The Dominican Republic has a population density of 614 people per square mile compared to 52.5 people in New Zealand. The Dominican Republic has 45,844 sq ft of land per person vs 540,405 sq ft in New Zealand. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, the Dominican Republic and New Zealand are ranked 49th and 168th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. The Dominican Republic has 0.14% of the world's population and 0.03% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.07% of the population and 0.18% of the land area for New Zealand, hence the population density in the Dominican Republic is 1,069% higher than in New Zealand.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 614 ppl/mi² | 52.5 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 49/197 | 168/197 |
| Population |
11591984
|
5406623
|
| Land area | 18,609 sq mi | 101,665 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 45,399 sq ft | 530,907 sq ft |
| Rural population | 15% | 12.9% |
| Urban population | 85% | 87.1% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 21.6% | 27.5% |
the Dominican Republic vs New Zealand:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in the Dominican Republic increased by 25.8%, compared to a 30.6% growth in New Zealand.
In 2004, the Dominican Republic ranked 43rd for population density and is in 49th place now. New Zealand was 162nd in 2004 and ranks 168th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 614 | 52.5 |
| 2023 | 609 | 51.6 |
| 2022 | 603 | 50.3 |
| 2021 | 598 | 50.3 |
| 2020 | 592 | 50.1 |
| 2019 | 585 | 49 |
| 2018 | 578 | 48.2 |
| 2017 | 572 | 47.3 |
| 2016 | 566 | 46.4 |
| 2015 | 559 | 45.3 |
| 2014 | 553 | 44.4 |
| 2013 | 547 | 43.7 |
| 2012 | 540 | 43.4 |
| 2011 | 533 | 43.1 |
| 2010 | 526 | 42.8 |
| 2009 | 520 | 42.3 |
| 2008 | 513 | 41.9 |
| 2007 | 507 | 41.5 |
| 2006 | 501 | 41.2 |
| 2005 | 495 | 40.7 |
| 2004 | 488 | 40.2 |
| 2003 | 481 | 39.6 |
| 2002 | 475 | 38.8 |
| 2001 | 468 | 38.2 |
| 2000 | 460 | 37.9 |
| 1999 | 453 | 37.7 |
| 1998 | 446 | 37.5 |
| 1997 | 438 | 37.2 |
| 1996 | 431 | 36.7 |
| 1995 | 423 | 36.1 |
| 1994 | 415 | 35.6 |
| 1993 | 407 | 35.1 |
| 1992 | 399 | 34.7 |
| 1991 | 391 | 34.4 |
| 1990 | 383 | 32.8 |
| 1989 | 375 | 32.5 |
| 1988 | 368 | 32.3 |
| 1987 | 360 | 32.2 |
| 1986 | 352 | 31.9 |
| 1985 | 345 | 31.9 |
| 1984 | 337 | 31.7 |
| 1983 | 330 | 31.5 |
| 1982 | 322 | 31 |
| 1981 | 315 | 30.7 |
| 1980 | 307 | 30.6 |
| 1979 | 299.7 | 30.6 |
| 1978 | 292.3 | 30.7 |
| 1977 | 285 | 30.7 |
| 1976 | 277.7 | 30.6 |
| 1975 | 270.6 | 30.3 |
| 1974 | 263.5 | 29.7 |
| 1973 | 256.4 | 29.1 |
| 1972 | 249.4 | 28.6 |
| 1971 | 242.6 | 28.1 |
| 1970 | 235.9 | 27.6 |
| 1969 | 229.3 | 27.3 |
| 1968 | 222.9 | 27 |
| 1967 | 216.5 | 26.8 |
| 1966 | 210.3 | 26.3 |
| 1965 | 204.2 | 25.9 |
| 1964 | 198.3 | 25.4 |
| 1963 | 192.4 | 24.9 |
| 1962 | 186.6 | 24.4 |
| 1961 | 180.8 | 23.8 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 85% | 87.1% |
| 2023 | 84.4% | 87% |
| 2022 | 83.8% | 86.9% |
| 2021 | 83.2% | 86.8% |
| 2020 | 82.5% | 86.7% |
| 2019 | 81.8% | 86.6% |
| 2018 | 81.1% | 86.5% |
| 2017 | 80.3% | 86.5% |
| 2016 | 79.4% | 86.4% |
| 2015 | 78.6% | 86.3% |
| 2014 | 77.7% | 86.3% |
| 2013 | 76.7% | 86.2% |
| 2012 | 75.8% | 86.2% |
| 2011 | 74.8% | 86.1% |
| 2010 | 73.8% | 86.2% |
| 2009 | 72.5% | 86.2% |
| 2008 | 71.3% | 86.3% |
| 2007 | 70% | 86.3% |
| 2006 | 68.7% | 86.4% |
| 2005 | 67.4% | 86.3% |
| 2004 | 66% | 86.3% |
| 2003 | 64.6% | 86.2% |
| 2002 | 63.4% | 86.2% |
| 2001 | 62.6% | 86.1% |
| 2000 | 61.8% | 86% |
| 1999 | 60.9% | 85.9% |
| 1998 | 60.1% | 85.9% |
| 1997 | 59.3% | 85.8% |
| 1996 | 58.4% | 85.7% |
| 1995 | 57.6% | 85.6% |
| 1994 | 56.8% | 85.4% |
| 1993 | 56% | 85.3% |
| 1992 | 55.8% | 85.1% |
| 1991 | 55.5% | 84.9% |
| 1990 | 55.2% | 84.7% |
| 1989 | 55% | 84.5% |
| 1988 | 54.7% | 84.3% |
| 1987 | 54.4% | 84% |
| 1986 | 54.1% | 83.8% |
| 1985 | 53.9% | 83.7% |
| 1984 | 53.6% | 83.6% |
| 1983 | 53.3% | 83.6% |
| 1982 | 53.1% | 83.6% |
| 1981 | 52.4% | 83.5% |
| 1980 | 51.3% | 83.4% |
| 1979 | 50.2% | 83.3% |
| 1978 | 49.1% | 83.2% |
| 1977 | 47.9% | 83.1% |
| 1976 | 46.8% | 83% |
| 1975 | 45.7% | 82.8% |
| 1974 | 44.6% | 82.5% |
| 1973 | 43.5% | 82.1% |
| 1972 | 42.4% | 81.8% |
| 1971 | 41.4% | 81.5% |
| 1970 | 40.3% | 81.1% |
| 1969 | 39.2% | 80.7% |
| 1968 | 38.2% | 80.3% |
| 1967 | 37.1% | 79.9% |
| 1966 | 36.1% | 79.4% |
| 1965 | 35.1% | 78.9% |
| 1964 | 34% | 78.3% |
| 1963 | 33.1% | 77.7% |
| 1962 | 32.1% | 77.1% |
| 1961 | 31.1% | 76.5% |
| 1960 | 30.2% | 76% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 66% to 85% in the Dominican Republic and from 86.3% to 87.1% in New Zealand.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Santiago de los Caballeros | 1.34M |
| Santo Domingo | 1.13M |
| Puerto Plata | 338K |
| La Vega | 282K |
| Higuey | 251K |
| San Cristobal | 233K |
| San Pedro de Macoris | 217K |
| San Francisco de Macoris | 188K |
| San Juan de la Maguana | 169K |
| Bonao | 158K |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Auckland | 1.47M |
| Christchurch | 383K |
| Wellington | 216K |
| Hamilton | 176K |
| Tauranga | 151K |
| Dunedin | 106K |
| Lower Hutt | 103K |
| Palmerston North | 81.5K |
| Napier | 66.3K |
| Porirua | 59.6K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons