Argentina has a population density of 43.2 people per square mile compared to 52.5 people in New Zealand. Argentina has 654,934 sq ft of land per person vs 540,405 sq ft in New Zealand. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Argentina and New Zealand are ranked 178th and 168th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Argentina has 0.56% of the world's population and 1.84% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.07% of the population and 0.18% of the land area for New Zealand, hence the population density in Argentina is 17.6% lower than in New Zealand.
Population density comparison
Argentina
|
New Zealand
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 43.2 ppl/mi² | 52.5 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 178/197 | 168/197 |
| Population |
45973765
|
5406623
|
| Land area | 1,056,642 sq mi | 101,665 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 644,638 sq ft | 530,907 sq ft |
| Rural population | 7.42% | 12.9% |
| Urban population | 92.6% | 87.1% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 12.4% | 27.5% |
Argentina vs New Zealand:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Argentina increased by 17.7%, compared to a 30.6% growth in New Zealand.
In 2004, Argentina ranked 165th for population density and is in 178th place now. New Zealand was 162nd in 2004 and ranks 168th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Argentina
|
New Zealand
|
|
| 2024 | 43.2 | 52.5 |
| 2023 | 43.1 | 51.6 |
| 2022 | 43 | 50.3 |
| 2021 | 42.9 | 50.3 |
| 2020 | 42.8 | 50.1 |
| 2019 | 42.6 | 49 |
| 2018 | 42.3 | 48.2 |
| 2017 | 41.9 | 47.3 |
| 2016 | 41.5 | 46.4 |
| 2015 | 41.1 | 45.3 |
| 2014 | 40.7 | 44.4 |
| 2013 | 40.3 | 43.7 |
| 2012 | 39.9 | 43.4 |
| 2011 | 39.5 | 43.1 |
| 2010 | 39.1 | 42.8 |
| 2009 | 38.7 | 42.3 |
| 2008 | 38.3 | 41.9 |
| 2007 | 37.9 | 41.5 |
| 2006 | 37.5 | 41.2 |
| 2005 | 37.1 | 40.7 |
| 2004 | 36.7 | 40.2 |
| 2003 | 36.4 | 39.6 |
| 2002 | 36 | 38.8 |
| 2001 | 35.6 | 38.2 |
| 2000 | 35.2 | 37.9 |
| 1999 | 34.8 | 37.7 |
| 1998 | 34.4 | 37.5 |
| 1997 | 34 | 37.2 |
| 1996 | 33.6 | 36.7 |
| 1995 | 33.2 | 36.1 |
| 1994 | 32.8 | 35.6 |
| 1993 | 32.3 | 35.1 |
| 1992 | 31.9 | 34.7 |
| 1991 | 31.4 | 34.4 |
| 1990 | 31 | 32.8 |
| 1989 | 30.5 | 32.5 |
| 1988 | 30.1 | 32.3 |
| 1987 | 29.6 | 32.2 |
| 1986 | 29.2 | 31.9 |
| 1985 | 28.7 | 31.9 |
| 1984 | 28.3 | 31.7 |
| 1983 | 27.8 | 31.5 |
| 1982 | 27.4 | 31 |
| 1981 | 26.9 | 30.7 |
| 1980 | 26.5 | 30.6 |
| 1979 | 26.1 | 30.6 |
| 1978 | 25.7 | 30.7 |
| 1977 | 25.3 | 30.7 |
| 1976 | 24.9 | 30.6 |
| 1975 | 24.5 | 30.3 |
| 1974 | 24.1 | 29.7 |
| 1973 | 23.7 | 29.1 |
| 1972 | 23.3 | 28.6 |
| 1971 | 23 | 28.1 |
| 1970 | 22.6 | 27.6 |
| 1969 | 22.2 | 27.3 |
| 1968 | 21.9 | 27 |
| 1967 | 21.6 | 26.8 |
| 1966 | 21.3 | 26.3 |
| 1965 | 20.9 | 25.9 |
| 1964 | 20.6 | 25.4 |
| 1963 | 20.3 | 24.9 |
| 1962 | 19.9 | 24.4 |
| 1961 | 19.6 | 23.8 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Argentina
|
New Zealand
|
|
| 2024 | 92.6% | 87.1% |
| 2023 | 92.5% | 87% |
| 2022 | 92.3% | 86.9% |
| 2021 | 92.2% | 86.8% |
| 2020 | 92.1% | 86.7% |
| 2019 | 92% | 86.6% |
| 2018 | 91.9% | 86.5% |
| 2017 | 91.7% | 86.5% |
| 2016 | 91.6% | 86.4% |
| 2015 | 91.5% | 86.3% |
| 2014 | 91.4% | 86.3% |
| 2013 | 91.2% | 86.2% |
| 2012 | 91.1% | 86.2% |
| 2011 | 91% | 86.1% |
| 2010 | 90.8% | 86.2% |
| 2009 | 90.7% | 86.2% |
| 2008 | 90.5% | 86.3% |
| 2007 | 90.4% | 86.3% |
| 2006 | 90.2% | 86.4% |
| 2005 | 90% | 86.3% |
| 2004 | 89.9% | 86.3% |
| 2003 | 89.7% | 86.2% |
| 2002 | 89.5% | 86.2% |
| 2001 | 89.3% | 86.1% |
| 2000 | 89.1% | 86% |
| 1999 | 89% | 85.9% |
| 1998 | 88.8% | 85.9% |
| 1997 | 88.6% | 85.8% |
| 1996 | 88.4% | 85.7% |
| 1995 | 88.2% | 85.6% |
| 1994 | 88% | 85.4% |
| 1993 | 87.8% | 85.3% |
| 1992 | 87.5% | 85.1% |
| 1991 | 87.3% | 84.9% |
| 1990 | 87% | 84.7% |
| 1989 | 86.6% | 84.5% |
| 1988 | 86.2% | 84.3% |
| 1987 | 85.8% | 84% |
| 1986 | 85.4% | 83.8% |
| 1985 | 85% | 83.7% |
| 1984 | 84.6% | 83.6% |
| 1983 | 84.2% | 83.6% |
| 1982 | 83.8% | 83.6% |
| 1981 | 83.3% | 83.5% |
| 1980 | 82.9% | 83.4% |
| 1979 | 82.5% | 83.3% |
| 1978 | 82.1% | 83.2% |
| 1977 | 81.8% | 83.1% |
| 1976 | 81.4% | 83% |
| 1975 | 81% | 82.8% |
| 1974 | 80.6% | 82.5% |
| 1973 | 80.2% | 82.1% |
| 1972 | 79.7% | 81.8% |
| 1971 | 79.3% | 81.5% |
| 1970 | 78.9% | 81.1% |
| 1969 | 78.4% | 80.7% |
| 1968 | 77.9% | 80.3% |
| 1967 | 77.4% | 79.9% |
| 1966 | 76.9% | 79.4% |
| 1965 | 76.4% | 78.9% |
| 1964 | 75.8% | 78.3% |
| 1963 | 75.3% | 77.7% |
| 1962 | 74.8% | 77.1% |
| 1961 | 74.2% | 76.5% |
| 1960 | 73.6% | 76% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 89.9% to 92.6% in Argentina and from 86.3% to 87.1% in New Zealand.
Densely populated cities
|
Argentina
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Buenos Aires | 3.12M |
| Cordoba | 1.33M |
| Rosario | 1.19M |
| San Miguel de Tucuman | 606K |
| Mar del Plata | 593K |
| Salta | 535K |
| San Juan | 471K |
| Lanus | 459K |
| Santiago del Estero | 430K |
| Santa Fe | 406K |
|
New Zealand
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Auckland | 1.47M |
| Christchurch | 383K |
| Wellington | 216K |
| Hamilton | 176K |
| Tauranga | 151K |
| Dunedin | 106K |
| Lower Hutt | 103K |
| Palmerston North | 81.5K |
| Napier | 66.3K |
| Porirua | 59.6K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
