418,264 sq mi | 43,201 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 939,358 sq ft | 111,251 sq ft |
| Rural population | 28.5% | 39.2% |
| Urban population | 71.5% | 60.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 25.4% | 9.75% |
Bolivia vs Honduras:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Bolivia increased by 34.9%, compared to a 48.3% growth in Honduras.
In 2004, Bolivia ranked 177th for population density and is in 183rd place now. Honduras was 106th in 2004 and ranks 97th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 29.7 | 250.6 |
| 2023 | 29.3 | 246.4 |
| 2022 | 28.9 | 242.2 |
| 2021 | 28.5 | 238.2 |
| 2020 | 28.3 | 234.2 |
| 2019 | 27.9 | 230.2 |
| 2018 | 27.5 | 226 |
| 2017 | 27.1 | 221.9 |
| 2016 | 26.7 | 217.9 |
| 2015 | 26.3 | 213.8 |
| 2014 | 25.9 | 209.8 |
| 2013 | 25.5 | 205.8 |
| 2012 | 25.1 | 201.7 |
| 2011 | 24.7 | 197.7 |
| 2010 | 24.3 | 193.7 |
| 2009 | 23.9 | 189.6 |
| 2008 | 23.6 | 185.5 |
| 2007 | 23.2 | 181.4 |
| 2006 | 22.8 | 177.2 |
| 2005 | 22.4 | 173.1 |
| 2004 | 22 | 169 |
| 2003 | 21.6 | 164.8 |
| 2002 | 21.3 | 160.6 |
| 2001 | 20.9 | 156.4 |
| 2000 | 20.6 | 152.3 |
| 1999 | 20.2 | 148.2 |
| 1998 | 19.9 | 144.3 |
| 1997 | 19.5 | 140.5 |
| 1996 | 19.2 | 136.7 |
| 1995 | 18.8 | 132.9 |
| 1994 | 18.5 | 129.1 |
| 1993 | 18.1 | 125.5 |
| 1992 | 17.8 | 122 |
| 1991 | 17.4 | 118.6 |
| 1990 | 17 | 115.3 |
| 1989 | 16.7 | 112.1 |
| 1988 | 16.3 | 109 |
| 1987 | 16 | 105.9 |
| 1986 | 15.7 | 103 |
| 1985 | 15.3 | 100.1 |
| 1984 | 15 | 97.2 |
| 1983 | 14.7 | 94.4 |
| 1982 | 14.4 | 91.6 |
| 1981 | 14.1 | 88.9 |
| 1980 | 13.8 | 86.3 |
| 1979 | 13.5 | 83.7 |
| 1978 | 13.2 | 81.1 |
| 1977 | 12.9 | 78.7 |
| 1976 | 12.6 | 76.3 |
| 1975 | 12.3 | 73.9 |
| 1974 | 12 | 71.8 |
| 1973 | 11.7 | 69.7 |
| 1972 | 11.5 | 67.6 |
| 1971 | 11.2 | 65.6 |
| 1970 | 11 | 63.7 |
| 1969 | 10.7 | 61.8 |
| 1968 | 10.5 | 60 |
| 1967 | 10.3 | 58.3 |
| 1966 | 10 | 56.6 |
| 1965 | 9.83 | 55 |
| 1964 | 9.62 | 53.5 |
| 1963 | 9.42 | 52 |
| 1962 | 9.22 | 50.5 |
| 1961 | 9.03 | 49.1 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 71.5% | 60.8% |
| 2023 | 71.2% | 60.2% |
| 2022 | 70.8% | 59.6% |
| 2021 | 70.5% | 59% |
| 2020 | 70.1% | 58.4% |
| 2019 | 69.8% | 57.7% |
| 2018 | 69.4% | 57.1% |
| 2017 | 69.1% | 56.5% |
| 2016 | 68.7% | 55.8% |
| 2015 | 68.4% | 55.2% |
| 2014 | 68% | 54.5% |
| 2013 | 67.7% | 53.9% |
| 2012 | 67.3% | 53.2% |
| 2011 | 66.9% | 52.5% |
| 2010 | 66.4% | 51.9% |
| 2009 | 66% | 51.2% |
| 2008 | 65.5% | 50.6% |
| 2007 | 65.1% | 49.9% |
| 2006 | 64.6% | 49.2% |
| 2005 | 64.2% | 48.6% |
| 2004 | 63.7% | 47.9% |
| 2003 | 63.2% | 47.3% |
| 2002 | 62.8% | 46.6% |
| 2001 | 62.3% | 46% |
| 2000 | 61.8% | 45.5% |
| 1999 | 61.3% | 45% |
| 1998 | 60.7% | 44.4% |
| 1997 | 60.2% | 43.9% |
| 1996 | 59.7% | 43.4% |
| 1995 | 59.2% | 42.9% |
| 1994 | 58.6% | 42.4% |
| 1993 | 58.1% | 41.9% |
| 1992 | 57.5% | 41.4% |
| 1991 | 56.6% | 41% |
| 1990 | 55.6% | 40.5% |
| 1989 | 54.6% | 40% |
| 1988 | 53.6% | 39.5% |
| 1987 | 52.5% | 38.9% |
| 1986 | 51.5% | 38.3% |
| 1985 | 50.5% | 37.7% |
| 1984 | 49.5% | 37.2% |
| 1983 | 48.5% | 36.6% |
| 1982 | 47.5% | 36% |
| 1981 | 46.5% | 35.4% |
| 1980 | 45.5% | 34.9% |
| 1979 | 44.4% | 34.3% |
| 1978 | 43.4% | 33.8% |
| 1977 | 42.4% | 33.2% |
| 1976 | 41.6% | 32.7% |
| 1975 | 41.3% | 32.1% |
| 1974 | 41% | 31.6% |
| 1973 | 40.7% | 30.9% |
| 1972 | 40.4% | 30.2% |
| 1971 | 40.1% | 29.6% |
| 1970 | 39.8% | 28.9% |
| 1969 | 39.5% | 28.2% |
| 1968 | 39.2% | 27.6% |
| 1967 | 38.9% | 27% |
| 1966 | 38.6% | 26.3% |
| 1965 | 38.3% | 25.7% |
| 1964 | 38% | 25.1% |
| 1963 | 37.7% | 24.5% |
| 1962 | 37.4% | 23.9% |
| 1961 | 37.1% | 23.3% |
| 1960 | 36.8% | 22.7% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 63.7% to 71.5% in Bolivia and from 47.9% to 60.8% in Honduras.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Santa Cruz de la Sierra | 3.15M |
| El Alto | 842K |
| La Paz | 756K |
| Cochabamba | 632K |
| Sucre | 361K |
| Oruro | 265K |
| Potosi | 190K |
| Tarija | 180K |
| Sacaba | 172K |
| Trinidad | 124K |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Tegucigalpa | 1.06M |
| San Pedro Sula | 719K |
| Choloma | 232K |
| La Ceiba | 197K |
| El Progreso | 188K |
| Villanueva | 150K |
| Comayagua | 145K |
| Puerto Cortes | 122K |
| Yoro | 86.7K |
| La Lima | 71.9K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons