Argentina has a population density of 43.2 people per square mile compared to 48 people in Finland. Argentina has 654,934 sq ft of land per person vs 646,303 sq ft in Finland. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Argentina and Finland are ranked 178th and 173rd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Argentina has 0.56% of the world's population and 1.84% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.07% of the population and 0.2% of the land area for Finland, hence the population density in Argentina is 9.97% lower than in Finland.
Population density comparison
Argentina
|
Finland
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 43.2 ppl/mi² | 48 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 178/197 | 173/197 |
| Population |
45973765
|
5643254
|
| Land area | 1,056,642 sq mi | 117,360 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 644,638 sq ft | 580,393 sq ft |
| Rural population | 7.42% | 14.1% |
| Urban population | 92.6% | 85.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 12.4% | 0% |
Argentina vs Finland:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Argentina increased by 17.7%, compared to a 8.05% growth in Finland.
In 2004, Argentina ranked 165th for population density and is in 178th place now. Finland was 157th in 2004 and ranks 173rd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Argentina
|
Finland
|
|
| 2024 | 43.2 | 48 |
| 2023 | 43.1 | 47.6 |
| 2022 | 43 | 47.3 |
| 2021 | 42.9 | 47.2 |
| 2020 | 42.8 | 47.1 |
| 2019 | 42.6 | 47.1 |
| 2018 | 42.3 | 47 |
| 2017 | 41.9 | 46.9 |
| 2016 | 41.5 | 46.8 |
| 2015 | 41.1 | 46.7 |
| 2014 | 40.7 | 46.5 |
| 2013 | 40.3 | 46.4 |
| 2012 | 39.9 | 46.1 |
| 2011 | 39.5 | 45.9 |
| 2010 | 39.1 | 45.7 |
| 2009 | 38.7 | 45.5 |
| 2008 | 38.3 | 45.3 |
| 2007 | 37.9 | 45 |
| 2006 | 37.5 | 44.9 |
| 2005 | 37.1 | 44.6 |
| 2004 | 36.7 | 44.5 |
| 2003 | 36.4 | 44.3 |
| 2002 | 36 | 44.2 |
| 2001 | 35.6 | 44.1 |
| 2000 | 35.2 | 44 |
| 1999 | 34.8 | 43.9 |
| 1998 | 34.4 | 43.8 |
| 1997 | 34 | 43.7 |
| 1996 | 33.6 | 43.6 |
| 1995 | 33.2 | 43.4 |
| 1994 | 32.8 | 43.3 |
| 1993 | 32.3 | 43.1 |
| 1992 | 31.9 | 42.9 |
| 1991 | 31.4 | 42.6 |
| 1990 | 31 | 42.4 |
| 1989 | 30.5 | 42.2 |
| 1988 | 30.1 | 42.1 |
| 1987 | 29.6 | 41.9 |
| 1986 | 29.2 | 41.8 |
| 1985 | 28.7 | 41.7 |
| 1984 | 28.3 | 41.5 |
| 1983 | 27.8 | 41.3 |
| 1982 | 27.4 | 41 |
| 1981 | 26.9 | 40.8 |
| 1980 | 26.5 | 40.6 |
| 1979 | 26.1 | 40.5 |
| 1978 | 25.7 | 40.4 |
| 1977 | 25.3 | 40.3 |
| 1976 | 24.9 | 40.2 |
| 1975 | 24.5 | 40.1 |
| 1974 | 24.1 | 39.9 |
| 1973 | 23.7 | 39.7 |
| 1972 | 23.3 | 39.5 |
| 1971 | 23 | 39.2 |
| 1970 | 22.6 | 39.2 |
| 1969 | 22.2 | 39.3 |
| 1968 | 21.9 | 39.3 |
| 1967 | 21.6 | 39.2 |
| 1966 | 21.3 | 39 |
| 1965 | 20.9 | 38.8 |
| 1964 | 20.6 | 38.7 |
| 1963 | 20.3 | 38.5 |
| 1962 | 19.9 | 38.2 |
| 1961 | 19.6 | 37.9 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Argentina
|
Finland
|
|
| 2024 | 92.6% | 85.9% |
| 2023 | 92.5% | 85.8% |
| 2022 | 92.3% | 85.7% |
| 2021 | 92.2% | 85.6% |
| 2020 | 92.1% | 85.5% |
| 2019 | 92% | 85.4% |
| 2018 | 91.9% | 85.4% |
| 2017 | 91.7% | 85.3% |
| 2016 | 91.6% | 85.3% |
| 2015 | 91.5% | 85.2% |
| 2014 | 91.4% | 85.2% |
| 2013 | 91.2% | 85.1% |
| 2012 | 91.1% | 84.8% |
| 2011 | 91% | 84.3% |
| 2010 | 90.8% | 83.8% |
| 2009 | 90.7% | 83.4% |
| 2008 | 90.5% | 83.3% |
| 2007 | 90.4% | 83.2% |
| 2006 | 90.2% | 83% |
| 2005 | 90% | 82.9% |
| 2004 | 89.9% | 82.8% |
| 2003 | 89.7% | 82.6% |
| 2002 | 89.5% | 82.5% |
| 2001 | 89.3% | 82.4% |
| 2000 | 89.1% | 82.2% |
| 1999 | 89% | 81.9% |
| 1998 | 88.8% | 81.7% |
| 1997 | 88.6% | 81.5% |
| 1996 | 88.4% | 81.2% |
| 1995 | 88.2% | 81% |
| 1994 | 88% | 80.7% |
| 1993 | 87.8% | 80.4% |
| 1992 | 87.5% | 80.1% |
| 1991 | 87.3% | 79.8% |
| 1990 | 87% | 79.4% |
| 1989 | 86.6% | 78.7% |
| 1988 | 86.2% | 78% |
| 1987 | 85.8% | 77.3% |
| 1986 | 85.4% | 76.6% |
| 1985 | 85% | 75.8% |
| 1984 | 84.6% | 75% |
| 1983 | 84.2% | 74.2% |
| 1982 | 83.8% | 73.4% |
| 1981 | 83.3% | 72.5% |
| 1980 | 82.9% | 71.7% |
| 1979 | 82.5% | 71% |
| 1978 | 82.1% | 70.2% |
| 1977 | 81.8% | 69.4% |
| 1976 | 81.4% | 68.6% |
| 1975 | 81% | 67.8% |
| 1974 | 80.6% | 67% |
| 1973 | 80.2% | 66.2% |
| 1972 | 79.7% | 65.4% |
| 1971 | 79.3% | 64.5% |
| 1970 | 78.9% | 63.7% |
| 1969 | 78.4% | 62.9% |
| 1968 | 77.9% | 62.1% |
| 1967 | 77.4% | 61.3% |
| 1966 | 76.9% | 60.5% |
| 1965 | 76.4% | 59.7% |
| 1964 | 75.8% | 58.8% |
| 1963 | 75.3% | 58% |
| 1962 | 74.8% | 57.2% |
| 1961 | 74.2% | 56.3% |
| 1960 | 73.6% | 55.3% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 89.9% to 92.6% in Argentina and from 82.8% to 85.9% in Finland.
Densely populated cities
|
Argentina
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Buenos Aires | 3.12M |
| Cordoba | 1.33M |
| Rosario | 1.19M |
| San Miguel de Tucuman | 606K |
| Mar del Plata | 593K |
| Salta | 535K |
| San Juan | 471K |
| Lanus | 459K |
| Santiago del Estero | 430K |
| Santa Fe | 406K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
