The Dominican Republic has a population density of 614 people per square mile compared to 19.8 people in Kazakhstan. The Dominican Republic has 45,844 sq ft of land per person vs 1,424,328 sq ft in Kazakhstan. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, the Dominican Republic and Kazakhstan are ranked 49th and 187th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. The Dominican Republic has 0.14% of the world's population and 0.03% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.25% of the population and 1.81% of the land area for Kazakhstan, hence the population density in the Dominican Republic is 3,008% higher than in Kazakhstan.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 614 ppl/mi² | 19.8 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 49/197 | 187/197 |
| Population |
11591984
|
21036432
|
| Land area | 18,609 sq mi | 1,042,360 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 45,399 sq ft | 1,411,156 sq ft |
| Rural population | 15% | 41.6% |
| Urban population | 85% | 58.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 21.6% | 21.8% |
the Dominican Republic vs Kazakhstan:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in the Dominican Republic increased by 25.8%, compared to a 29.9% growth in Kazakhstan.
In 2004, the Dominican Republic ranked 43rd for population density and is in 49th place now. Kazakhstan was 181st in 2004 and ranks 187th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 614 | 19.8 |
| 2023 | 609 | 19.5 |
| 2022 | 603 | 19.2 |
| 2021 | 598 | 18.9 |
| 2020 | 592 | 18.7 |
| 2019 | 585 | 18.4 |
| 2018 | 578 | 18.2 |
| 2017 | 572 | 17.9 |
| 2016 | 566 | 17.6 |
| 2015 | 559 | 17.3 |
| 2014 | 553 | 17.1 |
| 2013 | 547 | 16.8 |
| 2012 | 540 | 16.6 |
| 2011 | 533 | 16.4 |
| 2010 | 526 | 16.2 |
| 2009 | 520 | 15.9 |
| 2008 | 513 | 15.8 |
| 2007 | 507 | 15.6 |
| 2006 | 501 | 15.4 |
| 2005 | 495 | 15.3 |
| 2004 | 488 | 15.2 |
| 2003 | 481 | 15.1 |
| 2002 | 475 | 15 |
| 2001 | 468 | 14.9 |
| 2000 | 460 | 14.9 |
| 1999 | 453 | 14.8 |
| 1998 | 446 | 15 |
| 1997 | 438 | 15.4 |
| 1996 | 431 | 15.7 |
| 1995 | 423 | 16.1 |
| 1994 | 415 | 16.4 |
| 1993 | 407 | 16.6 |
| 1992 | 399 | 16.6 |
| 1991 | 391 | - |
| 1990 | 383 | - |
| 1989 | 375 | - |
| 1988 | 368 | - |
| 1987 | 360 | - |
| 1986 | 352 | - |
| 1985 | 345 | - |
| 1984 | 337 | - |
| 1983 | 330 | - |
| 1982 | 322 | - |
| 1981 | 315 | - |
| 1980 | 307 | - |
| 1979 | 299.7 | - |
| 1978 | 292.3 | - |
| 1977 | 285 | - |
| 1976 | 277.7 | - |
| 1975 | 270.6 | - |
| 1974 | 263.5 | - |
| 1973 | 256.4 | - |
| 1972 | 249.4 | - |
| 1971 | 242.6 | - |
| 1970 | 235.9 | - |
| 1969 | 229.3 | - |
| 1968 | 222.9 | - |
| 1967 | 216.5 | - |
| 1966 | 210.3 | - |
| 1965 | 204.2 | - |
| 1964 | 198.3 | - |
| 1963 | 192.4 | - |
| 1962 | 186.6 | - |
| 1961 | 180.8 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 85% | 58.4% |
| 2023 | 84.4% | 58.2% |
| 2022 | 83.8% | 58% |
| 2021 | 83.2% | 57.8% |
| 2020 | 82.5% | 57.7% |
| 2019 | 81.8% | 57.5% |
| 2018 | 81.1% | 57.4% |
| 2017 | 80.3% | 57.3% |
| 2016 | 79.4% | 57.3% |
| 2015 | 78.6% | 57.2% |
| 2014 | 77.7% | 57.1% |
| 2013 | 76.7% | 57% |
| 2012 | 75.8% | 57% |
| 2011 | 74.8% | 56.9% |
| 2010 | 73.8% | 56.8% |
| 2009 | 72.5% | 56.8% |
| 2008 | 71.3% | 56.7% |
| 2007 | 70% | 56.6% |
| 2006 | 68.7% | 56.5% |
| 2005 | 67.4% | 56.5% |
| 2004 | 66% | 56.4% |
| 2003 | 64.6% | 56.3% |
| 2002 | 63.4% | 56.2% |
| 2001 | 62.6% | 56.2% |
| 2000 | 61.8% | 56.1% |
| 1999 | 60.9% | 56% |
| 1998 | 60.1% | 56% |
| 1997 | 59.3% | 56% |
| 1996 | 58.4% | 55.9% |
| 1995 | 57.6% | 55.9% |
| 1994 | 56.8% | 55.9% |
| 1993 | 56% | 56% |
| 1992 | 55.8% | 56.1% |
| 1991 | 55.5% | 56.2% |
| 1990 | 55.2% | 56.3% |
| 1989 | 55% | 56.4% |
| 1988 | 54.7% | 56.3% |
| 1987 | 54.4% | 56.2% |
| 1986 | 54.1% | 56.1% |
| 1985 | 53.9% | 56% |
| 1984 | 53.6% | 55.9% |
| 1983 | 53.3% | 55.5% |
| 1982 | 53.1% | 55% |
| 1981 | 52.4% | 54.6% |
| 1980 | 51.3% | 54.1% |
| 1979 | 50.2% | 53.7% |
| 1978 | 49.1% | 53.4% |
| 1977 | 47.9% | 53.1% |
| 1976 | 46.8% | 52.8% |
| 1975 | 45.7% | 52.6% |
| 1974 | 44.6% | 52.3% |
| 1973 | 43.5% | 51.8% |
| 1972 | 42.4% | 51.3% |
| 1971 | 41.4% | 50.8% |
| 1970 | 40.3% | 50.2% |
| 1969 | 39.2% | 49.6% |
| 1968 | 38.2% | 49% |
| 1967 | 37.1% | 48.3% |
| 1966 | 36.1% | 47.7% |
| 1965 | 35.1% | 47% |
| 1964 | 34% | 46.4% |
| 1963 | 33.1% | 45.8% |
| 1962 | 32.1% | 45.3% |
| 1961 | 31.1% | 44.7% |
| 1960 | 30.2% | 44.2% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 66% to 85% in the Dominican Republic and from 56.4% to 58.4% in Kazakhstan.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Santiago de los Caballeros | 1.34M |
| Santo Domingo | 1.13M |
| Puerto Plata | 338K |
| La Vega | 282K |
| Higuey | 251K |
| San Cristobal | 233K |
| San Pedro de Macoris | 217K |
| San Francisco de Macoris | 188K |
| San Juan de la Maguana | 169K |
| Bonao | 158K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons