Bolivia has a population density of 29.7 people per square mile compared to 48,010 people in Monaco. Bolivia has 952,608 sq ft of land per person vs 580 sq ft in Monaco. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Bolivia and Monaco are ranked 183rd and 1st, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Bolivia has 0.15% of the world's population and 0.73% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.0005% of the population and 0.000001% of the land area for Monaco, hence the population density in Bolivia is 99.9% lower than in Monaco.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 29.7 ppl/mi² | 48,010 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 183/197 | 1/197 |
| Population |
12716350
|
38341
|
| Land area | 418,264 sq mi | 0.8 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 939,358 sq ft | 581 sq ft |
| Rural population | 28.5% | 0% |
| Urban population | 71.5% | 100% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 25.4% | 0% |
Bolivia vs Monaco:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Bolivia increased by 34.9%, compared to a 16.3% growth in Monaco.
In 2004, Bolivia ranked 177th for population density and is in 183rd place now. Monaco was 1st in 2004 and still ranks 1st out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 29.7 | 48,010 |
| 2023 | 29.3 | 48,414 |
| 2022 | 28.9 | 48,383 |
| 2021 | 28.5 | 47,881 |
| 2020 | 28.3 | 48,618 |
| 2019 | 27.9 | 48,694 |
| 2018 | 27.5 | 48,751 |
| 2017 | 27.1 | 48,143 |
| 2016 | 26.7 | 47,629 |
| 2015 | 26.3 | 46,966 |
| 2014 | 25.9 | 46,162 |
| 2013 | 25.5 | 45,292 |
| 2012 | 25.1 | 44,352 |
| 2011 | 24.7 | 43,374 |
| 2010 | 24.3 | 42,374 |
| 2009 | 23.9 | 41,353 |
| 2008 | 23.6 | 40,678 |
| 2007 | 23.2 | 40,680 |
| 2006 | 22.8 | 40,961 |
| 2005 | 22.4 | 41,156 |
| 2004 | 22 | 41,280 |
| 2003 | 21.6 | 41,366 |
| 2002 | 21.3 | 41,427 |
| 2001 | 20.9 | 41,459 |
| 2000 | 20.6 | 41,469 |
| 1999 | 20.2 | 41,412 |
| 1998 | 19.9 | 41,229 |
| 1997 | 19.5 | 40,968 |
| 1996 | 19.2 | 40,680 |
| 1995 | 18.8 | 40,388 |
| 1994 | 18.5 | 40,089 |
| 1993 | 18.1 | 39,784 |
| 1992 | 17.8 | 39,466 |
| 1991 | 17.4 | 39,131 |
| 1990 | 17 | 38,790 |
| 1989 | 16.7 | 38,440 |
| 1988 | 16.3 | 38,053 |
| 1987 | 16 | 37,624 |
| 1986 | 15.7 | 37,173 |
| 1985 | 15.3 | 36,711 |
| 1984 | 15 | 36,232 |
| 1983 | 14.7 | 35,726 |
| 1982 | 14.4 | 35,216 |
| 1981 | 14.1 | 34,873 |
| 1980 | 13.8 | 34,655 |
| 1979 | 13.5 | 34,361 |
| 1978 | 13.2 | 33,994 |
| 1977 | 12.9 | 33,570 |
| 1976 | 12.6 | 33,087 |
| 1975 | 12.3 | 32,582 |
| 1974 | 12 | 32,244 |
| 1973 | 11.7 | 32,036 |
| 1972 | 11.5 | 31,767 |
| 1971 | 11.2 | 31,402 |
| 1970 | 11 | 30,958 |
| 1969 | 10.7 | 30,450 |
| 1968 | 10.5 | 29,946 |
| 1967 | 10.3 | 29,682 |
| 1966 | 10 | 29,556 |
| 1965 | 9.83 | 29,313 |
| 1964 | 9.62 | 28,987 |
| 1963 | 9.42 | 28,602 |
| 1962 | 9.22 | 28,210 |
| 1961 | 9.03 | 27,984 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 71.5% | 100% |
| 2023 | 71.2% | 100% |
| 2022 | 70.8% | 100% |
| 2021 | 70.5% | 100% |
| 2020 | 70.1% | 100% |
| 2019 | 69.8% | 100% |
| 2018 | 69.4% | 100% |
| 2017 | 69.1% | 100% |
| 2016 | 68.7% | 100% |
| 2015 | 68.4% | 100% |
| 2014 | 68% | 100% |
| 2013 | 67.7% | 100% |
| 2012 | 67.3% | 100% |
| 2011 | 66.9% | 100% |
| 2010 | 66.4% | 100% |
| 2009 | 66% | 100% |
| 2008 | 65.5% | 100% |
| 2007 | 65.1% | 100% |
| 2006 | 64.6% | 100% |
| 2005 | 64.2% | 100% |
| 2004 | 63.7% | 100% |
| 2003 | 63.2% | 100% |
| 2002 | 62.8% | 100% |
| 2001 | 62.3% | 100% |
| 2000 | 61.8% | 100% |
| 1999 | 61.3% | 100% |
| 1998 | 60.7% | 100% |
| 1997 | 60.2% | 100% |
| 1996 | 59.7% | 100% |
| 1995 | 59.2% | 100% |
| 1994 | 58.6% | 100% |
| 1993 | 58.1% | 100% |
| 1992 | 57.5% | 100% |
| 1991 | 56.6% | 100% |
| 1990 | 55.6% | 100% |
| 1989 | 54.6% | 100% |
| 1988 | 53.6% | 100% |
| 1987 | 52.5% | 100% |
| 1986 | 51.5% | 100% |
| 1985 | 50.5% | 100% |
| 1984 | 49.5% | 100% |
| 1983 | 48.5% | 100% |
| 1982 | 47.5% | 100% |
| 1981 | 46.5% | 100% |
| 1980 | 45.5% | 100% |
| 1979 | 44.4% | 100% |
| 1978 | 43.4% | 100% |
| 1977 | 42.4% | 100% |
| 1976 | 41.6% | 100% |
| 1975 | 41.3% | 100% |
| 1974 | 41% | 100% |
| 1973 | 40.7% | 100% |
| 1972 | 40.4% | 100% |
| 1971 | 40.1% | 100% |
| 1970 | 39.8% | 100% |
| 1969 | 39.5% | 100% |
| 1968 | 39.2% | 100% |
| 1967 | 38.9% | 100% |
| 1966 | 38.6% | 100% |
| 1965 | 38.3% | 100% |
| 1964 | 38% | 100% |
| 1963 | 37.7% | 100% |
| 1962 | 37.4% | 100% |
| 1961 | 37.1% | 100% |
| 1960 | 36.8% | 100% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 63.7% to 71.5% in Bolivia and from 100% to 100% in Monaco.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons