Monaco has a population density of 48,010 people per square mile compared to 50.1 people in Uruguay. Monaco has 580 sq ft of land per person vs 560,081 sq ft in Uruguay. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Monaco and Uruguay are ranked 1st and 171st, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Monaco has 0.0005% of the world's population and 0.000001% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.04% of the population and 0.12% of the land area for Uruguay, hence the population density in Monaco is 95,700% higher than in Uruguay.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 48,010 ppl/mi² | 50.1 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 1/197 | 171/197 |
| Population |
38341
|
3384690
|
| Land area | 0.8 sq mi | 67,576 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 581 sq ft | 556,282 sq ft |
| Rural population | 0% | 4.15% |
| Urban population | 100% | 95.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 38.5% |
Monaco vs Uruguay:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Monaco increased by 16.3%, compared to a 3.15% growth in Uruguay.
In 2004, Monaco ranked 1st for population density and is in 1st place still. Uruguay was 156th in 2004 and ranks 171st out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 48,010 | 50.1 |
| 2023 | 48,414 | 50.1 |
| 2022 | 48,383 | 50.2 |
| 2021 | 47,881 | 50.3 |
| 2020 | 48,618 | 50.3 |
| 2019 | 48,694 | 50.3 |
| 2018 | 48,751 | 50.2 |
| 2017 | 48,143 | 50.1 |
| 2016 | 47,629 | 50 |
| 2015 | 46,966 | 49.8 |
| 2014 | 46,162 | 49.7 |
| 2013 | 45,292 | 49.5 |
| 2012 | 44,352 | 49.4 |
| 2011 | 43,374 | 49.2 |
| 2010 | 42,374 | 49.1 |
| 2009 | 41,353 | 49 |
| 2008 | 40,678 | 48.9 |
| 2007 | 40,680 | 48.8 |
| 2006 | 40,961 | 48.7 |
| 2005 | 41,156 | 48.6 |
| 2004 | 41,280 | 48.6 |
| 2003 | 41,366 | 48.6 |
| 2002 | 41,427 | 48.5 |
| 2001 | 41,459 | 48.5 |
| 2000 | 41,469 | 48.3 |
| 1999 | 41,412 | 48.2 |
| 1998 | 41,229 | 47.9 |
| 1997 | 40,968 | 47.7 |
| 1996 | 40,680 | 47.4 |
| 1995 | 40,388 | 47.2 |
| 1994 | 40,089 | 47 |
| 1993 | 39,784 | 46.7 |
| 1992 | 39,466 | 46.5 |
| 1991 | 39,131 | 46.2 |
| 1990 | 38,790 | 45.9 |
| 1989 | 38,440 | 45.7 |
| 1988 | 38,053 | 45.4 |
| 1987 | 37,624 | 45.1 |
| 1986 | 37,173 | 44.9 |
| 1985 | 36,711 | 44.6 |
| 1984 | 36,232 | 44.4 |
| 1983 | 35,726 | 44.2 |
| 1982 | 35,216 | 44 |
| 1981 | 34,873 | 43.9 |
| 1980 | 34,655 | 43.7 |
| 1979 | 34,361 | 43.5 |
| 1978 | 33,994 | 43.3 |
| 1977 | 33,570 | 43.1 |
| 1976 | 33,087 | 42.8 |
| 1975 | 32,582 | 42.5 |
| 1974 | 32,244 | 42.2 |
| 1973 | 32,036 | 42 |
| 1972 | 31,767 | 41.8 |
| 1971 | 31,402 | 41.5 |
| 1970 | 30,958 | 41.3 |
| 1969 | 30,450 | 41 |
| 1968 | 29,946 | 40.8 |
| 1967 | 29,682 | 40.4 |
| 1966 | 29,556 | 40.1 |
| 1965 | 29,313 | 39.7 |
| 1964 | 28,987 | 39.3 |
| 1963 | 28,602 | 38.8 |
| 1962 | 28,210 | 38.4 |
| 1961 | 27,984 | 37.9 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 100% | 95.9% |
| 2023 | 100% | 95.8% |
| 2022 | 100% | 95.7% |
| 2021 | 100% | 95.6% |
| 2020 | 100% | 95.5% |
| 2019 | 100% | 95.4% |
| 2018 | 100% | 95.3% |
| 2017 | 100% | 95.2% |
| 2016 | 100% | 95.1% |
| 2015 | 100% | 95% |
| 2014 | 100% | 94.9% |
| 2013 | 100% | 94.8% |
| 2012 | 100% | 94.7% |
| 2011 | 100% | 94.6% |
| 2010 | 100% | 94.4% |
| 2009 | 100% | 94.2% |
| 2008 | 100% | 94% |
| 2007 | 100% | 93.8% |
| 2006 | 100% | 93.6% |
| 2005 | 100% | 93.3% |
| 2004 | 100% | 93.1% |
| 2003 | 100% | 92.8% |
| 2002 | 100% | 92.6% |
| 2001 | 100% | 92.3% |
| 2000 | 100% | 92% |
| 1999 | 100% | 91.7% |
| 1998 | 100% | 91.5% |
| 1997 | 100% | 91.1% |
| 1996 | 100% | 90.8% |
| 1995 | 100% | 90.5% |
| 1994 | 100% | 90.2% |
| 1993 | 100% | 89.9% |
| 1992 | 100% | 89.6% |
| 1991 | 100% | 89.3% |
| 1990 | 100% | 89% |
| 1989 | 100% | 88.6% |
| 1988 | 100% | 88.3% |
| 1987 | 100% | 87.9% |
| 1986 | 100% | 87.6% |
| 1985 | 100% | 87.2% |
| 1984 | 100% | 86.9% |
| 1983 | 100% | 86.5% |
| 1982 | 100% | 86.1% |
| 1981 | 100% | 85.8% |
| 1980 | 100% | 85.4% |
| 1979 | 100% | 85% |
| 1978 | 100% | 84.6% |
| 1977 | 100% | 84.2% |
| 1976 | 100% | 83.8% |
| 1975 | 100% | 83.4% |
| 1974 | 100% | 83.2% |
| 1973 | 100% | 83% |
| 1972 | 100% | 82.8% |
| 1971 | 100% | 82.6% |
| 1970 | 100% | 82.4% |
| 1969 | 100% | 82.2% |
| 1968 | 100% | 82% |
| 1967 | 100% | 81.7% |
| 1966 | 100% | 81.5% |
| 1965 | 100% | 81.3% |
| 1964 | 100% | 81.1% |
| 1963 | 100% | 80.9% |
| 1962 | 100% | 80.7% |
| 1961 | 100% | 80.5% |
| 1960 | 100% | 80.2% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 100% to 100% in Monaco and from 93.1% to 95.9% in Uruguay.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Montevideo | 1.3M |
| Salto | 125K |
| Ciudad de la Costa | 112K |
| Rivera | 103K |
| Maldonado | 86.8K |
| Paysandu | 76.4K |
| Tacuarembo | 54.8K |
| Melo | 51.8K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons