Bolivia has a population density of 29.7 people per square mile compared to 4,587 people in Maldives. Bolivia has 952,608 sq ft of land per person vs 6,077 sq ft in Maldives. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Bolivia and Maldives are ranked 183rd and 6th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Bolivia has 0.15% of the world's population and 0.73% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.006% of the population and 0.0002% of the land area for Maldives, hence the population density in Bolivia is 99.4% lower than in Maldives.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 29.7 ppl/mi² | 4,587 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 183/197 | 6/197 |
| Population |
12716350
|
531152
|
| Land area | 418,264 sq mi | 115.1 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 939,358 sq ft | 6,077 sq ft |
| Rural population | 28.5% | 57.6% |
| Urban population | 71.5% | 42.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 25.4% | 0% |
Bolivia vs Maldives:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Bolivia increased by 34.9%, compared to a 76.3% growth in Maldives.
In 2004, Bolivia ranked 177th for population density and is in 183rd place now. Maldives was 7th in 2004 and ranks 6th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 29.7 | 4,587 |
| 2023 | 29.3 | 4,572 |
| 2022 | 28.9 | 4,525 |
| 2021 | 28.5 | 4,456 |
| 2020 | 28.3 | 4,335 |
| 2019 | 27.9 | 4,211 |
| 2018 | 27.5 | 4,084 |
| 2017 | 27.1 | 3,957 |
| 2016 | 26.7 | 3,827 |
| 2015 | 26.3 | 3,696 |
| 2014 | 25.9 | 3,571 |
| 2013 | 25.5 | 3,454 |
| 2012 | 25.1 | 3,340 |
| 2011 | 24.7 | 3,226 |
| 2010 | 24.3 | 3,115 |
| 2009 | 23.9 | 3,007 |
| 2008 | 23.6 | 2,902 |
| 2007 | 23.2 | 2,801 |
| 2006 | 22.8 | 2,710 |
| 2005 | 22.4 | 2,645 |
| 2004 | 22 | 2,602 |
| 2003 | 21.6 | 2,560 |
| 2002 | 21.3 | 2,518 |
| 2001 | 20.9 | 2,476 |
| 2000 | 20.6 | 2,435 |
| 1999 | 20.2 | 2,395 |
| 1998 | 19.9 | 2,354 |
| 1997 | 19.5 | 2,311 |
| 1996 | 19.2 | 2,265 |
| 1995 | 18.8 | 2,216 |
| 1994 | 18.5 | 2,165 |
| 1993 | 18.1 | 2,114 |
| 1992 | 17.8 | 2,059 |
| 1991 | 17.4 | 2,001 |
| 1990 | 17 | 1,940 |
| 1989 | 16.7 | 1,880 |
| 1988 | 16.3 | 1,821 |
| 1987 | 16 | 1,761 |
| 1986 | 15.7 | 1,700 |
| 1985 | 15.3 | 1,642 |
| 1984 | 15 | 1,590 |
| 1983 | 14.7 | 1,546 |
| 1982 | 14.4 | 1,505 |
| 1981 | 14.1 | 1,464 |
| 1980 | 13.8 | 1,423 |
| 1979 | 13.5 | 1,384 |
| 1978 | 13.2 | 1,348 |
| 1977 | 12.9 | 1,312 |
| 1976 | 12.6 | 1,274 |
| 1975 | 12.3 | 1,236 |
| 1974 | 12 | 1,200 |
| 1973 | 11.7 | 1,165 |
| 1972 | 11.5 | 1,131 |
| 1971 | 11.2 | 1,097 |
| 1970 | 11 | 1,064 |
| 1969 | 10.7 | 1,032 |
| 1968 | 10.5 | 1,002 |
| 1967 | 10.3 | 971 |
| 1966 | 10 | 937 |
| 1965 | 9.83 | 899 |
| 1964 | 9.62 | 869 |
| 1963 | 9.42 | 848 |
| 1962 | 9.22 | 827 |
| 1961 | 9.03 | 807 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 71.5% | 42.4% |
| 2023 | 71.2% | 42% |
| 2022 | 70.8% | 41.5% |
| 2021 | 70.5% | 41.1% |
| 2020 | 70.1% | 40.7% |
| 2019 | 69.8% | 40.2% |
| 2018 | 69.4% | 39.8% |
| 2017 | 69.1% | 39.4% |
| 2016 | 68.7% | 39% |
| 2015 | 68.4% | 38.5% |
| 2014 | 68% | 38.1% |
| 2013 | 67.7% | 37.7% |
| 2012 | 67.3% | 37.3% |
| 2011 | 66.9% | 36.8% |
| 2010 | 66.4% | 36.4% |
| 2009 | 66% | 36% |
| 2008 | 65.5% | 35.6% |
| 2007 | 65.1% | 35.2% |
| 2006 | 64.6% | 34.8% |
| 2005 | 64.2% | 33.8% |
| 2004 | 63.7% | 32.5% |
| 2003 | 63.2% | 31.3% |
| 2002 | 62.8% | 30% |
| 2001 | 62.3% | 28.9% |
| 2000 | 61.8% | 27.7% |
| 1999 | 61.3% | 27.1% |
| 1998 | 60.7% | 26.8% |
| 1997 | 60.2% | 26.4% |
| 1996 | 59.7% | 26% |
| 1995 | 59.2% | 25.6% |
| 1994 | 58.6% | 25.6% |
| 1993 | 58.1% | 25.6% |
| 1992 | 57.5% | 25.7% |
| 1991 | 56.6% | 25.8% |
| 1990 | 55.6% | 25.8% |
| 1989 | 54.6% | 25.8% |
| 1988 | 53.6% | 25.7% |
| 1987 | 52.5% | 25.6% |
| 1986 | 51.5% | 25.6% |
| 1985 | 50.5% | 25.5% |
| 1984 | 49.5% | 25% |
| 1983 | 48.5% | 24.3% |
| 1982 | 47.5% | 23.6% |
| 1981 | 46.5% | 22.9% |
| 1980 | 45.5% | 22.3% |
| 1979 | 44.4% | 21.6% |
| 1978 | 43.4% | 21% |
| 1977 | 42.4% | 20% |
| 1976 | 41.6% | 18.6% |
| 1975 | 41.3% | 17.3% |
| 1974 | 41% | 16.1% |
| 1973 | 40.7% | 14.9% |
| 1972 | 40.4% | 13.9% |
| 1971 | 40.1% | 12.8% |
| 1970 | 39.8% | 11.9% |
| 1969 | 39.5% | 11.7% |
| 1968 | 39.2% | 11.5% |
| 1967 | 38.9% | 11.3% |
| 1966 | 38.6% | 11.4% |
| 1965 | 38.3% | 11.5% |
| 1964 | 38% | 11.4% |
| 1963 | 37.7% | 11.3% |
| 1962 | 37.4% | 11.3% |
| 1961 | 37.1% | 11.2% |
| 1960 | 36.8% | 11.2% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 63.7% to 71.5% in Bolivia and from 32.5% to 42.4% in Maldives.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons