Argentina has a population density of 43.2 people per square mile compared to 19.8 people in Kazakhstan. Argentina has 654,934 sq ft of land per person vs 1,424,328 sq ft in Kazakhstan. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Argentina and Kazakhstan are ranked 178th and 187th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Argentina has 0.56% of the world's population and 1.84% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.25% of the population and 1.81% of the land area for Kazakhstan, hence the population density in Argentina is 118.9% higher than in Kazakhstan.
Population density comparison
Argentina
|
Kazakhstan
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 43.2 ppl/mi² | 19.8 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 178/197 | 187/197 |
| Population |
45973765
|
21036432
|
| Land area | 1,056,642 sq mi | 1,042,360 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 644,638 sq ft | 1,411,156 sq ft |
| Rural population | 7.42% | 41.6% |
| Urban population | 92.6% | 58.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 12.4% | 21.8% |
Argentina vs Kazakhstan:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Argentina increased by 17.7%, compared to a 29.9% growth in Kazakhstan.
In 2004, Argentina ranked 165th for population density and is in 178th place now. Kazakhstan was 181st in 2004 and ranks 187th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Argentina
|
Kazakhstan
|
|
| 2024 | 43.2 | 19.8 |
| 2023 | 43.1 | 19.5 |
| 2022 | 43 | 19.2 |
| 2021 | 42.9 | 18.9 |
| 2020 | 42.8 | 18.7 |
| 2019 | 42.6 | 18.4 |
| 2018 | 42.3 | 18.2 |
| 2017 | 41.9 | 17.9 |
| 2016 | 41.5 | 17.6 |
| 2015 | 41.1 | 17.3 |
| 2014 | 40.7 | 17.1 |
| 2013 | 40.3 | 16.8 |
| 2012 | 39.9 | 16.6 |
| 2011 | 39.5 | 16.4 |
| 2010 | 39.1 | 16.2 |
| 2009 | 38.7 | 15.9 |
| 2008 | 38.3 | 15.8 |
| 2007 | 37.9 | 15.6 |
| 2006 | 37.5 | 15.4 |
| 2005 | 37.1 | 15.3 |
| 2004 | 36.7 | 15.2 |
| 2003 | 36.4 | 15.1 |
| 2002 | 36 | 15 |
| 2001 | 35.6 | 14.9 |
| 2000 | 35.2 | 14.9 |
| 1999 | 34.8 | 14.8 |
| 1998 | 34.4 | 15 |
| 1997 | 34 | 15.4 |
| 1996 | 33.6 | 15.7 |
| 1995 | 33.2 | 16.1 |
| 1994 | 32.8 | 16.4 |
| 1993 | 32.3 | 16.6 |
| 1992 | 31.9 | 16.6 |
| 1991 | 31.4 | - |
| 1990 | 31 | - |
| 1989 | 30.5 | - |
| 1988 | 30.1 | - |
| 1987 | 29.6 | - |
| 1986 | 29.2 | - |
| 1985 | 28.7 | - |
| 1984 | 28.3 | - |
| 1983 | 27.8 | - |
| 1982 | 27.4 | - |
| 1981 | 26.9 | - |
| 1980 | 26.5 | - |
| 1979 | 26.1 | - |
| 1978 | 25.7 | - |
| 1977 | 25.3 | - |
| 1976 | 24.9 | - |
| 1975 | 24.5 | - |
| 1974 | 24.1 | - |
| 1973 | 23.7 | - |
| 1972 | 23.3 | - |
| 1971 | 23 | - |
| 1970 | 22.6 | - |
| 1969 | 22.2 | - |
| 1968 | 21.9 | - |
| 1967 | 21.6 | - |
| 1966 | 21.3 | - |
| 1965 | 20.9 | - |
| 1964 | 20.6 | - |
| 1963 | 20.3 | - |
| 1962 | 19.9 | - |
| 1961 | 19.6 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Argentina
|
Kazakhstan
|
|
| 2024 | 92.6% | 58.4% |
| 2023 | 92.5% | 58.2% |
| 2022 | 92.3% | 58% |
| 2021 | 92.2% | 57.8% |
| 2020 | 92.1% | 57.7% |
| 2019 | 92% | 57.5% |
| 2018 | 91.9% | 57.4% |
| 2017 | 91.7% | 57.3% |
| 2016 | 91.6% | 57.3% |
| 2015 | 91.5% | 57.2% |
| 2014 | 91.4% | 57.1% |
| 2013 | 91.2% | 57% |
| 2012 | 91.1% | 57% |
| 2011 | 91% | 56.9% |
| 2010 | 90.8% | 56.8% |
| 2009 | 90.7% | 56.8% |
| 2008 | 90.5% | 56.7% |
| 2007 | 90.4% | 56.6% |
| 2006 | 90.2% | 56.5% |
| 2005 | 90% | 56.5% |
| 2004 | 89.9% | 56.4% |
| 2003 | 89.7% | 56.3% |
| 2002 | 89.5% | 56.2% |
| 2001 | 89.3% | 56.2% |
| 2000 | 89.1% | 56.1% |
| 1999 | 89% | 56% |
| 1998 | 88.8% | 56% |
| 1997 | 88.6% | 56% |
| 1996 | 88.4% | 55.9% |
| 1995 | 88.2% | 55.9% |
| 1994 | 88% | 55.9% |
| 1993 | 87.8% | 56% |
| 1992 | 87.5% | 56.1% |
| 1991 | 87.3% | 56.2% |
| 1990 | 87% | 56.3% |
| 1989 | 86.6% | 56.4% |
| 1988 | 86.2% | 56.3% |
| 1987 | 85.8% | 56.2% |
| 1986 | 85.4% | 56.1% |
| 1985 | 85% | 56% |
| 1984 | 84.6% | 55.9% |
| 1983 | 84.2% | 55.5% |
| 1982 | 83.8% | 55% |
| 1981 | 83.3% | 54.6% |
| 1980 | 82.9% | 54.1% |
| 1979 | 82.5% | 53.7% |
| 1978 | 82.1% | 53.4% |
| 1977 | 81.8% | 53.1% |
| 1976 | 81.4% | 52.8% |
| 1975 | 81% | 52.6% |
| 1974 | 80.6% | 52.3% |
| 1973 | 80.2% | 51.8% |
| 1972 | 79.7% | 51.3% |
| 1971 | 79.3% | 50.8% |
| 1970 | 78.9% | 50.2% |
| 1969 | 78.4% | 49.6% |
| 1968 | 77.9% | 49% |
| 1967 | 77.4% | 48.3% |
| 1966 | 76.9% | 47.7% |
| 1965 | 76.4% | 47% |
| 1964 | 75.8% | 46.4% |
| 1963 | 75.3% | 45.8% |
| 1962 | 74.8% | 45.3% |
| 1961 | 74.2% | 44.7% |
| 1960 | 73.6% | 44.2% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 89.9% to 92.6% in Argentina and from 56.4% to 58.4% in Kazakhstan.
Densely populated cities
|
Argentina
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Buenos Aires | 3.12M |
| Cordoba | 1.33M |
| Rosario | 1.19M |
| San Miguel de Tucuman | 606K |
| Mar del Plata | 593K |
| Salta | 535K |
| San Juan | 471K |
| Lanus | 459K |
| Santiago del Estero | 430K |
| Santa Fe | 406K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
