Bosnia and Herzegovina has a population density of 160.1 people per square mile compared to 41.3 people in Turkmenistan. Bosnia and Herzegovina has 174,158 sq ft of land per person vs 705,496 sq ft in Turkmenistan. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Turkmenistan are ranked 126th and 181st, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Bosnia and Herzegovina has 0.04% of the world's population and 0.03% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.09% of the population and 0.32% of the land area for Turkmenistan, hence the population density in Bosnia and Herzegovina is 287.5% higher than in Turkmenistan.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 160.1 ppl/mi² | 41.3 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 126/197 | 181/197 |
| Population |
3140094
|
7713465
|
| Land area | 19,768 sq mi | 181,441 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 174,168 sq ft | 674,933 sq ft |
| Rural population | 49.3% | 45.5% |
| Urban population | 50.7% | 54.5% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 13.7% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Turkmenistan:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Bosnia and Herzegovina decreased by 23.6%, compared to a 51.2% growth in Turkmenistan.
In 2004, Bosnia and Herzegovina ranked 89th for population density and is in 126th place now. Turkmenistan was 172nd in 2004 and ranks 181st out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 160.1 | 41.3 |
| 2023 | 161.1 | 40.6 |
| 2022 | 162.1 | 39.8 |
| 2021 | 164.1 | 39.1 |
| 2020 | 166.9 | 38.3 |
| 2019 | 169.2 | 37.5 |
| 2018 | 171.3 | 36.7 |
| 2017 | 173.4 | 35.9 |
| 2016 | 175.7 | 35.1 |
| 2015 | 178 | 34.3 |
| 2014 | 180.3 | 33.5 |
| 2013 | 182.7 | 32.7 |
| 2012 | 185.7 | 32 |
| 2011 | 189.3 | 31.3 |
| 2010 | 192.8 | 30.7 |
| 2009 | 196.3 | 30 |
| 2008 | 199.7 | 29.5 |
| 2007 | 203 | 28.9 |
| 2006 | 205.5 | 28.4 |
| 2005 | 207.2 | 27.8 |
| 2004 | 209.5 | 27.3 |
| 2003 | 211.4 | 26.8 |
| 2002 | 211.9 | 26.3 |
| 2001 | 211.4 | 25.8 |
| 2000 | 210.4 | 25.3 |
| 1999 | 208.9 | 24.8 |
| 1998 | 206.9 | 24.3 |
| 1997 | 203.3 | 23.9 |
| 1996 | 196 | 23.5 |
| 1995 | 188 | 23.1 |
| 1994 | 188.5 | 22.7 |
| 1993 | 197.5 | 22.2 |
| 1992 | 214.2 | 21.7 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 50.7% | 54.5% |
| 2023 | 50.3% | 54% |
| 2022 | 49.8% | 53.5% |
| 2021 | 49.4% | 53% |
| 2020 | 49% | 52.5% |
| 2019 | 48.6% | 52% |
| 2018 | 48.2% | 51.6% |
| 2017 | 47.9% | 51.2% |
| 2016 | 47.5% | 50.7% |
| 2015 | 47.2% | 50.3% |
| 2014 | 46.8% | 49.9% |
| 2013 | 46.5% | 49.5% |
| 2012 | 46.2% | 49.2% |
| 2011 | 45.9% | 48.8% |
| 2010 | 45.6% | 48.5% |
| 2009 | 45.2% | 48.2% |
| 2008 | 44.9% | 47.9% |
| 2007 | 44.6% | 47.6% |
| 2006 | 44.3% | 47.3% |
| 2005 | 44% | 47.1% |
| 2004 | 43.6% | 46.8% |
| 2003 | 43.3% | 46.6% |
| 2002 | 43% | 46.4% |
| 2001 | 42.7% | 46.1% |
| 2000 | 42.4% | 45.9% |
| 1999 | 42.1% | 45.7% |
| 1998 | 41.8% | 45.5% |
| 1997 | 41.4% | 45.2% |
| 1996 | 41.1% | 45% |
| 1995 | 40.8% | 44.8% |
| 1994 | 40.5% | 44.7% |
| 1993 | 40.2% | 44.8% |
| 1992 | 39.9% | 44.9% |
| 1991 | 39.6% | 45% |
| 1990 | 39.2% | 45.1% |
| 1989 | 38.9% | 45.2% |
| 1988 | 38.6% | 45.3% |
| 1987 | 38.2% | 45.5% |
| 1986 | 37.9% | 45.8% |
| 1985 | 37.6% | 46% |
| 1984 | 37.3% | 46.2% |
| 1983 | 36.9% | 46.4% |
| 1982 | 36.6% | 46.6% |
| 1981 | 36.3% | 46.9% |
| 1980 | 35.5% | 47.1% |
| 1979 | 34.7% | 47.3% |
| 1978 | 33.8% | 47.4% |
| 1977 | 33% | 47.5% |
| 1976 | 32.1% | 47.5% |
| 1975 | 31.3% | 47.6% |
| 1974 | 30.5% | 47.6% |
| 1973 | 29.7% | 47.6% |
| 1972 | 28.9% | 47.7% |
| 1971 | 28.1% | 47.7% |
| 1970 | 27.2% | 47.8% |
| 1969 | 26.3% | 47.7% |
| 1968 | 25.4% | 47.6% |
| 1967 | 24.5% | 47.4% |
| 1966 | 23.7% | 47.3% |
| 1965 | 22.8% | 47.1% |
| 1964 | 22% | 47% |
| 1963 | 21.2% | 46.8% |
| 1962 | 20.4% | 46.7% |
| 1961 | 19.7% | 46.6% |
| 1960 | 19% | 46.4% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 43.6% to 50.7% in Bosnia and Herzegovina and from 46.8% to 54.5% in Turkmenistan.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Sarajevo | 276K |
| Banja Luka | 185K |
| Bijeljina | 115K |
| Tuzla | 111K |
| Zenica | 111K |
| Mostar | 105K |
| Prijedor | 89.4K |
| Doboj | 68.5K |
| Bihac | 56.3K |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Ashgabat | 1.03M |
| Turkmenabat | 231K |
| Dasoguz | 227K |
| Mary | 126K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons