Antigua and Barbuda has a population density of 552 people per square mile compared to 43.2 people in Argentina. Antigua and Barbuda has 50,540 sq ft of land per person vs 654,934 sq ft in Argentina. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Antigua and Barbuda and Argentina are ranked 53rd and 178th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Antigua and Barbuda has 0.001% of the world's population and 0.0003% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.56% of the population and 1.84% of the land area for Argentina, hence the population density in Antigua and Barbuda is 1,176% higher than in Argentina.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 552 ppl/mi² | 43.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 53/197 | 178/197 |
| Population |
94540
|
45973765
|
| Land area | 169.9 sq mi | 1,056,642 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 50,507 sq ft | 644,638 sq ft |
| Rural population | 75.7% | 7.42% |
| Urban population | 24.3% | 92.6% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 12.4% |
Antigua and Barbuda vs Argentina:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Antigua and Barbuda increased by 19.1%, compared to a 17.7% growth in Argentina.
In 2004, Antigua and Barbuda ranked 47th for population density and is in 53rd place now. Argentina was 165th in 2004 and ranks 178th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 552 | 43.2 |
| 2023 | 549 | 43.1 |
| 2022 | 546 | 43 |
| 2021 | 544 | 42.9 |
| 2020 | 541 | 42.8 |
| 2019 | 538 | 42.6 |
| 2018 | 535 | 42.3 |
| 2017 | 533 | 41.9 |
| 2016 | 530 | 41.5 |
| 2015 | 526 | 41.1 |
| 2014 | 523 | 40.7 |
| 2013 | 518 | 40.3 |
| 2012 | 514 | 39.9 |
| 2011 | 508 | 39.5 |
| 2010 | 502 | 39.1 |
| 2009 | 495 | 38.7 |
| 2008 | 488 | 38.3 |
| 2007 | 481 | 37.9 |
| 2006 | 474 | 37.5 |
| 2005 | 469 | 37.1 |
| 2004 | 463 | 36.7 |
| 2003 | 458 | 36.4 |
| 2002 | 453 | 36 |
| 2001 | 448 | 35.6 |
| 2000 | 441 | 35.2 |
| 1999 | 434 | 34.8 |
| 1998 | 426 | 34.4 |
| 1997 | 418 | 34 |
| 1996 | 410 | 33.6 |
| 1995 | 401 | 33.2 |
| 1994 | 393 | 32.8 |
| 1993 | 386 | 32.3 |
| 1992 | 379 | 31.9 |
| 1991 | 373 | 31.4 |
| 1990 | 371 | 31 |
| 1989 | 373 | 30.5 |
| 1988 | 375 | 30.1 |
| 1987 | 376 | 29.6 |
| 1986 | 378 | 29.2 |
| 1985 | 380 | 28.7 |
| 1984 | 382 | 28.3 |
| 1983 | 382 | 27.8 |
| 1982 | 381 | 27.4 |
| 1981 | 381 | 26.9 |
| 1980 | 380 | 26.5 |
| 1979 | 378 | 26.1 |
| 1978 | 377 | 25.7 |
| 1977 | 376 | 25.3 |
| 1976 | 375 | 24.9 |
| 1975 | 376 | 24.5 |
| 1974 | 377 | 24.1 |
| 1973 | 379 | 23.7 |
| 1972 | 380 | 23.3 |
| 1971 | 381 | 23 |
| 1970 | 380 | 22.6 |
| 1969 | 376 | 22.2 |
| 1968 | 370 | 21.9 |
| 1967 | 364 | 21.6 |
| 1966 | 358 | 21.3 |
| 1965 | 353 | 20.9 |
| 1964 | 347 | 20.6 |
| 1963 | 342 | 20.3 |
| 1962 | 337 | 19.9 |
| 1961 | 333 | 19.6 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 24.3% | 92.6% |
| 2023 | 24.3% | 92.5% |
| 2022 | 24.3% | 92.3% |
| 2021 | 24.4% | 92.2% |
| 2020 | 24.4% | 92.1% |
| 2019 | 24.5% | 92% |
| 2018 | 24.6% | 91.9% |
| 2017 | 24.7% | 91.7% |
| 2016 | 24.8% | 91.6% |
| 2015 | 25% | 91.5% |
| 2014 | 25.2% | 91.4% |
| 2013 | 25.3% | 91.2% |
| 2012 | 25.5% | 91.1% |
| 2011 | 25.7% | 91% |
| 2010 | 26.2% | 90.8% |
| 2009 | 26.8% | 90.7% |
| 2008 | 27.4% | 90.5% |
| 2007 | 28% | 90.4% |
| 2006 | 28.6% | 90.2% |
| 2005 | 29.2% | 90% |
| 2004 | 29.8% | 89.9% |
| 2003 | 30.5% | 89.7% |
| 2002 | 31.1% | 89.5% |
| 2001 | 31.7% | 89.3% |
| 2000 | 32.1% | 89.1% |
| 1999 | 32.5% | 89% |
| 1998 | 32.9% | 88.8% |
| 1997 | 33.2% | 88.6% |
| 1996 | 33.6% | 88.4% |
| 1995 | 34% | 88.2% |
| 1994 | 34.3% | 88% |
| 1993 | 34.7% | 87.8% |
| 1992 | 35.1% | 87.5% |
| 1991 | 35.5% | 87.3% |
| 1990 | 35.4% | 87% |
| 1989 | 35.3% | 86.6% |
| 1988 | 35.3% | 86.2% |
| 1987 | 35.2% | 85.8% |
| 1986 | 35.1% | 85.4% |
| 1985 | 35% | 85% |
| 1984 | 34.9% | 84.6% |
| 1983 | 34.9% | 84.2% |
| 1982 | 34.8% | 83.8% |
| 1981 | 34.7% | 83.3% |
| 1980 | 34.6% | 82.9% |
| 1979 | 34.5% | 82.5% |
| 1978 | 34.5% | 82.1% |
| 1977 | 34.4% | 81.8% |
| 1976 | 34.3% | 81.4% |
| 1975 | 34.2% | 81% |
| 1974 | 34.1% | 80.6% |
| 1973 | 34.1% | 80.2% |
| 1972 | 34% | 79.7% |
| 1971 | 33.9% | 79.3% |
| 1970 | 33.8% | 78.9% |
| 1969 | 34.2% | 78.4% |
| 1968 | 34.8% | 77.9% |
| 1967 | 35.4% | 77.4% |
| 1966 | 36% | 76.9% |
| 1965 | 36.6% | 76.4% |
| 1964 | 37.2% | 75.8% |
| 1963 | 37.8% | 75.3% |
| 1962 | 38.4% | 74.8% |
| 1961 | 39% | 74.2% |
| 1960 | 39.7% | 73.6% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 29.8% to 24.3% in Antigua and Barbuda and from 89.9% to 92.6% in Argentina.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Buenos Aires | 3.12M |
| Cordoba | 1.33M |
| Rosario | 1.19M |
| San Miguel de Tucuman | 606K |
| Mar del Plata | 593K |
| Salta | 535K |
| San Juan | 471K |
| Lanus | 459K |
| Santiago del Estero | 430K |
| Santa Fe | 406K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons