Mexico has a population density of 174.4 people per square mile compared to 21,776 people in Singapore. Mexico has 162,251 sq ft of land per person vs 1,282 sq ft in Singapore. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Mexico and Singapore are ranked 123rd and 2nd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Mexico has 1.61% of the world's population and 1.31% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.07% of the population and 0.0005% of the land area for Singapore, hence the population density in Mexico is 99.2% lower than in Singapore.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 174.4 ppl/mi² | 21,776 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 123/197 | 2/197 |
| Population |
132790957
|
6105665
|
| Land area | 750,563 sq mi | 277.2 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 159,899 sq ft | 1,280 sq ft |
| Rural population | 18.1% | 0% |
| Urban population | 81.9% | 100% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 17.3% | 97.2% |
Mexico vs Singapore:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Mexico increased by 25.4%, compared to a 39% growth in Singapore.
In 2004, Mexico ranked 120th for population density and is in 123rd place now. Singapore was 2nd in 2004 and still ranks 2nd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 174.4 | 21,776 |
| 2023 | 172.9 | 21,346 |
| 2022 | 171.4 | 20,334 |
| 2021 | 170.1 | 19,672 |
| 2020 | 168.9 | 20,510 |
| 2019 | 167.6 | 20,632 |
| 2018 | 166 | 20,454 |
| 2017 | 164.4 | 20,415 |
| 2016 | 162.9 | 20,483 |
| 2015 | 161.3 | 20,219 |
| 2014 | 159.6 | 19,981 |
| 2013 | 157.7 | 19,779 |
| 2012 | 155.6 | 19,489 |
| 2011 | 153.5 | 19,071 |
| 2010 | 151.4 | 18,730 |
| 2009 | 149.2 | 18,454 |
| 2008 | 147.1 | 17,906 |
| 2007 | 144.9 | 17,100 |
| 2006 | 142.9 | 16,426 |
| 2005 | 141 | 16,035 |
| 2004 | 139.1 | 15,663 |
| 2003 | 137.2 | 15,513 |
| 2002 | 135.3 | 16,023 |
| 2001 | 133.4 | 15,996 |
| 2000 | 131.4 | 15,570 |
| 1999 | 129.4 | 15,303 |
| 1998 | 127.3 | 15,181 |
| 1997 | 125.3 | 14,674 |
| 1996 | 123.2 | 14,190 |
| 1995 | 121.1 | 13,625 |
| 1994 | 118.9 | 13,217 |
| 1993 | 116.8 | 12,809 |
| 1992 | 114.6 | 12,489 |
| 1991 | 112.5 | 12,119 |
| 1990 | 110.3 | 11,779 |
| 1989 | 108.2 | 11,330 |
| 1988 | 106.2 | 11,002 |
| 1987 | 104.1 | 10,726 |
| 1986 | 102 | 10,566 |
| 1985 | 100 | 10,576 |
| 1984 | 97.9 | 10,562 |
| 1983 | 95.9 | 10,364 |
| 1982 | 93.8 | 10,230 |
| 1981 | 91.8 | 9,791 |
| 1980 | 89.7 | 9,331 |
| 1979 | 87.5 | 9,214 |
| 1978 | 85.2 | 9,098 |
| 1977 | 83 | 8,989 |
| 1976 | 80.8 | 8,865 |
| 1975 | 78.6 | 8,746 |
| 1974 | 76.4 | 8,620 |
| 1973 | 74.2 | 8,477 |
| 1972 | 72 | 8,320 |
| 1971 | 69.8 | 8,168 |
| 1970 | 67.7 | 8,019 |
| 1969 | 65.6 | 7,896 |
| 1968 | 63.5 | 7,778 |
| 1967 | 61.5 | 7,645 |
| 1966 | 59.5 | 7,478 |
| 1965 | 57.5 | 7,294 |
| 1964 | 55.7 | 7,119 |
| 1963 | 53.9 | 6,939 |
| 1962 | 52.1 | 6,766 |
| 1961 | 50.5 | 6,581 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 81.9% | 100% |
| 2023 | 81.6% | 100% |
| 2022 | 81.3% | 100% |
| 2021 | 81% | 100% |
| 2020 | 80.7% | 100% |
| 2019 | 80.4% | 100% |
| 2018 | 80.2% | 100% |
| 2017 | 79.9% | 100% |
| 2016 | 79.6% | 100% |
| 2015 | 79.3% | 100% |
| 2014 | 79% | 100% |
| 2013 | 78.7% | 100% |
| 2012 | 78.4% | 100% |
| 2011 | 78.1% | 100% |
| 2010 | 77.8% | 100% |
| 2009 | 77.5% | 100% |
| 2008 | 77.2% | 100% |
| 2007 | 76.9% | 100% |
| 2006 | 76.6% | 100% |
| 2005 | 76.3% | 100% |
| 2004 | 76% | 100% |
| 2003 | 75.7% | 100% |
| 2002 | 75.4% | 100% |
| 2001 | 75% | 100% |
| 2000 | 74.7% | 100% |
| 1999 | 74.4% | 100% |
| 1998 | 74.2% | 100% |
| 1997 | 73.9% | 100% |
| 1996 | 73.7% | 100% |
| 1995 | 73.4% | 100% |
| 1994 | 73% | 100% |
| 1993 | 72.6% | 100% |
| 1992 | 72.2% | 100% |
| 1991 | 71.8% | 100% |
| 1990 | 71.4% | 100% |
| 1989 | 71% | 100% |
| 1988 | 70.5% | 100% |
| 1987 | 70% | 100% |
| 1986 | 69.5% | 100% |
| 1985 | 69% | 100% |
| 1984 | 68.4% | 100% |
| 1983 | 67.9% | 100% |
| 1982 | 67.4% | 100% |
| 1981 | 66.9% | 100% |
| 1980 | 66.3% | 100% |
| 1979 | 65.6% | 100% |
| 1978 | 64.9% | 100% |
| 1977 | 64.2% | 100% |
| 1976 | 63.5% | 100% |
| 1975 | 62.8% | 100% |
| 1974 | 62% | 100% |
| 1973 | 61.3% | 100% |
| 1972 | 60.5% | 100% |
| 1971 | 59.8% | 100% |
| 1970 | 59% | 100% |
| 1969 | 58.2% | 100% |
| 1968 | 57.4% | 100% |
| 1967 | 56.6% | 100% |
| 1966 | 55.8% | 100% |
| 1965 | 54.9% | 100% |
| 1964 | 54.1% | 100% |
| 1963 | 53.3% | 100% |
| 1962 | 52.4% | 100% |
| 1961 | 51.6% | 100% |
| 1960 | 50.8% | 100% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 76% to 81.9% in Mexico and from 100% to 100% in Singapore.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Mexico | 9.21M |
| Tijuana | 1.96M |
| Ecatepec de Morelos | 1.93M |
| Leon | 1.58M |
| Zapopan | 1.48M |
| Guadalajara | 1.46M |
| Puebla | 1.43M |
| Ciudad Juarez | 1.32M |
| Monterrey | 1.14M |
| Ciudad Nezahualcoyotl | 1.07M |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Singapore | 5.87M |
| Bukit Merah | 152K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons