Monaco has a population density of 48,010 people per square mile compared to 9.53 people in Namibia. Monaco has 580 sq ft of land per person vs 2,932,826 sq ft in Namibia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Monaco and Namibia are ranked 1st and 195th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Monaco has 0.0005% of the world's population and 0.000001% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.04% of the population and 0.55% of the land area for Namibia, hence the population density in Monaco is 503,551% higher than in Namibia.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 48,010 ppl/mi² | 9.53 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 1/197 | 195/197 |
| Population |
38341
|
3141364
|
| Land area | 0.8 sq mi | 317,874 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 581 sq ft | 2,924,567 sq ft |
| Rural population | 0% | 44.2% |
| Urban population | 100% | 55.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Monaco vs Namibia:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Monaco increased by 16.3%, compared to a 56% growth in Namibia.
In 2004, Monaco ranked 1st for population density and is in 1st place still. Namibia was 191st in 2004 and ranks 195th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 48,010 | 9.53 |
| 2023 | 48,414 | 9.32 |
| 2022 | 48,383 | 9.09 |
| 2021 | 47,881 | 8.84 |
| 2020 | 48,618 | 8.58 |
| 2019 | 48,694 | 8.34 |
| 2018 | 48,751 | 8.11 |
| 2017 | 48,143 | 7.89 |
| 2016 | 47,629 | 7.67 |
| 2015 | 46,966 | 7.47 |
| 2014 | 46,162 | 7.27 |
| 2013 | 45,292 | 7.09 |
| 2012 | 44,352 | 6.9 |
| 2011 | 43,374 | 6.75 |
| 2010 | 42,374 | 6.64 |
| 2009 | 41,353 | 6.54 |
| 2008 | 40,678 | 6.44 |
| 2007 | 40,680 | 6.35 |
| 2006 | 40,961 | 6.27 |
| 2005 | 41,156 | 6.19 |
| 2004 | 41,280 | 6.11 |
| 2003 | 41,366 | 6.03 |
| 2002 | 41,427 | 5.95 |
| 2001 | 41,459 | 5.84 |
| 2000 | 41,469 | 5.72 |
| 1999 | 41,412 | 5.59 |
| 1998 | 41,229 | 5.45 |
| 1997 | 40,968 | 5.31 |
| 1996 | 40,680 | 5.18 |
| 1995 | 40,388 | 5.04 |
| 1994 | 40,089 | 4.9 |
| 1993 | 39,784 | 4.75 |
| 1992 | 39,466 | 4.6 |
| 1991 | 39,131 | 4.45 |
| 1990 | 38,790 | 4.31 |
| 1989 | 38,440 | 4.05 |
| 1988 | 38,053 | 3.81 |
| 1987 | 37,624 | 3.67 |
| 1986 | 37,173 | 3.56 |
| 1985 | 36,711 | 3.45 |
| 1984 | 36,232 | 3.35 |
| 1983 | 35,726 | 3.26 |
| 1982 | 35,216 | 3.18 |
| 1981 | 34,873 | 3.12 |
| 1980 | 34,655 | 3.09 |
| 1979 | 34,361 | 3.03 |
| 1978 | 33,994 | 2.98 |
| 1977 | 33,570 | 2.93 |
| 1976 | 33,087 | 2.85 |
| 1975 | 32,582 | 2.77 |
| 1974 | 32,244 | 2.69 |
| 1973 | 32,036 | 2.61 |
| 1972 | 31,767 | 2.53 |
| 1971 | 31,402 | 2.46 |
| 1970 | 30,958 | 2.38 |
| 1969 | 30,450 | 2.32 |
| 1968 | 29,946 | 2.25 |
| 1967 | 29,682 | 2.19 |
| 1966 | 29,556 | 2.13 |
| 1965 | 29,313 | 2.08 |
| 1964 | 28,987 | 2.03 |
| 1963 | 28,602 | 1.98 |
| 1962 | 28,210 | 1.94 |
| 1961 | 27,984 | 1.9 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 100% | 55.8% |
| 2023 | 100% | 54.9% |
| 2022 | 100% | 54% |
| 2021 | 100% | 53% |
| 2020 | 100% | 52% |
| 2019 | 100% | 51% |
| 2018 | 100% | 50% |
| 2017 | 100% | 49% |
| 2016 | 100% | 48% |
| 2015 | 100% | 46.9% |
| 2014 | 100% | 45.8% |
| 2013 | 100% | 44.8% |
| 2012 | 100% | 43.7% |
| 2011 | 100% | 42.6% |
| 2010 | 100% | 41.6% |
| 2009 | 100% | 40.6% |
| 2008 | 100% | 39.6% |
| 2007 | 100% | 38.6% |
| 2006 | 100% | 37.6% |
| 2005 | 100% | 36.6% |
| 2004 | 100% | 35.7% |
| 2003 | 100% | 34.7% |
| 2002 | 100% | 33.8% |
| 2001 | 100% | 32.9% |
| 2000 | 100% | 32.4% |
| 1999 | 100% | 31.9% |
| 1998 | 100% | 31.3% |
| 1997 | 100% | 30.8% |
| 1996 | 100% | 30.3% |
| 1995 | 100% | 29.8% |
| 1994 | 100% | 29.3% |
| 1993 | 100% | 28.8% |
| 1992 | 100% | 28.3% |
| 1991 | 100% | 27.9% |
| 1990 | 100% | 27.7% |
| 1989 | 100% | 27.4% |
| 1988 | 100% | 27.1% |
| 1987 | 100% | 26.9% |
| 1986 | 100% | 26.6% |
| 1985 | 100% | 26.4% |
| 1984 | 100% | 26.1% |
| 1983 | 100% | 25.9% |
| 1982 | 100% | 25.6% |
| 1981 | 100% | 25.4% |
| 1980 | 100% | 25.1% |
| 1979 | 100% | 24.8% |
| 1978 | 100% | 24.5% |
| 1977 | 100% | 24.2% |
| 1976 | 100% | 23.9% |
| 1975 | 100% | 23.7% |
| 1974 | 100% | 23.4% |
| 1973 | 100% | 23.1% |
| 1972 | 100% | 22.8% |
| 1971 | 100% | 22.6% |
| 1970 | 100% | 22.3% |
| 1969 | 100% | 21.9% |
| 1968 | 100% | 21.4% |
| 1967 | 100% | 20.9% |
| 1966 | 100% | 20.5% |
| 1965 | 100% | 20% |
| 1964 | 100% | 19.6% |
| 1963 | 100% | 19.2% |
| 1962 | 100% | 18.7% |
| 1961 | 100% | 18.3% |
| 1960 | 100% | 17.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 100% to 100% in Monaco and from 35.7% to 55.8% in Namibia.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Windhoek | 431K |
| Walvis Bay | 103K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons