Monaco has a population density of 48,010 people per square mile compared to 203.1 people in Samoa. Monaco has 580 sq ft of land per person vs 140,314 sq ft in Samoa. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Monaco and Samoa are ranked 1st and 109th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Monaco has 0.0005% of the world's population and 0.000001% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.003% of the population and 0.002% of the land area for Samoa, hence the population density in Monaco is 23,537% higher than in Samoa.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 48,010 ppl/mi² | 203.1 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 1/197 | 109/197 |
| Population |
38341
|
220288
|
| Land area | 0.8 sq mi | 1,073 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 581 sq ft | 137,253 sq ft |
| Rural population | 0% | 82.6% |
| Urban population | 100% | 17.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Monaco vs Samoa:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Monaco increased by 16.3%, compared to a 19.2% growth in Samoa.
In 2004, Monaco ranked 1st for population density and is in 1st place still. Samoa was 104th in 2004 and ranks 109th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 48,010 | 203.1 |
| 2023 | 48,414 | 201.9 |
| 2022 | 48,383 | 200.5 |
| 2021 | 47,881 | 199.2 |
| 2020 | 48,618 | 197.5 |
| 2019 | 48,694 | 195.4 |
| 2018 | 48,751 | 193.4 |
| 2017 | 48,143 | 191.4 |
| 2016 | 47,629 | 186.2 |
| 2015 | 46,966 | 184.7 |
| 2014 | 46,162 | 183.1 |
| 2013 | 45,292 | 181.5 |
| 2012 | 44,352 | 179.8 |
| 2011 | 43,374 | 178.2 |
| 2010 | 42,374 | 176.7 |
| 2009 | 41,353 | 175.3 |
| 2008 | 40,678 | 174 |
| 2007 | 40,680 | 172.7 |
| 2006 | 40,961 | 171.8 |
| 2005 | 41,156 | 171.1 |
| 2004 | 41,280 | 170.5 |
| 2003 | 41,366 | 169.7 |
| 2002 | 41,427 | 168.8 |
| 2001 | 41,459 | 167.6 |
| 2000 | 41,469 | 166.3 |
| 1999 | 41,412 | 165 |
| 1998 | 41,229 | 163.7 |
| 1997 | 40,968 | 162.5 |
| 1996 | 40,680 | 161.1 |
| 1995 | 40,388 | 159.8 |
| 1994 | 40,089 | 158.5 |
| 1993 | 39,784 | 157.2 |
| 1992 | 39,466 | 155.9 |
| 1991 | 39,131 | 155 |
| 1990 | 38,790 | 154.7 |
| 1989 | 38,440 | 154.5 |
| 1988 | 38,053 | 154.1 |
| 1987 | 37,624 | 153.4 |
| 1986 | 37,173 | 152.9 |
| 1985 | 36,711 | 152.7 |
| 1984 | 36,232 | 152.7 |
| 1983 | 35,726 | 152.6 |
| 1982 | 35,216 | 152.4 |
| 1981 | 34,873 | 151.6 |
| 1980 | 34,655 | 150.4 |
| 1979 | 34,361 | 149.1 |
| 1978 | 33,994 | 147.7 |
| 1977 | 33,570 | 146.2 |
| 1976 | 33,087 | 143.8 |
| 1975 | 32,582 | 140.3 |
| 1974 | 32,244 | 136.8 |
| 1973 | 32,036 | 134.1 |
| 1972 | 31,767 | 132.3 |
| 1971 | 31,402 | 130.4 |
| 1970 | 30,958 | 128.5 |
| 1969 | 30,450 | 126.5 |
| 1968 | 29,946 | 124.5 |
| 1967 | 29,682 | 122.4 |
| 1966 | 29,556 | 120 |
| 1965 | 29,313 | 117.1 |
| 1964 | 28,987 | 114.3 |
| 1963 | 28,602 | 111.4 |
| 1962 | 28,210 | 108.5 |
| 1961 | 27,984 | 105.7 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 100% | 17.4% |
| 2023 | 100% | 17.5% |
| 2022 | 100% | 17.6% |
| 2021 | 100% | 17.7% |
| 2020 | 100% | 17.9% |
| 2019 | 100% | 18.1% |
| 2018 | 100% | 18.2% |
| 2017 | 100% | 18.5% |
| 2016 | 100% | 18.7% |
| 2015 | 100% | 18.9% |
| 2014 | 100% | 19.1% |
| 2013 | 100% | 19.4% |
| 2012 | 100% | 19.6% |
| 2011 | 100% | 19.9% |
| 2010 | 100% | 20.1% |
| 2009 | 100% | 20.3% |
| 2008 | 100% | 20.5% |
| 2007 | 100% | 20.7% |
| 2006 | 100% | 21% |
| 2005 | 100% | 21.2% |
| 2004 | 100% | 21.5% |
| 2003 | 100% | 21.7% |
| 2002 | 100% | 21.9% |
| 2001 | 100% | 22.1% |
| 2000 | 100% | 22% |
| 1999 | 100% | 21.9% |
| 1998 | 100% | 21.8% |
| 1997 | 100% | 21.7% |
| 1996 | 100% | 21.6% |
| 1995 | 100% | 21.5% |
| 1994 | 100% | 21.4% |
| 1993 | 100% | 21.3% |
| 1992 | 100% | 21.3% |
| 1991 | 100% | 21.2% |
| 1990 | 100% | 21.2% |
| 1989 | 100% | 21.2% |
| 1988 | 100% | 21.2% |
| 1987 | 100% | 21.2% |
| 1986 | 100% | 21.2% |
| 1985 | 100% | 21.2% |
| 1984 | 100% | 21.2% |
| 1983 | 100% | 21.2% |
| 1982 | 100% | 21.2% |
| 1981 | 100% | 21.2% |
| 1980 | 100% | 21.2% |
| 1979 | 100% | 21.2% |
| 1978 | 100% | 21.1% |
| 1977 | 100% | 21.1% |
| 1976 | 100% | 21.1% |
| 1975 | 100% | 21% |
| 1974 | 100% | 20.9% |
| 1973 | 100% | 20.8% |
| 1972 | 100% | 20.8% |
| 1971 | 100% | 20.6% |
| 1970 | 100% | 20.4% |
| 1969 | 100% | 20.1% |
| 1968 | 100% | 19.8% |
| 1967 | 100% | 19.6% |
| 1966 | 100% | 19.4% |
| 1965 | 100% | 19.3% |
| 1964 | 100% | 19.2% |
| 1963 | 100% | 19.1% |
| 1962 | 100% | 19.1% |
| 1961 | 100% | 19% |
| 1960 | 100% | 18.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 100% to 100% in Monaco and from 21.5% to 17.4% in Samoa.
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons