Namibia has a population density of 9.53 people per square mile compared to 21,776 people in Singapore. Namibia has 2,932,826 sq ft of land per person vs 1,282 sq ft in Singapore. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Namibia and Singapore are ranked 195th and 2nd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Namibia has 0.04% of the world's population and 0.55% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.07% of the population and 0.0005% of the land area for Singapore, hence the population density in Namibia is 100% lower than in Singapore.
Population density comparison
Namibia
|
Singapore
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 9.53 ppl/mi² | 21,776 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 195/197 | 2/197 |
| Population |
3141364
|
6105665
|
| Land area | 317,874 sq mi | 277.2 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 2,924,567 sq ft | 1,280 sq ft |
| Rural population | 44.2% | 0% |
| Urban population | 55.8% | 100% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 97.2% |
Namibia vs Singapore:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Namibia increased by 56%, compared to a 39% growth in Singapore.
In 2004, Namibia ranked 191st for population density and is in 195th place now. Singapore was 2nd in 2004 and still ranks 2nd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Namibia
|
Singapore
|
|
| 2024 | 9.53 | 21,776 |
| 2023 | 9.32 | 21,346 |
| 2022 | 9.09 | 20,334 |
| 2021 | 8.84 | 19,672 |
| 2020 | 8.58 | 20,510 |
| 2019 | 8.34 | 20,632 |
| 2018 | 8.11 | 20,454 |
| 2017 | 7.89 | 20,415 |
| 2016 | 7.67 | 20,483 |
| 2015 | 7.47 | 20,219 |
| 2014 | 7.27 | 19,981 |
| 2013 | 7.09 | 19,779 |
| 2012 | 6.9 | 19,489 |
| 2011 | 6.75 | 19,071 |
| 2010 | 6.64 | 18,730 |
| 2009 | 6.54 | 18,454 |
| 2008 | 6.44 | 17,906 |
| 2007 | 6.35 | 17,100 |
| 2006 | 6.27 | 16,426 |
| 2005 | 6.19 | 16,035 |
| 2004 | 6.11 | 15,663 |
| 2003 | 6.03 | 15,513 |
| 2002 | 5.95 | 16,023 |
| 2001 | 5.84 | 15,996 |
| 2000 | 5.72 | 15,570 |
| 1999 | 5.59 | 15,303 |
| 1998 | 5.45 | 15,181 |
| 1997 | 5.31 | 14,674 |
| 1996 | 5.18 | 14,190 |
| 1995 | 5.04 | 13,625 |
| 1994 | 4.9 | 13,217 |
| 1993 | 4.75 | 12,809 |
| 1992 | 4.6 | 12,489 |
| 1991 | 4.45 | 12,119 |
| 1990 | 4.31 | 11,779 |
| 1989 | 4.05 | 11,330 |
| 1988 | 3.81 | 11,002 |
| 1987 | 3.67 | 10,726 |
| 1986 | 3.56 | 10,566 |
| 1985 | 3.45 | 10,576 |
| 1984 | 3.35 | 10,562 |
| 1983 | 3.26 | 10,364 |
| 1982 | 3.18 | 10,230 |
| 1981 | 3.12 | 9,791 |
| 1980 | 3.09 | 9,331 |
| 1979 | 3.03 | 9,214 |
| 1978 | 2.98 | 9,098 |
| 1977 | 2.93 | 8,989 |
| 1976 | 2.85 | 8,865 |
| 1975 | 2.77 | 8,746 |
| 1974 | 2.69 | 8,620 |
| 1973 | 2.61 | 8,477 |
| 1972 | 2.53 | 8,320 |
| 1971 | 2.46 | 8,168 |
| 1970 | 2.38 | 8,019 |
| 1969 | 2.32 | 7,896 |
| 1968 | 2.25 | 7,778 |
| 1967 | 2.19 | 7,645 |
| 1966 | 2.13 | 7,478 |
| 1965 | 2.08 | 7,294 |
| 1964 | 2.03 | 7,119 |
| 1963 | 1.98 | 6,939 |
| 1962 | 1.94 | 6,766 |
| 1961 | 1.9 | 6,581 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Namibia
|
Singapore
|
|
| 2024 | 55.8% | 100% |
| 2023 | 54.9% | 100% |
| 2022 | 54% | 100% |
| 2021 | 53% | 100% |
| 2020 | 52% | 100% |
| 2019 | 51% | 100% |
| 2018 | 50% | 100% |
| 2017 | 49% | 100% |
| 2016 | 48% | 100% |
| 2015 | 46.9% | 100% |
| 2014 | 45.8% | 100% |
| 2013 | 44.8% | 100% |
| 2012 | 43.7% | 100% |
| 2011 | 42.6% | 100% |
| 2010 | 41.6% | 100% |
| 2009 | 40.6% | 100% |
| 2008 | 39.6% | 100% |
| 2007 | 38.6% | 100% |
| 2006 | 37.6% | 100% |
| 2005 | 36.6% | 100% |
| 2004 | 35.7% | 100% |
| 2003 | 34.7% | 100% |
| 2002 | 33.8% | 100% |
| 2001 | 32.9% | 100% |
| 2000 | 32.4% | 100% |
| 1999 | 31.9% | 100% |
| 1998 | 31.3% | 100% |
| 1997 | 30.8% | 100% |
| 1996 | 30.3% | 100% |
| 1995 | 29.8% | 100% |
| 1994 | 29.3% | 100% |
| 1993 | 28.8% | 100% |
| 1992 | 28.3% | 100% |
| 1991 | 27.9% | 100% |
| 1990 | 27.7% | 100% |
| 1989 | 27.4% | 100% |
| 1988 | 27.1% | 100% |
| 1987 | 26.9% | 100% |
| 1986 | 26.6% | 100% |
| 1985 | 26.4% | 100% |
| 1984 | 26.1% | 100% |
| 1983 | 25.9% | 100% |
| 1982 | 25.6% | 100% |
| 1981 | 25.4% | 100% |
| 1980 | 25.1% | 100% |
| 1979 | 24.8% | 100% |
| 1978 | 24.5% | 100% |
| 1977 | 24.2% | 100% |
| 1976 | 23.9% | 100% |
| 1975 | 23.7% | 100% |
| 1974 | 23.4% | 100% |
| 1973 | 23.1% | 100% |
| 1972 | 22.8% | 100% |
| 1971 | 22.6% | 100% |
| 1970 | 22.3% | 100% |
| 1969 | 21.9% | 100% |
| 1968 | 21.4% | 100% |
| 1967 | 20.9% | 100% |
| 1966 | 20.5% | 100% |
| 1965 | 20% | 100% |
| 1964 | 19.6% | 100% |
| 1963 | 19.2% | 100% |
| 1962 | 18.7% | 100% |
| 1961 | 18.3% | 100% |
| 1960 | 17.9% | 100% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 35.7% to 55.8% in Namibia and from 100% to 100% in Singapore.
Densely populated cities
|
Namibia
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Windhoek | 431K |
| Walvis Bay | 103K |
|
Singapore
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Singapore | 5.87M |
| Bukit Merah | 152K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
